diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2014-12-10 09:01:01 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2014-12-10 09:01:01 -0800 |
commit | 9e66645d72d3c395da92b0f8855c787f4b5f0e89 (patch) | |
tree | 61b94adb6c32340c45b6d984837556b6b845e983 /kernel/irq/chip.c | |
parent | ecb50f0afd35a51ef487e8a54b976052eb03d729 (diff) | |
parent | 74faaf7aa64c76b60db0f5c994fd43a46be772ce (diff) | |
download | blackbird-obmc-linux-9e66645d72d3c395da92b0f8855c787f4b5f0e89.tar.gz blackbird-obmc-linux-9e66645d72d3c395da92b0f8855c787f4b5f0e89.zip |
Merge branch 'irq-irqdomain-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull irq domain updates from Thomas Gleixner:
"The real interesting irq updates:
- Support for hierarchical irq domains:
For complex interrupt routing scenarios where more than one
interrupt related chip is involved we had no proper representation
in the generic interrupt infrastructure so far. That made people
implement rather ugly constructs in their nested irq chip
implementations. The main offenders are x86 and arm/gic.
To distangle that mess we have now hierarchical irqdomains which
seperate the various interrupt chips and connect them via the
hierarchical domains. That keeps the domain specific details
internal to the particular hierarchy level and removes the
criss/cross referencing of chip internals. The resulting hierarchy
for a complex x86 system will look like this:
vector mapped: 74
msi-0 mapped: 2
dmar-ir-1 mapped: 69
ioapic-1 mapped: 4
ioapic-0 mapped: 20
pci-msi-2 mapped: 45
dmar-ir-0 mapped: 3
ioapic-2 mapped: 1
pci-msi-1 mapped: 2
htirq mapped: 0
Neither ioapic nor pci-msi know about the dmar interrupt remapping
between themself and the vector domain. If interrupt remapping is
disabled ioapic and pci-msi become direct childs of the vector
domain.
In hindsight we should have done that years ago, but in hindsight
we always know better :)
- Support for generic MSI interrupt domain handling
We have more and more non PCI related MSI interrupts, so providing
a generic infrastructure for this is better than having all
affected architectures implementing their own private hacks.
- Support for PCI-MSI interrupt domain handling, based on the generic
MSI support.
This part carries the pci/msi branch from Bjorn Helgaas pci tree to
avoid a massive conflict. The PCI/MSI parts are acked by Bjorn.
I have two more branches on top of this. The full conversion of x86
to hierarchical domains and a partial conversion of arm/gic"
* 'irq-irqdomain-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (41 commits)
genirq: Move irq_chip_write_msi_msg() helper to core
PCI/MSI: Allow an msi_controller to be associated to an irq domain
PCI/MSI: Provide mechanism to alloc/free MSI/MSIX interrupt from irqdomain
PCI/MSI: Enhance core to support hierarchy irqdomain
PCI/MSI: Move cached entry functions to irq core
genirq: Provide default callbacks for msi_domain_ops
genirq: Introduce msi_domain_alloc/free_irqs()
asm-generic: Add msi.h
genirq: Add generic msi irq domain support
genirq: Introduce callback irq_chip.irq_write_msi_msg
genirq: Work around __irq_set_handler vs stacked domains ordering issues
irqdomain: Introduce helper function irq_domain_add_hierarchy()
irqdomain: Implement a method to automatically call parent domains alloc/free
genirq: Introduce helper irq_domain_set_info() to reduce duplicated code
genirq: Split out flow handler typedefs into seperate header file
genirq: Add IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE to support stacked irqchip
genirq: Introduce irq_chip.irq_compose_msi_msg() to support stacked irqchip
genirq: Add more helper functions to support stacked irq_chip
genirq: Introduce helper functions to support stacked irq_chip
irqdomain: Do irq_find_mapping and set_type for hierarchy irqdomain in case OF
...
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/irq/chip.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/irq/chip.c | 130 |
1 files changed, 129 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c index e5202f00cabc..6f1c7a566b95 100644 --- a/kernel/irq/chip.c +++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/kernel_stat.h> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h> #include <trace/events/irq.h> @@ -178,6 +179,7 @@ int irq_startup(struct irq_desc *desc, bool resend) irq_state_clr_disabled(desc); desc->depth = 0; + irq_domain_activate_irq(&desc->irq_data); if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_startup) { ret = desc->irq_data.chip->irq_startup(&desc->irq_data); irq_state_clr_masked(desc); @@ -199,6 +201,7 @@ void irq_shutdown(struct irq_desc *desc) desc->irq_data.chip->irq_disable(&desc->irq_data); else desc->irq_data.chip->irq_mask(&desc->irq_data); + irq_domain_deactivate_irq(&desc->irq_data); irq_state_set_masked(desc); } @@ -728,7 +731,30 @@ __irq_set_handler(unsigned int irq, irq_flow_handler_t handle, int is_chained, if (!handle) { handle = handle_bad_irq; } else { - if (WARN_ON(desc->irq_data.chip == &no_irq_chip)) + struct irq_data *irq_data = &desc->irq_data; +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY + /* + * With hierarchical domains we might run into a + * situation where the outermost chip is not yet set + * up, but the inner chips are there. Instead of + * bailing we install the handler, but obviously we + * cannot enable/startup the interrupt at this point. + */ + while (irq_data) { + if (irq_data->chip != &no_irq_chip) + break; + /* + * Bail out if the outer chip is not set up + * and the interrrupt supposed to be started + * right away. + */ + if (WARN_ON(is_chained)) + goto out; + /* Try the parent */ + irq_data = irq_data->parent_data; + } +#endif + if (WARN_ON(!irq_data || irq_data->chip == &no_irq_chip)) goto out; } @@ -847,3 +873,105 @@ void irq_cpu_offline(void) raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags); } } + +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY +/** + * irq_chip_ack_parent - Acknowledge the parent interrupt + * @data: Pointer to interrupt specific data + */ +void irq_chip_ack_parent(struct irq_data *data) +{ + data = data->parent_data; + data->chip->irq_ack(data); +} + +/** + * irq_chip_mask_parent - Mask the parent interrupt + * @data: Pointer to interrupt specific data + */ +void irq_chip_mask_parent(struct irq_data *data) +{ + data = data->parent_data; + data->chip->irq_mask(data); +} + +/** + * irq_chip_unmask_parent - Unmask the parent interrupt + * @data: Pointer to interrupt specific data + */ +void irq_chip_unmask_parent(struct irq_data *data) +{ + data = data->parent_data; + data->chip->irq_unmask(data); +} + +/** + * irq_chip_eoi_parent - Invoke EOI on the parent interrupt + * @data: Pointer to interrupt specific data + */ +void irq_chip_eoi_parent(struct irq_data *data) +{ + data = data->parent_data; + data->chip->irq_eoi(data); +} + +/** + * irq_chip_set_affinity_parent - Set affinity on the parent interrupt + * @data: Pointer to interrupt specific data + * @dest: The affinity mask to set + * @force: Flag to enforce setting (disable online checks) + * + * Conditinal, as the underlying parent chip might not implement it. + */ +int irq_chip_set_affinity_parent(struct irq_data *data, + const struct cpumask *dest, bool force) +{ + data = data->parent_data; + if (data->chip->irq_set_affinity) + return data->chip->irq_set_affinity(data, dest, force); + + return -ENOSYS; +} + +/** + * irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy - Retrigger an interrupt in hardware + * @data: Pointer to interrupt specific data + * + * Iterate through the domain hierarchy of the interrupt and check + * whether a hw retrigger function exists. If yes, invoke it. + */ +int irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy(struct irq_data *data) +{ + for (data = data->parent_data; data; data = data->parent_data) + if (data->chip && data->chip->irq_retrigger) + return data->chip->irq_retrigger(data); + + return -ENOSYS; +} +#endif + +/** + * irq_chip_compose_msi_msg - Componse msi message for a irq chip + * @data: Pointer to interrupt specific data + * @msg: Pointer to the MSI message + * + * For hierarchical domains we find the first chip in the hierarchy + * which implements the irq_compose_msi_msg callback. For non + * hierarchical we use the top level chip. + */ +int irq_chip_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg) +{ + struct irq_data *pos = NULL; + +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY + for (; data; data = data->parent_data) +#endif + if (data->chip && data->chip->irq_compose_msi_msg) + pos = data; + if (!pos) + return -ENOSYS; + + pos->chip->irq_compose_msi_msg(pos, msg); + + return 0; +} |