Merge drm-fixes-for-v4.17-rc6-urgent into drm-next

Need to backmerge some nouveau fixes to reduce
the nouveau -next conflicts a lot.

Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 14 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index d2c6083304b4..e13df951aca7 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -305,7 +305,8 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
 	 * Do not reduce the frequency if the CPU has not been idle
 	 * recently, as the reduction is likely to be premature then.
 	 */
-	if (busy && next_f < sg_policy->next_freq) {
+	if (busy && next_f < sg_policy->next_freq &&
+	    sg_policy->next_freq != UINT_MAX) {
 		next_f = sg_policy->next_freq;
 
 		/* Reset cached freq as next_freq has changed */
@@ -396,19 +397,6 @@ static void sugov_irq_work(struct irq_work *irq_work)
 
 	sg_policy = container_of(irq_work, struct sugov_policy, irq_work);
 
-	/*
-	 * For RT tasks, the schedutil governor shoots the frequency to maximum.
-	 * Special care must be taken to ensure that this kthread doesn't result
-	 * in the same behavior.
-	 *
-	 * This is (mostly) guaranteed by the work_in_progress flag. The flag is
-	 * updated only at the end of the sugov_work() function and before that
-	 * the schedutil governor rejects all other frequency scaling requests.
-	 *
-	 * There is a very rare case though, where the RT thread yields right
-	 * after the work_in_progress flag is cleared. The effects of that are
-	 * neglected for now.
-	 */
 	kthread_queue_work(&sg_policy->worker, &sg_policy->work);
 }