diff options
author | Paul Menage <menage@google.com> | 2009-01-07 18:08:36 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2009-01-08 08:31:10 -0800 |
commit | 999cd8a450f8f93701669a61cac4d3b19eca07e8 (patch) | |
tree | 990e5b08e6db971d2e9943f89abf39e7c8f4cb1e | |
parent | b5a84319a4343a0db753436fd8147e61eaafa7ea (diff) | |
download | blackbird-op-linux-999cd8a450f8f93701669a61cac4d3b19eca07e8.tar.gz blackbird-op-linux-999cd8a450f8f93701669a61cac4d3b19eca07e8.zip |
cgroups: add a per-subsystem hierarchy_mutex
These patches introduce new locking/refcount support for cgroups to
reduce the need for subsystems to call cgroup_lock(). This will
ultimately allow the atomicity of cgroup_rmdir() (which was removed
recently) to be restored.
These three patches give:
1/3 - introduce a per-subsystem hierarchy_mutex which a subsystem can
use to prevent changes to its own cgroup tree
2/3 - use hierarchy_mutex in place of calling cgroup_lock() in the
memory controller
3/3 - introduce a css_tryget() function similar to the one recently
proposed by Kamezawa, but avoiding spurious refcount failures in
the event of a race between a css_tryget() and an unsuccessful
cgroup_rmdir()
Future patches will likely involve:
- using hierarchy mutex in place of cgroup_lock() in more subsystems
where appropriate
- restoring the atomicity of cgroup_rmdir() with respect to cgroup_create()
This patch:
Add a hierarchy_mutex to the cgroup_subsys object that protects changes to
the hierarchy observed by that subsystem. It is taken by the cgroup
subsystem (in addition to cgroup_mutex) for the following operations:
- linking a cgroup into that subsystem's cgroup tree
- unlinking a cgroup from that subsystem's cgroup tree
- moving the subsystem to/from a hierarchy (including across the
bind() callback)
Thus if the subsystem holds its own hierarchy_mutex, it can safely
traverse its own hierarchy.
Signed-off-by: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Tested-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/cgroup.h | 17 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/cgroup.c | 37 |
3 files changed, 52 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt index 60287e9e9d27..e33ee74eee77 100644 --- a/Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt +++ b/Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ example in cpusets, no task may attach before 'cpus' and 'mems' are set up. void bind(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *root) -(cgroup_mutex held by caller) +(cgroup_mutex and ss->hierarchy_mutex held by caller) Called when a cgroup subsystem is rebound to a different hierarchy and root cgroup. Currently this will only involve movement between diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h index 73d1c730c3c4..ce1c1f34c30c 100644 --- a/include/linux/cgroup.h +++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h @@ -340,8 +340,23 @@ struct cgroup_subsys { #define MAX_CGROUP_TYPE_NAMELEN 32 const char *name; - struct cgroupfs_root *root; + /* + * Protects sibling/children links of cgroups in this + * hierarchy, plus protects which hierarchy (or none) the + * subsystem is a part of (i.e. root/sibling). To avoid + * potential deadlocks, the following operations should not be + * undertaken while holding any hierarchy_mutex: + * + * - allocating memory + * - initiating hotplug events + */ + struct mutex hierarchy_mutex; + /* + * Link to parent, and list entry in parent's children. + * Protected by this->hierarchy_mutex and cgroup_lock() + */ + struct cgroupfs_root *root; struct list_head sibling; }; diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c index 83ea4f524be5..8b6379cdf637 100644 --- a/kernel/cgroup.c +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c @@ -722,23 +722,26 @@ static int rebind_subsystems(struct cgroupfs_root *root, BUG_ON(cgrp->subsys[i]); BUG_ON(!dummytop->subsys[i]); BUG_ON(dummytop->subsys[i]->cgroup != dummytop); + mutex_lock(&ss->hierarchy_mutex); cgrp->subsys[i] = dummytop->subsys[i]; cgrp->subsys[i]->cgroup = cgrp; list_move(&ss->sibling, &root->subsys_list); ss->root = root; if (ss->bind) ss->bind(ss, cgrp); - + mutex_unlock(&ss->hierarchy_mutex); } else if (bit & removed_bits) { /* We're removing this subsystem */ BUG_ON(cgrp->subsys[i] != dummytop->subsys[i]); BUG_ON(cgrp->subsys[i]->cgroup != cgrp); + mutex_lock(&ss->hierarchy_mutex); if (ss->bind) ss->bind(ss, dummytop); dummytop->subsys[i]->cgroup = dummytop; cgrp->subsys[i] = NULL; subsys[i]->root = &rootnode; list_move(&ss->sibling, &rootnode.subsys_list); + mutex_unlock(&ss->hierarchy_mutex); } else if (bit & final_bits) { /* Subsystem state should already exist */ BUG_ON(!cgrp->subsys[i]); @@ -2338,6 +2341,29 @@ static void init_cgroup_css(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, cgrp->subsys[ss->subsys_id] = css; } +static void cgroup_lock_hierarchy(struct cgroupfs_root *root) +{ + /* We need to take each hierarchy_mutex in a consistent order */ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT; i++) { + struct cgroup_subsys *ss = subsys[i]; + if (ss->root == root) + mutex_lock_nested(&ss->hierarchy_mutex, i); + } +} + +static void cgroup_unlock_hierarchy(struct cgroupfs_root *root) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT; i++) { + struct cgroup_subsys *ss = subsys[i]; + if (ss->root == root) + mutex_unlock(&ss->hierarchy_mutex); + } +} + /* * cgroup_create - create a cgroup * @parent: cgroup that will be parent of the new cgroup @@ -2386,7 +2412,9 @@ static long cgroup_create(struct cgroup *parent, struct dentry *dentry, init_cgroup_css(css, ss, cgrp); } + cgroup_lock_hierarchy(root); list_add(&cgrp->sibling, &cgrp->parent->children); + cgroup_unlock_hierarchy(root); root->number_of_cgroups++; err = cgroup_create_dir(cgrp, dentry, mode); @@ -2504,8 +2532,12 @@ static int cgroup_rmdir(struct inode *unused_dir, struct dentry *dentry) if (!list_empty(&cgrp->release_list)) list_del(&cgrp->release_list); spin_unlock(&release_list_lock); - /* delete my sibling from parent->children */ + + cgroup_lock_hierarchy(cgrp->root); + /* delete this cgroup from parent->children */ list_del(&cgrp->sibling); + cgroup_unlock_hierarchy(cgrp->root); + spin_lock(&cgrp->dentry->d_lock); d = dget(cgrp->dentry); spin_unlock(&d->d_lock); @@ -2547,6 +2579,7 @@ static void __init cgroup_init_subsys(struct cgroup_subsys *ss) * need to invoke fork callbacks here. */ BUG_ON(!list_empty(&init_task.tasks)); + mutex_init(&ss->hierarchy_mutex); ss->active = 1; } |