1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
|
//===-- X86FixupBWInsts.cpp - Fixup Byte or Word instructions -----------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
/// \file
/// This file defines the pass that looks through the machine instructions
/// late in the compilation, and finds byte or word instructions that
/// can be profitably replaced with 32 bit instructions that give equivalent
/// results for the bits of the results that are used. There are two possible
/// reasons to do this.
///
/// One reason is to avoid false-dependences on the upper portions
/// of the registers. Only instructions that have a destination register
/// which is not in any of the source registers can be affected by this.
/// Any instruction where one of the source registers is also the destination
/// register is unaffected, because it has a true dependence on the source
/// register already. So, this consideration primarily affects load
/// instructions and register-to-register moves. It would
/// seem like cmov(s) would also be affected, but because of the way cmov is
/// really implemented by most machines as reading both the destination and
/// and source regsters, and then "merging" the two based on a condition,
/// it really already should be considered as having a true dependence on the
/// destination register as well.
///
/// The other reason to do this is for potential code size savings. Word
/// operations need an extra override byte compared to their 32 bit
/// versions. So this can convert many word operations to their larger
/// size, saving a byte in encoding. This could introduce partial register
/// dependences where none existed however. As an example take:
/// orw ax, $0x1000
/// addw ax, $3
/// now if this were to get transformed into
/// orw ax, $1000
/// addl eax, $3
/// because the addl encodes shorter than the addw, this would introduce
/// a use of a register that was only partially written earlier. On older
/// Intel processors this can be quite a performance penalty, so this should
/// probably only be done when it can be proven that a new partial dependence
/// wouldn't be created, or when your know a newer processor is being
/// targeted, or when optimizing for minimum code size.
///
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "X86.h"
#include "X86InstrInfo.h"
#include "X86Subtarget.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/LiveVariables.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstrBuilder.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineLoopInfo.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/Passes.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetInstrInfo.h"
using namespace llvm;
#define DEBUG_TYPE "x86-fixup-bw-insts"
// Option to allow this optimization pass to have fine-grained control.
// This is turned off by default so as not to affect a large number of
// existing lit tests.
static cl::opt<bool>
FixupBWInsts("fixup-byte-word-insts",
cl::desc("Change byte and word instructions to larger sizes"),
cl::init(false), cl::Hidden);
namespace {
class FixupBWInstPass : public MachineFunctionPass {
static char ID;
const char *getPassName() const override {
return "X86 Byte/Word Instruction Fixup";
}
/// \brief Loop over all of the instructions in the basic block
/// replacing applicable byte or word instructions with better
/// alternatives.
void processBasicBlock(MachineFunction &MF, MachineBasicBlock &MBB) const;
/// \brief This sets the \p SuperDestReg to the 32 bit super reg
/// of the original destination register of the MachineInstr
/// passed in. It returns true if that super register is dead
/// just prior to \p OrigMI, and false if not.
/// \pre OrigDestSize must be 8 or 16.
bool getSuperRegDestIfDead(MachineInstr *OrigMI, unsigned OrigDestSize,
unsigned &SuperDestReg) const;
/// \brief Change the MachineInstr \p MI into the equivalent extending load
/// to 32 bit register if it is safe to do so. Return the replacement
/// instruction if OK, otherwise return nullptr.
/// \pre OrigDestSize must be 8 or 16.
MachineInstr *tryReplaceLoad(unsigned New32BitOpcode, unsigned OrigDestSize,
MachineInstr *MI) const;
public:
FixupBWInstPass() : MachineFunctionPass(ID) {}
void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override {
AU.addRequired<MachineLoopInfo>(); // Machine loop info is used to
// guide some heuristics.
MachineFunctionPass::getAnalysisUsage(AU);
}
/// \brief Loop over all of the basic blocks,
/// replacing byte and word instructions by equivalent 32 bit instructions
/// where performance or code size can be improved.
bool runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) override;
private:
MachineFunction *MF;
/// Machine instruction info used throughout the class.
const X86InstrInfo *TII;
/// Local member for function's OptForSize attribute.
bool OptForSize;
/// Machine loop info used for guiding some heruistics.
MachineLoopInfo *MLI;
};
char FixupBWInstPass::ID = 0;
}
FunctionPass *llvm::createX86FixupBWInsts() { return new FixupBWInstPass(); }
bool FixupBWInstPass::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) {
if (!FixupBWInsts)
return false;
this->MF = &MF;
TII = MF.getSubtarget<X86Subtarget>().getInstrInfo();
OptForSize = MF.getFunction()->optForSize();
MLI = &getAnalysis<MachineLoopInfo>();
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Start X86FixupBWInsts\n";);
// Process all basic blocks.
for (auto &MBB : MF)
processBasicBlock(MF, MBB);
DEBUG(dbgs() << "End X86FixupBWInsts\n";);
return true;
}
// TODO: This method of analysis can miss some legal cases, because the
// super-register could be live into the address expression for a memory
// reference for the instruction, and still be killed/last used by the
// instruction. However, the existing query interfaces don't seem to
// easily allow that to be checked.
//
// What we'd really like to know is whether after OrigMI, the
// only portion of SuperDestReg that is alive is the portion that
// was the destination register of OrigMI.
bool FixupBWInstPass::getSuperRegDestIfDead(MachineInstr *OrigMI,
unsigned OrigDestSize,
unsigned &SuperDestReg) const {
unsigned OrigDestReg = OrigMI->getOperand(0).getReg();
SuperDestReg = getX86SubSuperRegister(OrigDestReg, 32);
// Make sure that the sub-register that this instruction has as its
// destination is the lowest order sub-register of the super-register.
// If it isn't, then the register isn't really dead even if the
// super-register is considered dead.
// This test works because getX86SubSuperRegister returns the low portion
// register by default when getting a sub-register, so if that doesn't
// match the original destination register, then the original destination
// register must not have been the low register portion of that size.
if (getX86SubSuperRegister(SuperDestReg, OrigDestSize) != OrigDestReg)
return false;
MachineBasicBlock::LivenessQueryResult LQR =
OrigMI->getParent()->computeRegisterLiveness(&TII->getRegisterInfo(),
SuperDestReg, OrigMI);
if (LQR != MachineBasicBlock::LQR_Dead)
return false;
if (OrigDestSize == 8) {
// In the case of byte registers, we also have to check that the upper
// byte register is also dead. That is considered to be independent of
// whether the super-register is dead.
unsigned UpperByteReg = getX86SubSuperRegister(SuperDestReg, 8, true);
LQR = OrigMI->getParent()->computeRegisterLiveness(&TII->getRegisterInfo(),
UpperByteReg, OrigMI);
if (LQR != MachineBasicBlock::LQR_Dead)
return false;
}
return true;
}
MachineInstr *FixupBWInstPass::tryReplaceLoad(unsigned New32BitOpcode,
unsigned OrigDestSize,
MachineInstr *MI) const {
unsigned NewDestReg;
// We are going to try to rewrite this load to a larger zero-extending
// load. This is safe if all portions of the 32 bit super-register
// of the original destination register, except for the original destination
// register are dead. getSuperRegDestIfDead checks that.
if (!getSuperRegDestIfDead(MI, OrigDestSize, NewDestReg))
return nullptr;
// Safe to change the instruction.
MachineInstrBuilder MIB =
BuildMI(*MF, MI->getDebugLoc(), TII->get(New32BitOpcode), NewDestReg);
unsigned NumArgs = MI->getNumOperands();
for (unsigned i = 1; i < NumArgs; ++i)
MIB.addOperand(MI->getOperand(i));
MIB->setMemRefs(MI->memoperands_begin(), MI->memoperands_end());
return MIB;
}
void FixupBWInstPass::processBasicBlock(MachineFunction &MF,
MachineBasicBlock &MBB) const {
// This algorithm doesn't delete the instructions it is replacing
// right away. By leaving the existing instructions in place, the
// register liveness information doesn't change, and this makes the
// analysis that goes on be better than if the replaced instructions
// were immediately removed.
//
// This algorithm always creates a replacement instruction
// and notes that and the original in a data structure, until the
// whole BB has been analyzed. This keeps the replacement instructions
// from making it seem as if the larger register might be live.
SmallVector<std::pair<MachineInstr *, MachineInstr *>, 8> MIReplacements;
for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator I = MBB.begin(); I != MBB.end(); ++I) {
MachineInstr *NewMI = nullptr;
MachineInstr *MI = I;
// See if this is an instruction of the type we are currently looking for.
switch (MI->getOpcode()) {
case X86::MOV8rm:
// Only replace 8 bit loads with the zero extending versions if
// in an inner most loop and not optimizing for size. This takes
// an extra byte to encode, and provides limited performance upside.
if (MachineLoop *ML = MLI->getLoopFor(&MBB)) {
if (ML->begin() == ML->end() && !OptForSize)
NewMI = tryReplaceLoad(X86::MOVZX32rm8, 8, MI);
}
break;
case X86::MOV16rm:
// Always try to replace 16 bit load with 32 bit zero extending.
// Code size is the same, and there is sometimes a perf advantage
// from eliminating a false dependence on the upper portion of
// the register.
NewMI = tryReplaceLoad(X86::MOVZX32rm16, 16, MI);
break;
default:
// nothing to do here.
break;
}
if (NewMI)
MIReplacements.push_back(std::make_pair(MI, NewMI));
}
while (!MIReplacements.empty()) {
MachineInstr *MI = MIReplacements.back().first;
MachineInstr *NewMI = MIReplacements.back().second;
MIReplacements.pop_back();
MBB.insert(MI, NewMI);
MBB.erase(MI);
}
}
|