[PATCH] Avoiding mmap fragmentation

Ingo recently introduced a great speedup for allocating new mmaps using the
free_area_cache pointer which boosts the specweb SSL benchmark by 4-5% and
causes huge performance increases in thread creation.

The downside of this patch is that it does lead to fragmentation in the
mmap-ed areas (visible via /proc/self/maps), such that some applications
that work fine under 2.4 kernels quickly run out of memory on any 2.6
kernel.

The problem is twofold:

  1) the free_area_cache is used to continue a search for memory where
     the last search ended.  Before the change new areas were always
     searched from the base address on.

     So now new small areas are cluttering holes of all sizes
     throughout the whole mmap-able region whereas before small holes
     tended to close holes near the base leaving holes far from the base
     large and available for larger requests.

  2) the free_area_cache also is set to the location of the last
     munmap-ed area so in scenarios where we allocate e.g.  five regions of
     1K each, then free regions 4 2 3 in this order the next request for 1K
     will be placed in the position of the old region 3, whereas before we
     appended it to the still active region 1, placing it at the location
     of the old region 2.  Before we had 1 free region of 2K, now we only
     get two free regions of 1K -> fragmentation.

The patch addresses thes issues by introducing yet another cache descriptor
cached_hole_size that contains the largest known hole size below the
current free_area_cache.  If a new request comes in the size is compared
against the cached_hole_size and if the request can be filled with a hole
below free_area_cache the search is started from the base instead.

The results look promising: Whereas 2.6.12-rc4 fragments quickly and my
(earlier posted) leakme.c test program terminates after 50000+ iterations
with 96 distinct and fragmented maps in /proc/self/maps it performs nicely
(as expected) with thread creation, Ingo's test_str02 with 20000 threads
requires 0.7s system time.

Taking out Ingo's patch (un-patch available per request) by basically
deleting all mentions of free_area_cache from the kernel and starting the
search for new memory always at the respective bases we observe: leakme
terminates successfully with 11 distinctive hardly fragmented areas in
/proc/self/maps but thread creating is gringdingly slow: 30+s(!) system
time for Ingo's test_str02 with 20000 threads.

Now - drumroll ;-) the appended patch works fine with leakme: it ends with
only 7 distinct areas in /proc/self/maps and also thread creation seems
sufficiently fast with 0.71s for 20000 threads.

Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Wander <wwc@rentec.com>
Credit-to: "Richard Purdie" <rpurdie@rpsys.net>
Signed-off-by: Ken Chen <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> (partly)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 40 insertions, 13 deletions

diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index de54acd9942f..9da23c1ef9dc 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -1175,7 +1175,12 @@ arch_get_unmapped_area(struct file *filp, unsigned long addr,
 		    (!vma || addr + len <= vma->vm_start))
 			return addr;
 	}
-	start_addr = addr = mm->free_area_cache;
+	if (len > mm->cached_hole_size) {
+	        start_addr = addr = mm->free_area_cache;
+	} else {
+	        start_addr = addr = TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE;
+	        mm->cached_hole_size = 0;
+	}
 
 full_search:
 	for (vma = find_vma(mm, addr); ; vma = vma->vm_next) {
@@ -1186,7 +1191,9 @@ full_search:
 			 * some holes.
 			 */
 			if (start_addr != TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE) {
-				start_addr = addr = TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE;
+				addr = TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE;
+			        start_addr = addr;
+				mm->cached_hole_size = 0;
 				goto full_search;
 			}
 			return -ENOMEM;
@@ -1198,19 +1205,22 @@ full_search:
 			mm->free_area_cache = addr + len;
 			return addr;
 		}
+		if (addr + mm->cached_hole_size < vma->vm_start)
+		        mm->cached_hole_size = vma->vm_start - addr;
 		addr = vma->vm_end;
 	}
 }
 #endif	
 
-void arch_unmap_area(struct vm_area_struct *area)
+void arch_unmap_area(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
 {
 	/*
 	 * Is this a new hole at the lowest possible address?
 	 */
-	if (area->vm_start >= TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE &&
-			area->vm_start < area->vm_mm->free_area_cache)
-		area->vm_mm->free_area_cache = area->vm_start;
+	if (addr >= TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE && addr < mm->free_area_cache) {
+		mm->free_area_cache = addr;
+		mm->cached_hole_size = ~0UL;
+	}
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1240,6 +1250,12 @@ arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown(struct file *filp, const unsigned long addr0,
 			return addr;
 	}
 
+	/* check if free_area_cache is useful for us */
+	if (len <= mm->cached_hole_size) {
+ 	        mm->cached_hole_size = 0;
+ 		mm->free_area_cache = mm->mmap_base;
+ 	}
+
 	/* either no address requested or can't fit in requested address hole */
 	addr = mm->free_area_cache;
 
@@ -1264,6 +1280,10 @@ arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown(struct file *filp, const unsigned long addr0,
 			/* remember the address as a hint for next time */
 			return (mm->free_area_cache = addr);
 
+ 		/* remember the largest hole we saw so far */
+ 		if (addr + mm->cached_hole_size < vma->vm_start)
+ 		        mm->cached_hole_size = vma->vm_start - addr;
+
 		/* try just below the current vma->vm_start */
 		addr = vma->vm_start-len;
 	} while (len < vma->vm_start);
@@ -1274,28 +1294,30 @@ arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown(struct file *filp, const unsigned long addr0,
 	 * can happen with large stack limits and large mmap()
 	 * allocations.
 	 */
-	mm->free_area_cache = TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE;
+	mm->cached_hole_size = ~0UL;
+  	mm->free_area_cache = TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE;
 	addr = arch_get_unmapped_area(filp, addr0, len, pgoff, flags);
 	/*
 	 * Restore the topdown base:
 	 */
 	mm->free_area_cache = mm->mmap_base;
+	mm->cached_hole_size = ~0UL;
 
 	return addr;
 }
 #endif
 
-void arch_unmap_area_topdown(struct vm_area_struct *area)
+void arch_unmap_area_topdown(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
 {
 	/*
 	 * Is this a new hole at the highest possible address?
 	 */
-	if (area->vm_end > area->vm_mm->free_area_cache)
-		area->vm_mm->free_area_cache = area->vm_end;
+	if (addr > mm->free_area_cache)
+		mm->free_area_cache = addr;
 
 	/* dont allow allocations above current base */
-	if (area->vm_mm->free_area_cache > area->vm_mm->mmap_base)
-		area->vm_mm->free_area_cache = area->vm_mm->mmap_base;
+	if (mm->free_area_cache > mm->mmap_base)
+		mm->free_area_cache = mm->mmap_base;
 }
 
 unsigned long
@@ -1595,7 +1617,6 @@ static void unmap_vma(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *area)
 	if (area->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
 		area->vm_mm->locked_vm -= len >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 	vm_stat_unaccount(area);
-	area->vm_mm->unmap_area(area);
 	remove_vm_struct(area);
 }
 
@@ -1649,6 +1670,7 @@ detach_vmas_to_be_unmapped(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 {
 	struct vm_area_struct **insertion_point;
 	struct vm_area_struct *tail_vma = NULL;
+	unsigned long addr;
 
 	insertion_point = (prev ? &prev->vm_next : &mm->mmap);
 	do {
@@ -1659,6 +1681,11 @@ detach_vmas_to_be_unmapped(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	} while (vma && vma->vm_start < end);
 	*insertion_point = vma;
 	tail_vma->vm_next = NULL;
+	if (mm->unmap_area == arch_unmap_area)
+		addr = prev ? prev->vm_end : mm->mmap_base;
+	else
+		addr = vma ?  vma->vm_start : mm->mmap_base;
+	mm->unmap_area(mm, addr);
 	mm->mmap_cache = NULL;		/* Kill the cache. */
 }