| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Introduce analysis to check memref accesses (in MLFunctions) for out of bound
ones. It works as follows:
$ mlir-opt -memref-bound-check test/Transforms/memref-bound-check.mlir
/tmp/single.mlir:10:12: error: 'load' op memref out of upper bound access along dimension tensorflow/mlir#1
%x = load %A[%idxtensorflow/mlir#0, %idxtensorflow/mlir#1] : memref<9 x 9 x i32>
^
/tmp/single.mlir:10:12: error: 'load' op memref out of lower bound access along dimension tensorflow/mlir#1
%x = load %A[%idxtensorflow/mlir#0, %idxtensorflow/mlir#1] : memref<9 x 9 x i32>
^
/tmp/single.mlir:10:12: error: 'load' op memref out of upper bound access along dimension tensorflow/mlir#2
%x = load %A[%idxtensorflow/mlir#0, %idxtensorflow/mlir#1] : memref<9 x 9 x i32>
^
/tmp/single.mlir:10:12: error: 'load' op memref out of lower bound access along dimension tensorflow/mlir#2
%x = load %A[%idxtensorflow/mlir#0, %idxtensorflow/mlir#1] : memref<9 x 9 x i32>
^
/tmp/single.mlir:12:12: error: 'load' op memref out of upper bound access along dimension tensorflow/mlir#1
%y = load %B[%idy] : memref<128 x i32>
^
/tmp/single.mlir:12:12: error: 'load' op memref out of lower bound access along dimension tensorflow/mlir#1
%y = load %B[%idy] : memref<128 x i32>
^
#map0 = (d0, d1) -> (d0, d1)
#map1 = (d0, d1) -> (d0 * 128 - d1)
mlfunc @test() {
%0 = alloc() : memref<9x9xi32>
%1 = alloc() : memref<128xi32>
for %i0 = -1 to 9 {
for %i1 = -1 to 9 {
%2 = affine_apply #map0(%i0, %i1)
%3 = load %0[%2tensorflow/mlir#0, %2tensorflow/mlir#1] : memref<9x9xi32>
%4 = affine_apply #map1(%i0, %i1)
%5 = load %1[%4] : memref<128xi32>
}
}
return
}
- Improves productivity while manually / semi-automatically developing MLIR for
testing / prototyping; also provides an indirect way to catch errors in
transformations.
- This pass is an easy way to test the underlying affine analysis
machinery including low level routines.
Some code (in getMemoryRegion()) borrowed from @andydavis cl/218263256.
While on this:
- create mlir/Analysis/Passes.h; move Pass.h up from mlir/Transforms/ to mlir/
- fix a bug in AffineAnalysis.cpp::toAffineExpr
TODO: extend to non-constant loop bounds (straightforward). Will transparently
work for all accesses once floordiv, mod, ceildiv are supported in the
AffineMap -> FlatAffineConstraints conversion.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 219397961
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This is done by changing Type to be a POD interface around an underlying pointer storage and adding in-class support for isa/dyn_cast/cast.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 219372163
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This CL is a first in a series that implements early vectorization of
increasingly complex patterns. In particular, early vectorization will support
arbitrary loop nesting patterns (both perfectly and imperfectly nested), at
arbitrary depths in the loop tree.
This first CL builds the minimal support for applying 1-D patterns.
It relies on an unaligned load/store op abstraction that can be inplemented
differently on different HW.
Future CLs will support higher dimensional patterns, but 1-D patterns already
exhibit interesting properties.
In particular, we want to separate pattern matching (i.e. legality both
structural and dependency analysis based), from profitability analysis, from
application of the transformation.
As a consequence patterns may intersect and we need to verify that a pattern
can still apply by the time we get to applying it.
A non-greedy analysis on profitability that takes into account pattern
intersection is left for future work.
Additionally the CL makes the following cleanups:
1. the matches method now returns a value, not a reference;
2. added comments about the MLFunctionMatcher and MLFunctionMatches usage by
value;
3. added size and empty methods to matches;
4. added a negative vectorization test with a conditional, this exhibited a
but in the iterators. Iterators now return nullptr if the underlying storage
is nullpt.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 219299489
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
distinction. FunctionPasses can now choose to get called on all functions, or
have the driver split CFG/ML Functions up for them. NFC.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 218775885
|
|
|
This CL implements a very simple loop vectorization **test** and the basic
infrastructure to support it.
The test simply consists in:
1. matching the loops in the MLFunction and all the Load/Store operations
nested under the loop;
2. testing whether all the Load/Store are contiguous along the innermost
memory dimension along that particular loop. If any reference is
non-contiguous (i.e. the ForStmt SSAValue appears in the expression), then
the loop is not-vectorizable.
The simple test above can gradually be extended with more interesting
behaviors to account for the fact that a layout permutation may exist that
enables contiguity etc. All these will come in due time but it is worthwhile
noting that the test already supports detection of outer-vetorizable loops.
In implementing this test, I also added a recursive MLFunctionMatcher and some
sugar that can capture patterns
such as `auto gemmLike = Doall(Doall(Red(LoadStore())))` and allows iterating
on the matched IR structures. For now it just uses in order traversal but
post-order DFS will be useful in the future once IR rewrites start occuring.
One may note that the memory management design decision follows a different
pattern from MLIR. After evaluating different designs and how they quickly
increase cognitive overhead, I decided to opt for the simplest solution in my
view: a class-wide (threadsafe) RAII context.
This way, a pass that needs MLFunctionMatcher can just have its own locally
scoped BumpPtrAllocator and everything is cleaned up when the pass is destroyed.
If passes are expected to have a longer lifetime, then the contexts can easily
be scoped inside the runOnMLFunction call and storage lifetime reduced.
Lastly, whatever the scope of threading (module, function, pass), this is
expected to also be future-proof wrt concurrency (but this is a detail atm).
PiperOrigin-RevId: 217622889
|
