| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Splitting basic blocks into multiple statements if there are now
additional scalar dependencies gives more freedom to the scheduler, but
more statements also means higher compile-time complexity. Switch to
finer statement granularity, the additional compile time should be
limited by the number of operations quota.
The regression tests are written for the -polly-stmt-granularity=bb
setting, therefore we add that flag to those tests that break with the
new default. Some of the tests only fail because the statements are
named differently due to a basic block resulting in multiple statements,
but which are removed during simplification of statements without
side-effects. Previous commits tried to reduce this effect, but it is
not completely avoidable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42151
llvm-svn: 324169
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Delinearization is now enabled by default and does not need to explicitly need
to be enabled in our tests.
llvm-svn: 264154
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These flags are now always passed to all tests and need to be disabled if
not needed. Disabling these flags, rather than passing them to almost all
tests, significantly simplfies our RUN: lines.
llvm-svn: 249422
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In order to compute domain conditions for conditionals we will now
traverse the region in the ScopInfo once and build the domains for
each block in the region. The SCoP statements can then use these
constraints when they build their domain.
The reason behind this change is twofold:
1) This removes a big chunk of preprocessing logic from the
TempScopInfo, namely the Conditionals we used to build there.
Additionally to moving this logic it is also simplified. Instead
of walking the dominance tree up for each basic block in the
region (as we did before), we now traverse the region only
once in order to collect the domain conditions.
2) This is the first step towards the isl based domain creation.
The second step will traverse the region similar to this step,
however it will propagate back edge conditions. Once both are in
place this conditional handling will allow multiple exit loops
additional logic.
Reviewers: grosser
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12428
llvm-svn: 246398
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I just learned that target triples prevent test cases to be run on other
architectures. Polly test cases are until now sufficiently target independent
to not require any target triples. Hence, we drop them.
llvm-svn: 235384
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 230784
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Scops that only read seem generally uninteresting and scops that only write are
most likely initializations where there is also little to optimize. To not
waste compile time we bail early.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7735
llvm-svn: 229820
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SCEV based code generation has been the default for two weeks after having
been tested for a long time. We now drop the support the non-scev-based code
generation.
llvm-svn: 222978
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As our delinearization works optimistically, we need in some cases run-time
checks that verify our optimistic assumptions. A simple example is the
following code:
void foo(long n, long m, long o, double A[n][m][o]) {
for (long i = 0; i < 100; i++)
for (long j = 0; j < 150; j++)
for (long k = 0; k < 200; k++)
A[i][j][k] = 1.0;
}
After clang linearized the access to A and we delinearized it again to
A[i][j][k] we need to ensure that we do not access the delinearized array
out of bounds (this information is not available in LLVM-IR). Hence, we
need to verify the following constraints at run-time:
CHECK: Assumed Context:
CHECK: [o, m] -> { : m >= 150 and o >= 200 }
llvm-svn: 212198
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We do this currently only for test cases where we have integer offsets that
clearly access array dimensions out-of-bound.
-; for (long i = 0; i < n; i++)
-; for (long j = 0; j < m; j++)
-; for (long k = 0; k < o; k++)
+; for (long i = 0; i < n - 3; i++)
+; for (long j = 4; j < m; j++)
+; for (long k = 0; k < o - 7; k++)
; A[i+3][j-4][k+7] = 1.0;
This will be helpful if we later want to simplify the access functions under the
assumption that they do not access memory out of bounds.
llvm-svn: 210179
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 205799
|
|
|
Contributed-by: Star Tan <tanmx_star@yeah.net>
llvm-svn: 187772
|
