perf tools: Use __maybe_used for unused variables

perf defines both __used and __unused variables to use for marking
unused variables. The variable __used is defined to
__attribute__((__unused__)), which contradicts the kernel definition to
__attribute__((__used__)) for new gcc versions. On Android, __used is
also defined in system headers and this leads to warnings like: warning:
'__used__' attribute ignored

__unused is not defined in the kernel and is not a standard definition.
If __unused is included everywhere instead of __used, this leads to
conflicts with glibc headers, since glibc has a variables with this name
in its headers.

The best approach is to use __maybe_unused, the definition used in the
kernel for __attribute__((unused)). In this way there is only one
definition in perf sources (instead of 2 definitions that point to the
same thing: __used and __unused) and it works on both Linux and Android.
This patch simply replaces all instances of __used and __unused with
__maybe_unused.

Signed-off-by: Irina Tirdea <irina.tirdea@intel.com>
Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1347315303-29906-7-git-send-email-irina.tirdea@intel.com
[ committer note: fixed up conflict with a116e05 in builtin-sched.c ]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/callchain.c b/tools/perf/util/callchain.c
index 3a6bff47614f..d3b3f5d82137 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/callchain.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/callchain.c
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ __sort_chain_flat(struct rb_root *rb_root, struct callchain_node *node,
  */
 static void
 sort_chain_flat(struct rb_root *rb_root, struct callchain_root *root,
-		u64 min_hit, struct callchain_param *param __used)
+		u64 min_hit, struct callchain_param *param __maybe_unused)
 {
 	__sort_chain_flat(rb_root, &root->node, min_hit);
 }
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static void __sort_chain_graph_abs(struct callchain_node *node,
 
 static void
 sort_chain_graph_abs(struct rb_root *rb_root, struct callchain_root *chain_root,
-		     u64 min_hit, struct callchain_param *param __used)
+		     u64 min_hit, struct callchain_param *param __maybe_unused)
 {
 	__sort_chain_graph_abs(&chain_root->node, min_hit);
 	rb_root->rb_node = chain_root->node.rb_root.rb_node;
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static void __sort_chain_graph_rel(struct callchain_node *node,
 
 static void
 sort_chain_graph_rel(struct rb_root *rb_root, struct callchain_root *chain_root,
-		     u64 min_hit __used, struct callchain_param *param)
+		     u64 min_hit __maybe_unused, struct callchain_param *param)
 {
 	__sort_chain_graph_rel(&chain_root->node, param->min_percent / 100.0);
 	rb_root->rb_node = chain_root->node.rb_root.rb_node;