diff options
author | Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> | 2019-08-02 15:59:43 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2019-08-06 12:49:18 +0200 |
commit | f4904815f97a934258445a8f763f6b6c48f007e7 (patch) | |
tree | 79166e57fd917a0b11c1db51870c1dae50f7a77b | |
parent | e21a712a9685488f5ce80495b37b9fdbe96c230d (diff) | |
download | blackbird-op-linux-f4904815f97a934258445a8f763f6b6c48f007e7.tar.gz blackbird-op-linux-f4904815f97a934258445a8f763f6b6c48f007e7.zip |
sched/deadline: Fix double accounting of rq/running bw in push & pull
{push,pull}_dl_task() always calls {de,}activate_task() with .flags=0
which sets p->on_rq=TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING.
{push,pull}_dl_task()->{de,}activate_task()->{de,en}queue_task()->
{de,en}queue_task_dl() calls {sub,add}_{running,rq}_bw() since
p->on_rq==TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING.
So {sub,add}_{running,rq}_bw() in {push,pull}_dl_task() is
double-accounting for that task.
Fix it by removing rq/running bw accounting in [push/pull]_dl_task().
Fixes: 7dd778841164 ("sched/core: Unify p->on_rq updates")
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190802145945.18702-2-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/deadline.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c index ef5b9f6b1d42..46122edd8552 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c @@ -2088,17 +2088,13 @@ retry: } deactivate_task(rq, next_task, 0); - sub_running_bw(&next_task->dl, &rq->dl); - sub_rq_bw(&next_task->dl, &rq->dl); set_task_cpu(next_task, later_rq->cpu); - add_rq_bw(&next_task->dl, &later_rq->dl); /* * Update the later_rq clock here, because the clock is used * by the cpufreq_update_util() inside __add_running_bw(). */ update_rq_clock(later_rq); - add_running_bw(&next_task->dl, &later_rq->dl); activate_task(later_rq, next_task, ENQUEUE_NOCLOCK); ret = 1; @@ -2186,11 +2182,7 @@ static void pull_dl_task(struct rq *this_rq) resched = true; deactivate_task(src_rq, p, 0); - sub_running_bw(&p->dl, &src_rq->dl); - sub_rq_bw(&p->dl, &src_rq->dl); set_task_cpu(p, this_cpu); - add_rq_bw(&p->dl, &this_rq->dl); - add_running_bw(&p->dl, &this_rq->dl); activate_task(this_rq, p, 0); dmin = p->dl.deadline; |