1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
|
This is a place for planning the ongoing long-term work in the GPIO
subsystem.
GPIO descriptors
Starting with commit 79a9becda894 the GPIO subsystem embarked on a journey
to move away from the global GPIO numberspace and toward a decriptor-based
approach. This means that GPIO consumers, drivers and machine descriptions
ideally have no use or idea of the global GPIO numberspace that has/was
used in the inception of the GPIO subsystem.
Work items:
- Convert all GPIO device drivers to only #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
- Convert all consumer drivers to only #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
- Convert all machine descriptors in "boardfiles" to only
#include <linux/gpio/machine.h>, the other option being to convert it
to a machine description such as device tree, ACPI or fwnode that
implicitly does not use global GPIO numbers.
- When this work is complete (will require some of the items in the
following ongoing work as well) we can delete the old global
numberspace accessors from <linux/gpio.h> and eventually delete
<linux/gpio.h> altogether.
Get rid of <linux/of_gpio.h>
This header and helpers appeared at one point when there was no proper
driver infrastructure for doing simpler MMIO GPIO devices and there was
no core support for parsing device tree GPIOs from the core library with
the [devm_]gpiod_get() calls we have today that will implicitly go into
the device tree back-end.
Work items:
- Get rid of struct of_mm_gpio_chip altogether: use the generic MMIO
GPIO for all current users (see below). Delete struct of_mm_gpio_chip,
to_of_mm_gpio_chip(), of_mm_gpiochip_add_data(), of_mm_gpiochip_add()
of_mm_gpiochip_remove() from the kernel.
- Change all consumer drivers that #include <linux/of_gpio.h> to
#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> and stop doing custom parsing of the
GPIO lines from the device tree. This can be tricky and often ivolves
changing boardfiles, etc.
- Pull semantics for legacy device tree (OF) GPIO lookups into
gpiolib-of.c: in some cases subsystems are doing custom flags and
lookups for polarity inversion, open drain and what not. As we now
handle this with generic OF bindings, pull all legacy handling into
gpiolib so the library API becomes narrow and deep and handle all
legacy bindings internally. (See e.g. commits 6953c57ab172,
6a537d48461d etc)
- Delete <linux/of_gpio.h> when all the above is complete and everything
uses <linux/gpio/consumer.h> or <linux/gpio/driver.h> instead.
Collect drivers
Collect GPIO drivers from arch/* and other places that should be placed
in drivers/gpio/gpio-*. Augment platforms to create platform devices or
similar and probe a proper driver in the gpiolib subsystem.
In some cases it makes sense to create a GPIO chip from the local driver
for a few GPIOs. Those should stay where they are.
Generic MMIO GPIO
The GPIO drivers can utilize the generic MMIO helper library in many
cases, and the helper library should be as helpful as possible for MMIO
drivers. (drivers/gpio/gpio-mmio.c)
Work items:
- Look over and identify any remaining easily converted drivers and
dry-code conversions to MMIO GPIO for maintainers to test
- Expand the MMIO GPIO or write a new library for port-mapped I/O
helpers (x86 inb()/outb()) and convert port-mapped I/O drivers to use
this with dry-coding and sending to maintainers to test
GPIOLIB irqchip
The GPIOLIB irqchip is a helper irqchip for "simple cases" that should
try to cover any generic kind of irqchip cascaded from a GPIO.
- Look over and identify any remaining easily converted drivers and
dry-code conversions to gpiolib irqchip for maintainers to test
- Support generic hierarchical GPIO interrupts: these are for the
non-cascading case where there is one IRQ per GPIO line, there is
currently no common infrastructure for this.
Increase integration with pin control
There are already ways to use pin control as back-end for GPIO and
it may make sense to bring these subsystems closer. One reason for
creating pin control as its own subsystem was that we could avoid any
use of the global GPIO numbers. Once the above is complete, it may
make sense to simply join the subsystems into one and make pin
multiplexing, pin configuration, GPIO, etc selectable options in one
and the same pin control and GPIO subsystem.
|
