| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If a class's first data member is an instance of an empty class, then an
assertion in the PrettyClassLayoutGraphicalDumper would fail. The
storage is reserved, but it's not marked as in use.
As far as I understand, it's the assertion that's faulty, so I removed it
and updated the nearby comment.
Found by running llvm-pdbutil against its own PDB, and this assertion would
fail on HashAdjusters, which is a HashTable whose first data member is a
TraitsT, which is a PdbHashTraits<T>, which is an empty struct. (The struct
has a specialization for uint32_t, but that specialization doesn't apply
here because the T is actually ulittle32_t.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45645
llvm-svn: 330135
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Static data members were causing a problem because I mistakenly
assumed all members would affect a class's layout and so the
Layout member would be non-null.
llvm-svn: 305229
|
|
|
This is to reflect the evolving nature of the tool as being
useful for more than just dumping PDBs, as it can do many other
things.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34062
llvm-svn: 305106
|
