Only update SBEs on chips connected to powerbus

  - Fixes issue in istep 7 where HB was attempting
    to update the slave chip's SBE, as SBE update
    expects SBE PSU interface to be active

Change-Id: Id90f1b0f23c668a153a7e2725e762c761ee3c490
Reviewed-on: http://ralgit01.raleigh.ibm.com/gerrit1/36792
Tested-by: Jenkins Server <pfd-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Gloff <mgloff@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Jenkins OP Build CI <op-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: FSP CI Jenkins <fsp-CI-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Baiocchi <mbaiocch@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel M. Crowell <dcrowell@us.ibm.com>

1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/src/usr/sbe/sbe_update.C b/src/usr/sbe/sbe_update.C
index c73162479..0c97dd256 100644
--- a/src/usr/sbe/sbe_update.C
+++ b/src/usr/sbe/sbe_update.C
@@ -299,6 +299,24 @@ namespace SBE
                     }
                 }
 
+                //Can only update the SBE once the powerbus is up (secureboot)
+                //Use the scom switch Xscom capability flag as a proxy for
+                //powerbus access.  If we can't access via powerbus, then skip
+                TARGETING::ScomSwitches scomSetting =
+                      sbeState.target->getAttr<TARGETING::ATTR_SCOM_SWITCHES>();
+
+                if(!(scomSetting.useXscom))
+                {
+                    //Xscom is not viable on this chip, thus powerbus isn't
+                    //up to chip -- skip it
+                    TRACFCOMP( g_trac_sbe,
+                               INFO_MRK"updateProcessorSbeSeeproms(): "
+                               "Power bus not established to chip 0x%X,"
+                               " not performing update",
+                               TARGETING::get_huid(sbeState.target));
+                    continue;
+                }
+
                 err = getSbeInfoState(sbeState);
 
                 if (err)