| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since obj->frontbuffer is no longer protected by the struct_mutex, as we
are processing the execbuf, it may be removed. Mark the
intel_frontbuffer as rcu protected, and so acquire a reference to
the struct as we track activity upon it.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/827
Fixes: 8e7cb1799b4f ("drm/i915: Extract intel_frontbuffer active tracking")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191218104043.3539458-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Wait for the object to be idle before changing its cache-level and
unbinding. This was dropped as supposedly superfluous from commit
8b1c78e06e61 ("drm/i915: Avoid calling i915_gem_object_unbind holding
object lock"), but it turns out to prevent some cache dirt escaping.
Smells like papering over a race...
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/820
Fixes: 8b1c78e06e61 ("drm/i915: Avoid calling i915_gem_object_unbind holding object lock")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191213223140.1830738-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As i915_gem_object_unbind() waits on an rcu_barrier() to flush vm
releases (and destruction of their bound vma), we have to be careful not
to invoke that barrier from beneath the shrinker:
<4> [430.222671] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [430.222673] 5.4.0-rc8-CI-CI_DRM_7508+ #1 Tainted: G U
<4> [430.222675] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [430.222677] gem_pwrite/2317 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [430.222678] ffffffff82248218 (rcu_state.barrier_mutex){+.+.}, at: rcu_barrier+0x23/0x190
<4> [430.222685]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [430.222687] ffffffff82263a40 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: fs_reclaim_acquire.part.117+0x0/0x30
<4> [430.222691]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
<4> [430.222693]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
<4> [430.222695]
-> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}:
<4> [430.222698] fs_reclaim_acquire.part.117+0x24/0x30
<4> [430.222702] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2a/0x2c0
<4> [430.222705] intel_cpuc_prepare+0x37/0x1a0
<4> [430.222709] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x9b/0x9d0
<4> [430.222712] _cpu_up+0xa2/0x140
<4> [430.222714] do_cpu_up+0x61/0xa0
<4> [430.222718] smp_init+0x57/0x96
<4> [430.222722] kernel_init_freeable+0xac/0x1c7
<4> [430.222725] kernel_init+0x5/0x100
<4> [430.222728] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50
<4> [430.222729]
-> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}:
<4> [430.222733] cpus_read_lock+0x34/0xd0
<4> [430.222734] rcu_barrier+0xaa/0x190
<4> [430.222736] kernel_init+0x21/0x100
<4> [430.222737] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50
<4> [430.222739]
-> #0 (rcu_state.barrier_mutex){+.+.}:
<4> [430.222742] __lock_acquire+0x1328/0x15d0
<4> [430.222743] lock_acquire+0xa7/0x1c0
<4> [430.222746] __mutex_lock+0x9a/0x9d0
<4> [430.222747] rcu_barrier+0x23/0x190
<4> [430.222850] i915_gem_object_unbind+0x264/0x3d0 [i915]
<4> [430.222882] i915_gem_shrink+0x297/0x5f0 [i915]
<4> [430.222912] i915_gem_shrink_all+0x38/0x60 [i915]
<4> [430.222934] i915_drop_caches_set+0x1f0/0x240 [i915]
<4> [430.222938] simple_attr_write+0xb0/0xd0
<4> [430.222941] full_proxy_write+0x51/0x80
<4> [430.222943] vfs_write+0xb9/0x1d0
<4> [430.222944] ksys_write+0x9f/0xe0
<4> [430.222946] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x210
<4> [430.222948] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
<4> [430.222950]
other info that might help us debug this:
<4> [430.222952] Chain exists of:
rcu_state.barrier_mutex --> cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem --> fs_reclaim
<4> [430.222955] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [430.222957] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [430.222958] ---- ----
<4> [430.222960] lock(fs_reclaim);
<4> [430.222961] lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem);
<4> [430.222963] lock(fs_reclaim);
<4> [430.222964] lock(rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
<4> [430.222966]
*** DEADLOCK ***
<4> [430.222968] 3 locks held by gem_pwrite/2317:
<4> [430.222969] #0: ffff88849e2d9408 (sb_writers#14){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x1a4/0x1d0
<4> [430.222973] #1: ffff888496976db0 (&attr->mutex){+.+.}, at: simple_attr_write+0x36/0xd0
<4> [430.222976] #2: ffffffff82263a40 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: fs_reclaim_acquire.part.117+0x0/0x30
<4> [430.222980]
stack backtrace:
<4> [430.222982] CPU: 1 PID: 2317 Comm: gem_pwrite Tainted: G U 5.4.0-rc8-CI-CI_DRM_7508+ #1
<4> [430.222985] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake Client Platform/TigerLake U DDR4 SODIMM RVP, BIOS TGLSFWI1.R00.2321.A08.1909162051 09/16/2019
<4> [430.222989] Call Trace:
<4> [430.222992] dump_stack+0x71/0x9b
<4> [430.222995] check_noncircular+0x19b/0x1c0
<4> [430.222998] ? __lock_acquire+0x1328/0x15d0
<4> [430.222999] __lock_acquire+0x1328/0x15d0
<4> [430.223001] ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70
<4> [430.223003] lock_acquire+0xa7/0x1c0
<4> [430.223005] ? rcu_barrier+0x23/0x190
<4> [430.223008] __mutex_lock+0x9a/0x9d0
<4> [430.223009] ? rcu_barrier+0x23/0x190
<4> [430.223011] ? rcu_barrier+0x23/0x190
<4> [430.223013] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90
<4> [430.223045] ? i915_gem_object_unbind+0x24a/0x3d0 [i915]
<4> [430.223048] ? rcu_barrier+0x23/0x190
<4> [430.223049] rcu_barrier+0x23/0x190
<4> [430.223081] i915_gem_object_unbind+0x264/0x3d0 [i915]
<4> [430.223119] i915_gem_shrink+0x297/0x5f0 [i915]
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/743
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191208161252.3015727-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the extreme case, we may wish to wait on an rcu-barrier to reap stale
vm to purge the last of the object bindings. However, we are not allowed
to use rcu_barrier() beneath the dma_resv (i.e. object) lock and do not
take lightly the prospect of unlocking a mutex deep in the bowels of the
routine. i915_gem_object_unbind() itself does not need the object lock,
and it turns out the callers do not need to the unbind as part of a
locked sequence around set-cache-level, so rearrange the code to avoid
taking the object lock in the callers.
<4> [186.816311] ======================================================
<4> [186.816313] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [186.816316] 5.4.0-rc8-CI-CI_DRM_7486+ #1 Tainted: G U
<4> [186.816318] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [186.816320] perf_pmu/1321 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [186.816322] ffff88849487c4d8 (&mm->mmap_sem#2){++++}, at: __might_fault+0x39/0x90
<4> [186.816331]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [186.816333] ffffe8ffffa05008 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}, at: perf_event_ctx_lock_nested+0xa9/0x1b0
<4> [186.816339]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
<4> [186.816341]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
<4> [186.816343]
-> #6 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}:
<4> [186.816349] __mutex_lock+0x9a/0x9d0
<4> [186.816352] perf_event_init_cpu+0xa4/0x140
<4> [186.816357] perf_event_init+0x19d/0x1cd
<4> [186.816362] start_kernel+0x372/0x4f4
<4> [186.816365] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
<4> [186.816381]
-> #5 (pmus_lock){+.+.}:
<4> [186.816385] __mutex_lock+0x9a/0x9d0
<4> [186.816387] perf_event_init_cpu+0x6b/0x140
<4> [186.816404] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x9b/0x9d0
<4> [186.816406] _cpu_up+0xa2/0x140
<4> [186.816409] do_cpu_up+0x61/0xa0
<4> [186.816411] smp_init+0x57/0x96
<4> [186.816413] kernel_init_freeable+0xac/0x1c7
<4> [186.816416] kernel_init+0x5/0x100
<4> [186.816419] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50
<4> [186.816421]
-> #4 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}:
<4> [186.816424] cpus_read_lock+0x34/0xd0
<4> [186.816427] rcu_barrier+0xaa/0x190
<4> [186.816429] kernel_init+0x21/0x100
<4> [186.816431] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50
<4> [186.816433]
-> #3 (rcu_state.barrier_mutex){+.+.}:
<4> [186.816436] __mutex_lock+0x9a/0x9d0
<4> [186.816438] rcu_barrier+0x23/0x190
<4> [186.816502] i915_gem_object_unbind+0x3a6/0x400 [i915]
<4> [186.816537] i915_gem_object_set_cache_level+0x32/0x90 [i915]
<4> [186.816571] i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane+0x5d/0x160 [i915]
<4> [186.816612] intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj+0x9e/0x200 [i915]
<4> [186.816679] intel_plane_pin_fb+0x3f/0xd0 [i915]
<4> [186.816717] intel_prepare_plane_fb+0x130/0x520 [i915]
<4> [186.816722] drm_atomic_helper_prepare_planes+0x85/0x110
<4> [186.816761] intel_atomic_commit+0xc6/0x350 [i915]
<4> [186.816764] drm_atomic_helper_update_plane+0xed/0x110
<4> [186.816768] setplane_internal+0x97/0x190
<4> [186.816770] drm_mode_setplane+0xcd/0x190
<4> [186.816773] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa7/0xf0
<4> [186.816775] drm_ioctl+0x2e1/0x390
<4> [186.816778] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa0/0x6f0
<4> [186.816780] ksys_ioctl+0x35/0x60
<4> [186.816782] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11/0x20
<4> [186.816785] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x210
<4> [186.816787] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
<4> [186.816789]
-> #2 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}:
<4> [186.816793] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.15+0xc3/0x1090
<4> [186.816795] ww_mutex_lock+0x39/0x70
<4> [186.816798] dma_resv_lockdep+0x10e/0x1f7
<4> [186.816800] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2ff
<4> [186.816802] kernel_init_freeable+0x137/0x1c7
<4> [186.816804] kernel_init+0x5/0x100
<4> [186.816806] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50
<4> [186.816808]
-> #1 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}:
<4> [186.816811] dma_resv_lockdep+0xec/0x1f7
<4> [186.816813] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2ff
<4> [186.816815] kernel_init_freeable+0x137/0x1c7
<4> [186.816817] kernel_init+0x5/0x100
<4> [186.816819] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50
<4> [186.816820]
-> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem#2){++++}:
<4> [186.816824] __lock_acquire+0x1328/0x15d0
<4> [186.816826] lock_acquire+0xa7/0x1c0
<4> [186.816828] __might_fault+0x63/0x90
<4> [186.816831] _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
<4> [186.816834] perf_read+0x200/0x2b0
<4> [186.816836] vfs_read+0x96/0x160
<4> [186.816838] ksys_read+0x9f/0xe0
<4> [186.816839] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x210
<4> [186.816841] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
<4> [186.816843]
other info that might help us debug this:
<4> [186.816846] Chain exists of:
&mm->mmap_sem#2 --> pmus_lock --> &cpuctx_mutex
<4> [186.816849] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [186.816851] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [186.816853] ---- ----
<4> [186.816854] lock(&cpuctx_mutex);
<4> [186.816856] lock(pmus_lock);
<4> [186.816858] lock(&cpuctx_mutex);
<4> [186.816860] lock(&mm->mmap_sem#2);
<4> [186.816861]
*** DEADLOCK ***
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/728
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191206105527.1130413-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remember to take the lock before walking the obj->vma.list so that the
nodes do not change beneath us! E.g.,
i915_gem_object_bump_inactive_ggtt:387 GEM_BUG_ON(vma->vm != &i915->ggtt.vm)
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/691
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191204164527.3872783-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is really just an alias of mmap_gtt. The 'mmap offset' nomenclature
comes from the value returned by this ioctl which is the offset into the
device fd which userpace uses with mmap(2).
mmap_gtt was our initial mmap_offset implementation, this extends
our CPU mmap support to allow additional fault handlers that depends on
the object's backing pages.
Note that we multiplex mmap_gtt and mmap_offset through the same ioctl,
and use the zero extending behaviour of drm to differentiate between
them, when we inspect the flags.
To support multiple mmap types on an object we need to support multiple
mmap_offsets for an object (each offset in the global device address
space corresponding to a unique instance of the object for a file + mmap
type). As we drop the simplified drm core idea of a single mmap_offset,
we need to provide replacement hooks for the dumb mmap interface as
well.
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/merge_requests/1675
Testcase: igt/gem_mmap_offset
Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191204120032.3682839-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Avoid dangerous race handling of destroyed vma by unbinding all vma
instead. Unfortunately, this stops us from trying to be clever and only
doing the minimal change required, so on first use of scanout we may
encounter an annoying stall as it transitions to a new cache level.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112413
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191202174310.2630302-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When userspace writes into the GTT itself, it is supposed to call
set-domain to let the kernel keep track and so manage the CPU/GPU
caches. As we track writes on the individual i915_vma, we should also be
sure to mark them as dirty.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191119112515.2766748-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If Local memory is supported by hardware, we want framebuffer backing
gem objects from local memory.
if the backing obj is not from LMEM, pin_to_display is failed.
v2:
memory regions are correctly assigned to obj->memory_regions [tvrtko]
migration failure is reported as debug log [Tvrtko]
v3:
Migration is dropped. only error is reported [Daniel]
mem region check is move to pin_to_display [Chris]
v4:
s/dev_priv/i915 [chris]
v5:
i915_gem_object_is_lmem is used for detecting the obj mem type. [Matt]
cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191105144414.30470-1-ramalingam.c@intel.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the
local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the
shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot
allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate
workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we
reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes
with the GPU work and with later unbind).
In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to
avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is
the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not
to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma
does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM
fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping
the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by
a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we
do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate
and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv
itself.
Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the
destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex.
A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires
decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new
i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages.
However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm
discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with
trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called!
v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add an atomic counter and always take the spinlock around the pin/unpin
events, so that we can perform the list manipulation concurrently.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190910212204.17190-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Try to tidy up the cache-coloring such that we rid the code of any
mm.color_adjust assumptions, this should hopefully make it more obvious
in the code when we need to actually use the cache-level as the color,
and as a bonus should make adding a different color-scheme simpler.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190909124052.22900-3-matthew.auld@intel.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
obj->pin_global was originally used as a means to keep the shrinker off
the active scanout, but we use the vma->pin_count itself for that and
the obj->frontbuffer to delay shrinking active framebuffers. The other
role that obj->pin_global gained was for spotting display objects inside
GEM and working harder to keep those coherent; for which we can again
simply inspect obj->frontbuffer directly.
Coming up next, we will want to manipulate the pin_global counter
outside of the principle locks, so would need to make pin_global atomic.
However, since obj->frontbuffer is already managed atomically, it makes
sense to use that the primary key for display objects instead of having
pin_global.
Ville pointed out the principle difference is that obj->frontbuffer is
set for as long as an intel_framebuffer is attached to an object, but
obj->pin_global was only raised for as long as the object was active. In
practice, this means that we consider the object as being on the scanout
for longer than is strictly required, causing us to be more proactive in
flushing -- though it should be true that we would have flushed
eventually when the back became the front, except that on the flip path
that flush is async but when hit from another ioctl it will be
synchronous.
v2: i915_gem_object_is_framebuffer()
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190902040303.14195-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Avoid calling i915_vma_put_fence() by using our alternate paths that
bind a secondary vma avoiding the original fenced vma. For the few
instances where we need to release the fence (i.e. on binding when the
GGTT range becomes invalid), replace the put_fence with a revoke_fence.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190822061557.18402-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Move the active tracking for the frontbuffer operations out of the
i915_gem_object and into its own first class (refcounted) object. In the
process of detangling, we switch from low level request tracking to the
easier i915_active -- with the plan that this avoids any potential
atomic callbacks as the frontbuffer tracking wishes to sleep as it
flushes.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190816074635.26062-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that we have a new subdirectory for display code, continue by moving
modesetting core code.
display/intel_frontbuffer.h sticks out like a sore thumb, otherwise this
is, again, a surprisingly clean operation.
v2:
- don't move intel_sideband.[ch] (Ville)
- use tabs for Makefile file lists and sort them
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613084416.6794-3-jani.nikula@intel.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With async binding, we don't want to manage a bound/unbound list as we
may end up running before we even acquire the pages. All that is
required is keeping track of shrinkable objects, so reduce it to the
minimum list.
Fixes: 6951e5893b48 ("drm/i915: Move GEM object domain management from struct_mutex to local")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190612105720.30310-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The intent is to be able to update the mm.lists from inside an irqsoff
section (e.g. from a softirq rcu workqueue), ergo we need to make the
i915->mm.obj_lock irqsafe.
v2: can_discard_pages() ensures we are shrinkable
v3: Beware shadowing of 'flags'
Fixes: 3b4fa9640ccd ("drm/i915: Track the purgeable objects on a separate eviction list")
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110869
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190610145430.17717-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, we try to report to the shrinker the precise number of
objects (pages) that are available to be reaped at this moment. This
requires searching all objects with allocated pages to see if they
fulfill the search criteria, and this count is performed quite
frequently. (The shrinker tries to free ~128 pages on each invocation,
before which we count all the objects; counting takes longer than
unbinding the objects!) If we take the pragmatic view that with
sufficient desire, all objects are eventually reapable (they become
inactive, or no longer used as framebuffer etc), we can simply return
the count of pinned pages maintained during get_pages/put_pages rather
than walk the lists every time.
The downside is that we may (slightly) over-report the number of
objects/pages we could shrink and so penalize ourselves by shrinking
more than required. This is mitigated by keeping the order in which we
shrink objects such that we avoid penalizing active and frequently used
objects, and if memory is so tight that we need to free them we would
need to anyway.
v2: Only expose shrinkable objects to the shrinker; a small reduction in
not considering stolen and foreign objects.
v3: Restore the tracking from a "backup" copy from before the gem/ split
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190530203500.26272-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently the purgeable objects, I915_MADV_DONTNEED, are mixed in the
normal bound/unbound lists. Every shrinker pass starts with an attempt
to purge from this set of unneeded objects, which entails us doing a
walk over both lists looking for any candidates. If there are none, and
since we are shrinking we can reasonably assume that the lists are
full!, this becomes a very slow futile walk.
If we separate out the purgeable objects into own list, this search then
becomes its own phase that is preferentially handled during shrinking.
Instead the cost becomes that we then need to filter the purgeable list
if we want to distinguish between bound and unbound objects.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190530203500.26272-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use the per-object local lock to control the cache domain of the
individual GEM objects, not struct_mutex. This is a huge leap forward
for us in terms of object-level synchronisation; execbuffers are
coordinated using the ww_mutex and pread/pwrite is finally fully
serialised again.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190528092956.14910-10-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
|
Continuing the decluttering of i915_gem.c, that of the read/write
domains, perhaps the biggest of GEM's follies?
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190528092956.14910-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
