| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These flags are now always passed to all tests and need to be disabled if
not needed. Disabling these flags, rather than passing them to almost all
tests, significantly simplfies our RUN: lines.
llvm-svn: 249422
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The "unprofitable" heuristic was broken and counted boxed loops
even though we do not represent and optimize them.
llvm-svn: 249274
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove redundant flags and duplicate invocations of the same test.
llvm-svn: 247285
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While we do not need to model PHI nodes in the region exit (as it is not part
of the SCoP), we need to prepare for the case that the exit block is split in
code generation to create a single exiting block. If this will happen, hence
if the region did not have a single exiting block before, we will model the
operands of the PHI nodes as escaping scalars in the SCoP.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12051
llvm-svn: 247078
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If a region does not have more than one loop, we do not identify it as
a Scop in ScopDetection. The main optimizations Polly is currently performing
(tiling, preparation for outer-loop vectorization and loop fusion) are unlikely
to have a positive impact on individual loops. In some cases, Polly's run-time
alias checks or conditional hoisting may still have a positive impact, but those
are mostly enabling transformations which LLVM already performs for individual
loops. As we do not focus on individual loops, we leave them untouched to not
introduce compile time regressions and execution time noise. This results in
good compile time reduction (oourafft: -73.99%, smg2000: -56.25%).
Contributed-by: Pratik Bhatu <cs12b1010@iith.ac.in>
Reviewers: grosser
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12268
llvm-svn: 246161
|
|
|
This will allow the ScopInfo to build the polyhedral representation for
non-affine regions that contain loops. Such loops are basically not visible
in the SCoP representation. Accesses that are variant in such loops are
therefor represented as non-affine accesses.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8153
llvm-svn: 234713
|
