diff options
| author | Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> | 2015-10-05 17:47:49 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2015-10-07 11:34:06 +0200 |
| commit | a76cf66e948afbaeda8e3ecc861f29c47a026c27 (patch) | |
| tree | c0d0516f043b138d3172f3324eaf7bc1ed33e928 | |
| parent | 25a9a924c0c8723ced99179eb639e8c5372a2557 (diff) | |
| download | blackbird-op-linux-a76cf66e948afbaeda8e3ecc861f29c47a026c27.tar.gz blackbird-op-linux-a76cf66e948afbaeda8e3ecc861f29c47a026c27.zip | |
x86/uaccess: Tell the compiler that uaccess is unlikely to fault
GCC doesn't realize that get_user(), put_user(), and their __
variants are unlikely to fail. Tell it.
I noticed this while playing with the C entry code.
Before:
text data bss dec filename
21828763 5194760 1277952 28301475 vmlinux.baseline
After:
text data bss dec filename
21828379 5194760 1277952 28301091 vmlinux.new
The generated code shrunk by 384 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/dc37bed7024319c3004d950d57151fca6aeacf97.1444091584.git.luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h index a8df874f3e88..3e911c68876e 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ __typeof__(__builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(x) > sizeof(0UL), 0ULL, 0UL)) : "=a" (__ret_gu), "=r" (__val_gu) \ : "0" (ptr), "i" (sizeof(*(ptr)))); \ (x) = (__force __typeof__(*(ptr))) __val_gu; \ - __ret_gu; \ + __builtin_expect(__ret_gu, 0); \ }) #define __put_user_x(size, x, ptr, __ret_pu) \ @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ extern void __put_user_8(void); __put_user_x(X, __pu_val, ptr, __ret_pu); \ break; \ } \ - __ret_pu; \ + __builtin_expect(__ret_pu, 0); \ }) #define __put_user_size(x, ptr, size, retval, errret) \ @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ do { \ ({ \ int __pu_err; \ __put_user_size((x), (ptr), (size), __pu_err, -EFAULT); \ - __pu_err; \ + __builtin_expect(__pu_err, 0); \ }) #define __get_user_nocheck(x, ptr, size) \ @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ do { \ unsigned long __gu_val; \ __get_user_size(__gu_val, (ptr), (size), __gu_err, -EFAULT); \ (x) = (__force __typeof__(*(ptr)))__gu_val; \ - __gu_err; \ + __builtin_expect(__gu_err, 0); \ }) /* FIXME: this hack is definitely wrong -AK */ |
