diff options
author | Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> | 2015-02-12 20:59:13 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2015-02-18 14:27:40 +0100 |
commit | bc9560155f4063bbc9be71bd69d6726d41b47653 (patch) | |
tree | 9d4be1d4a9526b0b0d9e74cfb335ad696195685f /kernel | |
parent | 06b1f8083d6ed379ec1207a96339f23e8f7abfcf (diff) | |
download | blackbird-op-linux-bc9560155f4063bbc9be71bd69d6726d41b47653.tar.gz blackbird-op-linux-bc9560155f4063bbc9be71bd69d6726d41b47653.zip |
sched/completion: Serialize completion_done() with complete()
Commit de30ec47302c "Remove unnecessary ->wait.lock serialization when
reading completion state" was not correct, without lock/unlock the code
like stop_machine_from_inactive_cpu()
while (!completion_done())
cpu_relax();
can return before complete() finishes its spin_unlock() which writes to
this memory. And spin_unlock_wait().
While at it, change try_wait_for_completion() to use READ_ONCE().
Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
[ Added a comment with the barrier. ]
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>
Cc: raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: waiman.long@hp.com
Fixes: de30ec47302c ("sched/completion: Remove unnecessary ->wait.lock serialization when reading completion state")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150212195913.GA30430@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/completion.c | 19 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/completion.c b/kernel/sched/completion.c index 7052d3fd4e7b..8d0f35debf35 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/completion.c +++ b/kernel/sched/completion.c @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ bool try_wait_for_completion(struct completion *x) * first without taking the lock so we can * return early in the blocking case. */ - if (!ACCESS_ONCE(x->done)) + if (!READ_ONCE(x->done)) return 0; spin_lock_irqsave(&x->wait.lock, flags); @@ -297,6 +297,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_wait_for_completion); */ bool completion_done(struct completion *x) { - return !!ACCESS_ONCE(x->done); + if (!READ_ONCE(x->done)) + return false; + + /* + * If ->done, we need to wait for complete() to release ->wait.lock + * otherwise we can end up freeing the completion before complete() + * is done referencing it. + * + * The RMB pairs with complete()'s RELEASE of ->wait.lock and orders + * the loads of ->done and ->wait.lock such that we cannot observe + * the lock before complete() acquires it while observing the ->done + * after it's acquired the lock. + */ + smp_rmb(); + spin_unlock_wait(&x->wait.lock); + return true; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(completion_done); |