diff options
author | Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com> | 2019-10-01 11:10:52 +1000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com> | 2019-10-01 15:45:03 +0200 |
commit | f5a1a536fa14895ccff4e94e6a5af90901ce86aa (patch) | |
tree | 04c131cf6206c2dc929dd2ccf6341adfa1a2e814 /lib/test_user_copy.c | |
parent | 54ecb8f7028c5eb3d740bb82b0f1d90f2df63c5c (diff) | |
download | blackbird-op-linux-f5a1a536fa14895ccff4e94e6a5af90901ce86aa.tar.gz blackbird-op-linux-f5a1a536fa14895ccff4e94e6a5af90901ce86aa.zip |
lib: introduce copy_struct_from_user() helper
A common pattern for syscall extensions is increasing the size of a
struct passed from userspace, such that the zero-value of the new fields
result in the old kernel behaviour (allowing for a mix of userspace and
kernel vintages to operate on one another in most cases).
While this interface exists for communication in both directions, only
one interface is straightforward to have reasonable semantics for
(userspace passing a struct to the kernel). For kernel returns to
userspace, what the correct semantics are (whether there should be an
error if userspace is unaware of a new extension) is very
syscall-dependent and thus probably cannot be unified between syscalls
(a good example of this problem is [1]).
Previously there was no common lib/ function that implemented
the necessary extension-checking semantics (and different syscalls
implemented them slightly differently or incompletely[2]). Future
patches replace common uses of this pattern to make use of
copy_struct_from_user().
Some in-kernel selftests that insure that the handling of alignment and
various byte patterns are all handled identically to memchr_inv() usage.
[1]: commit 1251201c0d34 ("sched/core: Fix uclamp ABI bug, clean up and
robustify sched_read_attr() ABI logic and code")
[2]: For instance {sched_setattr,perf_event_open,clone3}(2) all do do
similar checks to copy_struct_from_user() while rt_sigprocmask(2)
always rejects differently-sized struct arguments.
Suggested-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191001011055.19283-2-cyphar@cyphar.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/test_user_copy.c')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/test_user_copy.c | 136 |
1 files changed, 130 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/lib/test_user_copy.c b/lib/test_user_copy.c index 67bcd5dfd847..950ee88cd6ac 100644 --- a/lib/test_user_copy.c +++ b/lib/test_user_copy.c @@ -31,14 +31,133 @@ # define TEST_U64 #endif -#define test(condition, msg) \ -({ \ - int cond = (condition); \ - if (cond) \ - pr_warn("%s\n", msg); \ - cond; \ +#define test(condition, msg, ...) \ +({ \ + int cond = (condition); \ + if (cond) \ + pr_warn("[%d] " msg "\n", __LINE__, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ + cond; \ }) +static bool is_zeroed(void *from, size_t size) +{ + return memchr_inv(from, 0x0, size) == NULL; +} + +static int test_check_nonzero_user(char *kmem, char __user *umem, size_t size) +{ + int ret = 0; + size_t start, end, i; + size_t zero_start = size / 4; + size_t zero_end = size - zero_start; + + /* + * We conduct a series of check_nonzero_user() tests on a block of memory + * with the following byte-pattern (trying every possible [start,end] + * pair): + * + * [ 00 ff 00 ff ... 00 00 00 00 ... ff 00 ff 00 ] + * + * And we verify that check_nonzero_user() acts identically to memchr_inv(). + */ + + memset(kmem, 0x0, size); + for (i = 1; i < zero_start; i += 2) + kmem[i] = 0xff; + for (i = zero_end; i < size; i += 2) + kmem[i] = 0xff; + + ret |= test(copy_to_user(umem, kmem, size), + "legitimate copy_to_user failed"); + + for (start = 0; start <= size; start++) { + for (end = start; end <= size; end++) { + size_t len = end - start; + int retval = check_zeroed_user(umem + start, len); + int expected = is_zeroed(kmem + start, len); + + ret |= test(retval != expected, + "check_nonzero_user(=%d) != memchr_inv(=%d) mismatch (start=%zu, end=%zu)", + retval, expected, start, end); + } + } + + return ret; +} + +static int test_copy_struct_from_user(char *kmem, char __user *umem, + size_t size) +{ + int ret = 0; + char *umem_src = NULL, *expected = NULL; + size_t ksize, usize; + + umem_src = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); + if (ret |= test(umem_src == NULL, "kmalloc failed")) + goto out_free; + + expected = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); + if (ret |= test(expected == NULL, "kmalloc failed")) + goto out_free; + + /* Fill umem with a fixed byte pattern. */ + memset(umem_src, 0x3e, size); + ret |= test(copy_to_user(umem, umem_src, size), + "legitimate copy_to_user failed"); + + /* Check basic case -- (usize == ksize). */ + ksize = size; + usize = size; + + memcpy(expected, umem_src, ksize); + + memset(kmem, 0x0, size); + ret |= test(copy_struct_from_user(kmem, ksize, umem, usize), + "copy_struct_from_user(usize == ksize) failed"); + ret |= test(memcmp(kmem, expected, ksize), + "copy_struct_from_user(usize == ksize) gives unexpected copy"); + + /* Old userspace case -- (usize < ksize). */ + ksize = size; + usize = size / 2; + + memcpy(expected, umem_src, usize); + memset(expected + usize, 0x0, ksize - usize); + + memset(kmem, 0x0, size); + ret |= test(copy_struct_from_user(kmem, ksize, umem, usize), + "copy_struct_from_user(usize < ksize) failed"); + ret |= test(memcmp(kmem, expected, ksize), + "copy_struct_from_user(usize < ksize) gives unexpected copy"); + + /* New userspace (-E2BIG) case -- (usize > ksize). */ + ksize = size / 2; + usize = size; + + memset(kmem, 0x0, size); + ret |= test(copy_struct_from_user(kmem, ksize, umem, usize) != -E2BIG, + "copy_struct_from_user(usize > ksize) didn't give E2BIG"); + + /* New userspace (success) case -- (usize > ksize). */ + ksize = size / 2; + usize = size; + + memcpy(expected, umem_src, ksize); + ret |= test(clear_user(umem + ksize, usize - ksize), + "legitimate clear_user failed"); + + memset(kmem, 0x0, size); + ret |= test(copy_struct_from_user(kmem, ksize, umem, usize), + "copy_struct_from_user(usize > ksize) failed"); + ret |= test(memcmp(kmem, expected, ksize), + "copy_struct_from_user(usize > ksize) gives unexpected copy"); + +out_free: + kfree(expected); + kfree(umem_src); + return ret; +} + static int __init test_user_copy_init(void) { int ret = 0; @@ -106,6 +225,11 @@ static int __init test_user_copy_init(void) #endif #undef test_legit + /* Test usage of check_nonzero_user(). */ + ret |= test_check_nonzero_user(kmem, usermem, 2 * PAGE_SIZE); + /* Test usage of copy_struct_from_user(). */ + ret |= test_copy_struct_from_user(kmem, usermem, 2 * PAGE_SIZE); + /* * Invalid usage: none of these copies should succeed. */ |