diff options
author | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2011-11-21 12:32:22 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2011-11-21 12:32:22 -0800 |
commit | a0acae0e886d44bd5ce6d2f173c1ace0fcf0d9f6 (patch) | |
tree | 0b763388360a5a9043986e1f2201e43df74ebc46 /Documentation | |
parent | 3a7cbd50f74907580eb47a8d08e1f29741b81abf (diff) | |
download | blackbird-op-linux-a0acae0e886d44bd5ce6d2f173c1ace0fcf0d9f6.tar.gz blackbird-op-linux-a0acae0e886d44bd5ce6d2f173c1ace0fcf0d9f6.zip |
freezer: unexport refrigerator() and update try_to_freeze() slightly
There is no reason to export two functions for entering the
refrigerator. Calling refrigerator() instead of try_to_freeze()
doesn't save anything noticeable or removes any race condition.
* Rename refrigerator() to __refrigerator() and make it return bool
indicating whether it scheduled out for freezing.
* Update try_to_freeze() to return bool and relay the return value of
__refrigerator() if freezing().
* Convert all refrigerator() users to try_to_freeze().
* Update documentation accordingly.
* While at it, add might_sleep() to try_to_freeze().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <samuel@sortiz.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: KONISHI Ryusuke <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt | 12 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt b/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt index 587e0828053f..3ab9fbd2800a 100644 --- a/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt +++ b/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ freeze_processes() (defined in kernel/power/process.c) is called. It executes try_to_freeze_tasks() that sets TIF_FREEZE for all of the freezable tasks and either wakes them up, if they are kernel threads, or sends fake signals to them, if they are user space processes. A task that has TIF_FREEZE set, should react -to it by calling the function called refrigerator() (defined in +to it by calling the function called __refrigerator() (defined in kernel/freezer.c), which sets the task's PF_FROZEN flag, changes its state to TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE and makes it loop until PF_FROZEN is cleared for it. Then, we say that the task is 'frozen' and therefore the set of functions @@ -29,10 +29,10 @@ handling this mechanism is referred to as 'the freezer' (these functions are defined in kernel/power/process.c, kernel/freezer.c & include/linux/freezer.h). User space processes are generally frozen before kernel threads. -It is not recommended to call refrigerator() directly. Instead, it is -recommended to use the try_to_freeze() function (defined in -include/linux/freezer.h), that checks the task's TIF_FREEZE flag and makes the -task enter refrigerator() if the flag is set. +__refrigerator() must not be called directly. Instead, use the +try_to_freeze() function (defined in include/linux/freezer.h), that checks +the task's TIF_FREEZE flag and makes the task enter __refrigerator() if the +flag is set. For user space processes try_to_freeze() is called automatically from the signal-handling code, but the freezable kernel threads need to call it @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ wait_event_freezable() and wait_event_freezable_timeout() macros. After the system memory state has been restored from a hibernation image and devices have been reinitialized, the function thaw_processes() is called in order to clear the PF_FROZEN flag for each frozen task. Then, the tasks that -have been frozen leave refrigerator() and continue running. +have been frozen leave __refrigerator() and continue running. III. Which kernel threads are freezable? |