diff options
author | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2012-07-17 12:39:27 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2012-07-17 12:39:27 -0700 |
commit | bc2ae0f5bb2f39e6db06a62f9d353e4601a332a1 (patch) | |
tree | 3f1aa1f72566ac67234799fdd811ba63297de33c | |
parent | 6037315269d62bf967286ae2670fdd6b6acedab9 (diff) | |
download | blackbird-obmc-linux-bc2ae0f5bb2f39e6db06a62f9d353e4601a332a1.tar.gz blackbird-obmc-linux-bc2ae0f5bb2f39e6db06a62f9d353e4601a332a1.zip |
workqueue: drop @bind from create_worker()
Currently, create_worker()'s callers are responsible for deciding
whether the newly created worker should be bound to the associated CPU
and create_worker() sets WORKER_UNBOUND only for the workers for the
unbound global_cwq. Creation during normal operation is always via
maybe_create_worker() and @bind is true. For workers created during
hotplug, @bind is false.
Normal operation path is planned to be used even while the CPU is
going through hotplug operations or offline and this static decision
won't work.
Drop @bind from create_worker() and decide whether to bind by looking
at GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED. create_worker() will also set WORKER_UNBOUND
autmatically if disassociated. To avoid flipping GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED
while create_worker() is in progress, the flag is now allowed to be
changed only while holding all manager_mutexes on the global_cwq.
This requires that GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED is not cleared behind trustee's
back. CPU_ONLINE no longer clears DISASSOCIATED before flushing
trustee, which clears DISASSOCIATED before rebinding remaining workers
if asked to release. For cases where trustee isn't around, CPU_ONLINE
clears DISASSOCIATED after flushing trustee. Also, now, first_idle
has UNBOUND set on creation which is explicitly cleared by CPU_ONLINE
while binding it. These convolutions will soon be removed by further
simplification of CPU hotplug path.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/workqueue.c | 64 |
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index f7a00697d150..e1d05e51a80a 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -45,7 +45,22 @@ #include "workqueue_sched.h" enum { - /* global_cwq flags */ + /* + * global_cwq flags + * + * A bound gcwq is either associated or disassociated with its CPU. + * While associated (!DISASSOCIATED), all workers are bound to the + * CPU and none has %WORKER_UNBOUND set and concurrency management + * is in effect. + * + * While DISASSOCIATED, the cpu may be offline and all workers have + * %WORKER_UNBOUND set and concurrency management disabled, and may + * be executing on any CPU. The gcwq behaves as an unbound one. + * + * Note that DISASSOCIATED can be flipped only while holding + * managership of all pools on the gcwq to avoid changing binding + * state while create_worker() is in progress. + */ GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED = 1 << 0, /* cpu can't serve workers */ GCWQ_FREEZING = 1 << 1, /* freeze in progress */ @@ -1334,7 +1349,6 @@ static struct worker *alloc_worker(void) /** * create_worker - create a new workqueue worker * @pool: pool the new worker will belong to - * @bind: whether to set affinity to @cpu or not * * Create a new worker which is bound to @pool. The returned worker * can be started by calling start_worker() or destroyed using @@ -1346,10 +1360,9 @@ static struct worker *alloc_worker(void) * RETURNS: * Pointer to the newly created worker. */ -static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool, bool bind) +static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool) { struct global_cwq *gcwq = pool->gcwq; - bool on_unbound_cpu = gcwq->cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND; const char *pri = worker_pool_pri(pool) ? "H" : ""; struct worker *worker = NULL; int id = -1; @@ -1370,7 +1383,7 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool, bool bind) worker->pool = pool; worker->id = id; - if (!on_unbound_cpu) + if (gcwq->cpu != WORK_CPU_UNBOUND) worker->task = kthread_create_on_node(worker_thread, worker, cpu_to_node(gcwq->cpu), "kworker/%u:%d%s", gcwq->cpu, id, pri); @@ -1384,15 +1397,19 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool, bool bind) set_user_nice(worker->task, HIGHPRI_NICE_LEVEL); /* - * An unbound worker will become a regular one if CPU comes online - * later on. Make sure every worker has PF_THREAD_BOUND set. + * Determine CPU binding of the new worker depending on + * %GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED. The caller is responsible for ensuring the + * flag remains stable across this function. See the comments + * above the flag definition for details. + * + * As an unbound worker may later become a regular one if CPU comes + * online, make sure every worker has %PF_THREAD_BOUND set. */ - if (bind && !on_unbound_cpu) + if (!(gcwq->flags & GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED)) { kthread_bind(worker->task, gcwq->cpu); - else { + } else { worker->task->flags |= PF_THREAD_BOUND; - if (on_unbound_cpu) - worker->flags |= WORKER_UNBOUND; + worker->flags |= WORKER_UNBOUND; } return worker; @@ -1568,7 +1585,7 @@ restart: while (true) { struct worker *worker; - worker = create_worker(pool, true); + worker = create_worker(pool); if (worker) { del_timer_sync(&pool->mayday_timer); spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock); @@ -3420,12 +3437,10 @@ static int __cpuinit trustee_thread(void *__gcwq) if (need_to_create_worker(pool)) { spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock); - worker = create_worker(pool, false); + worker = create_worker(pool); spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock); - if (worker) { - worker->flags |= WORKER_UNBOUND; + if (worker) start_worker(worker); - } } } @@ -3463,6 +3478,10 @@ static int __cpuinit trustee_thread(void *__gcwq) for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq) WARN_ON(!list_empty(&pool->idle_list)); + /* if we're reassociating, clear DISASSOCIATED */ + if (gcwq->trustee_state == TRUSTEE_RELEASE) + gcwq->flags &= ~GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED; + for_each_busy_worker(worker, i, pos, gcwq) { struct work_struct *rebind_work = &worker->rebind_work; @@ -3546,7 +3565,7 @@ static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb, i = 0; for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq) { BUG_ON(pool->first_idle); - new_workers[i] = create_worker(pool, false); + new_workers[i] = create_worker(pool); if (!new_workers[i++]) goto err_destroy; } @@ -3584,7 +3603,6 @@ static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb, case CPU_DOWN_FAILED: case CPU_ONLINE: - gcwq->flags &= ~GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED; if (gcwq->trustee_state != TRUSTEE_DONE) { gcwq->trustee_state = TRUSTEE_RELEASE; wake_up_process(gcwq->trustee); @@ -3592,6 +3610,13 @@ static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb, } /* + * Either DISASSOCIATED is already cleared or no worker is + * left on the gcwq. Safe to clear DISASSOCIATED without + * claiming managers. + */ + gcwq->flags &= ~GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED; + + /* * Trustee is done and there might be no worker left. * Put the first_idle in and request a real manager to * take a look. @@ -3601,6 +3626,7 @@ static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb, kthread_bind(pool->first_idle->task, cpu); spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock); pool->flags |= POOL_MANAGE_WORKERS; + pool->first_idle->flags &= ~WORKER_UNBOUND; start_worker(pool->first_idle); pool->first_idle = NULL; } @@ -3899,7 +3925,7 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void) for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq) { struct worker *worker; - worker = create_worker(pool, true); + worker = create_worker(pool); BUG_ON(!worker); spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock); start_worker(worker); |