| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This change renames the Backend and BackendPrinter to Pipeline and PipelinePrinter respectively.
Variables and comments have also been updated to reflect this change.
The reason for this rename, is to be slightly more correct about what MCA is modeling. MCA models a Pipeline, which implies some logical sequence of stages.
Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon
Reviewed By: andreadb, courbet
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48496
llvm-svn: 335496
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Remove explicit stages and introduce a list of stages.
A pipeline should be composed of an arbitrary list of stages, and not any
predefined list of stages in the Backend. The Backend should not know of any
particular stage, rather it should only be concerned that it has a list of
stages, and that those stages will fulfill the contract of what it means to be
a Stage (namely pre/post/execute a given instruction).
For now, we leave the original set of stages defined in the Backend ctor;
however, I imagine these will be moved out at a later time.
This patch makes an adjustment to the semantics of Stage::isReady.
Specifically, what the Backend really needs to know is if a Stage has
unfinished work. With that said, it is more appropriately renamed
Stage::hasWorkToComplete(). This change will clean up the check in
Backend::run(), allowing us to query each stage to see if there is unfinished
work, regardless of what subclass a stage might be. I feel that this change
simplifies the semantics too, but that's a subjective statement.
Given how RetireStage and ExecuteStage handle data in their preExecute(), I've
had to change the order of Retire and Execute in our stage list. Retire must
complete any of its preExecute actions before ExecuteStage's preExecute can
take control. This is mainly because both stages utilize the RCU. In the
meantime, I want to see if I can adjust that or remove that coupling.
Reviewers: andreadb, RKSimon, courbet
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46907
llvm-svn: 335361
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: This patch transforms the Scheduler class into the ExecuteStage. Most of the logic remains.
Reviewers: andreadb, RKSimon, courbet
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47246
llvm-svn: 334679
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This class maintains the same logic as the original RetireControlUnit.
This is just an intermediate patch to make the RCU a Stage. Future patches will remove the dependency on the DispatchStage, and then more properly populate the pre/execute/post Stage interface.
Reviewers: andreadb, RKSimon, courbet
Reviewed By: andreadb, courbet
Subscribers: javed.absar, mgorny, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47244
llvm-svn: 333292
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The logic of dispatch remains the same, but now DispatchUnit is a Stage (DispatchStage).
This change has the benefit of simplifying the backend runCycle() code.
The same logic applies, but it belongs to different components now. This is just a start,
eventually we will need to remove the call to the DispatchStage in Scheduler.cpp, but
that will be a separate patch. This change is mostly a renaming and moving of existing logic.
This change also encouraged me to remove the Subtarget (STI) member from the
Backend class. That member was used to initialize the other members of Backend
and to eventually call DispatchUnit::dispatch(). Now that we have Stages, we
can eliminate this by instantiating the DispatchStage with everything it needs
at the time of construction (e.g., Subtarget). That change allows us to call
DispatchStage::execute(IR) as we expect to call execute() for all other stages.
Once we add the Stage list (D46907) we can more cleanly call preExecute() on
all of the stages, DispatchStage, will probably wrap cycleEvent() in that
case.
Made some formatting and minor cleanups to README.txt. Some of the text
was re-flowed to stay within 80 cols.
Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon
Reviewed By: andreadb, courbet
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46983
llvm-svn: 332652
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is just an idea, really two ideas. I expect some push-back,
but I realize that posting a diff is the most comprehensive way to express
these concepts.
This patch introduces a Stage class which represents the
various stages of an instruction pipeline. As a start, I have created a simple
FetchStage that is based on existing logic for how MCA produces
instructions, but now encapsulated in a Stage. The idea should become more concrete
once we introduce additional stages. The idea being, that when a stage completes,
the next stage in the pipeline will be executed. Stages are chained together
as a singly linked list to closely model a real pipeline. For now there is only one stage,
so the stage-to-stage flow of instructions isn't immediately obvious.
Eventually, Stage will also handle event notifications, but that functionality
is not complete, and not destined for this patch. Ideally, an interested party
can register for notifications from a particular stage. Callbacks will be issued to
these listeners at various points in the execution of the stage.
For now, eventing functionality remains similar to what it has been in mca::Backend.
We will be building-up the Stage class as we move on, such as adding debug output.
This patch also removes the unique_ptr<Instruction> return value from
InstrBuilder::createInstruction. An Instruction pointer is still produced,
but now it's up to the caller to decide how that item should be managed post-allocation
(e.g., smart pointer). This allows the Fetch stage to create instructions and
manage the lifetime of those instructions as it wishes, and not have to be bound to any
specific managed pointer type. Other callers of createInstruction might have different
requirements, and thus can manage the pointer to fit their needs. Another idea would be to push the
ownership to the RCU.
Currently, the FetchStage will wrap the Instruction
pointer in a shared_ptr. This allows us to remove the Instruction container in
Backend, which was probably going to disappear, or move, at some point anyways.
Note that I did run these changes through valgrind, to make sure we are not leaking
memory. While the shared_ptr comes with some additional overhead it relieves us
from having to manage a list of generated instructions, and/or make lookup calls
to remove the instructions.
I realize that both the Stage class and the Instruction pointer management
(mentioned directly above) are separate but related ideas, and probably should
land as separate patches; I am happy to do that if either idea is decent.
The main reason these two ideas are together is that
Stage::execute() can mutate an InstRef. For the fetch stage, the InstRef is populated
as the primary action of that stage (execute()). I didn't want to change the Stage interface
to support the idea of generating an instruction. Ideally, instructions are to
be pushed through the pipeline. I didn't want to draw too much of a
specialization just for the fetch stage. Excuse the word-salad.
Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny, javed.absar, tschuett, gbedwell
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46741
llvm-svn: 332390
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch eliminates many places where we originally needed to pass index
values to represent an instruction. The index is still used as a key, in various parts of
MCA. I'm not comfortable eliminating the index just yet. By burying the index in
the instruction, we can avoid exposing that value in many places.
Eventually, we should consider removing the Instructions list in the Backend
all together, it's only used to hold and reclaim the memory for the allocated
Instruction instances. Instead we could pass around a smart pointer. But that's
a separate discussion/patch.
Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46367
llvm-svn: 331660
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290
llvm-svn: 331272
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds the ability to describe properties of the hardware retire
control unit.
Tablegen class RetireControlUnit has been added for this purpose (see
TargetSchedule.td).
A RetireControlUnit specifies the size of the reorder buffer, as well as the
maximum number of opcodes that can be retired every cycle.
A zero (or negative) value for the reorder buffer size means: "the size is
unknown". If the size is unknown, then llvm-mca defaults it to the value of
field SchedMachineModel::MicroOpBufferSize. A zero or negative number of
opcodes retired per cycle means: "there is no restriction on the number of
instructions that can be retired every cycle".
Models can optionally specify an instance of RetireControlUnit. There can only
be up-to one RetireControlUnit definition per scheduling model.
Information related to the RCU (RetireControlUnit) is stored in (two new fields
of) MCExtraProcessorInfo. llvm-mca loads that information when it initializes
the DispatchUnit / RetireControlUnit (see Dispatch.h/Dispatch.cpp).
This patch fixes PR36661.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45259
llvm-svn: 329304
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is done in preparation for D45259.
With D45259, models can specify the size of the reorder buffer, and the retire
throughput directly via tablegen.
llvm-svn: 329274
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
scheduling model for llvm-mca
This patch allows the description of register files in processor scheduling
models. This addresses PR36662.
A new tablegen class named 'RegisterFile' has been added to TargetSchedule.td.
Targets can optionally describe register files for their processors using that
class. In particular, class RegisterFile allows to specify:
- The total number of physical registers.
- Which target registers are accessible through the register file.
- The cost of allocating a register at register renaming stage.
Example (from this patch - see file X86/X86ScheduleBtVer2.td)
def FpuPRF : RegisterFile<72, [VR64, VR128, VR256], [1, 1, 2]>
Here, FpuPRF describes a register file for MMX/XMM/YMM registers. On Jaguar
(btver2), a YMM register definition consumes 2 physical registers, while MMX/XMM
register definitions only cost 1 physical register.
The syntax allows to specify an empty set of register classes. An empty set of
register classes means: this register file models all the registers specified by
the Target. For each register class, users can specify an optional register
cost. By default, register costs default to 1. A value of 0 for the number of
physical registers means: "this register file has an unbounded number of
physical registers".
This patch is structured in two parts.
* Part 1 - MC/Tablegen *
A first part adds the tablegen definition of RegisterFile, and teaches the
SubtargetEmitter how to emit information related to register files.
Information about register files is accessible through an instance of
MCExtraProcessorInfo.
The idea behind this design is to logically partition the processor description
which is only used by external tools (like llvm-mca) from the processor
information used by the llvm machine schedulers.
I think that this design would make easier for targets to get rid of the extra
processor information if they don't want it.
* Part 2 - llvm-mca related *
The second part of this patch is related to changes to llvm-mca.
The main differences are:
1) class RegisterFile now needs to take into account the "cost of a register"
when allocating physical registers at register renaming stage.
2) Point 1. triggered a minor refactoring which lef to the removal of the
"maximum 32 register files" restriction.
3) The BackendStatistics view has been updated so that we can print out extra
details related to each register file implemented by the processor.
The effect of point 3. is also visible in tests register-files-[1..5].s.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44980
llvm-svn: 329067
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is done in preparation for the fix for PR36784.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 328306
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BackendStatistics view.
With this patch, the "instruction dispatched" event now provides information
related to the number of microarchitectural registers used in each register
file. Similarly, the "instruction retired" event is now able to tell how may
registers are freed in each register file.
Currently, the BackendStatistics view is the only consumer of register
usage/pressure information. BackendStatistics uses that info to print out a few
general statistics (i.e. max number of mappings used; total mapping created).
Before this patch, the BackendStatistics was forced to query the Backend to
obtain the register pressure information.
This helps removes that dependency. Now views are completely independent from
the Backend. As a consequence, it should be easier to address PR36663 and
further modularize the pipeline.
Added a couple of test cases in the BtVer2 specific directory.
llvm-svn: 328129
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BackendStatistics view.
This patch introduces two new callbacks in the event listener interface to
handle the "buffered resource reserved" event and the "buffered resource
released" event. Every time a buffered resource is used, an event is generated.
Before this patch, the Scheduler (with the help of the ResourceManager) was
responsible for tracking the scheduler's queue usage. However, that design
forced the Scheduler to 'publish' scheduler's queue pressure information through
the Backend interface.
The goal of this patch is to break the dependency between the BackendStatistics
view, and the Backend. Now the Scheduler knows how to notify "buffer
reserved/released" events. The scheduler's queue usage analysis has been moved
to the BackendStatistics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44686
llvm-svn: 328011
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
own file.
Function computeProcResourceMasks is used by the ResourceManager (owned by the
Scheduler) to compute resource masks for processor resources. Before this
refactoring, there was an implicit dependency between the Scheduler and the
InstrBuilder. That is because InstrBuilder has to know about resource masks when
computing the set of processor resources consumed by a new instruction.
With this patch, the functionality that computes resource masks has been
extracted from the ResourceManager, and moved to a separate file (Support.h).
This helps removing the dependency between the Scheduler and the InstrBuilder.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 327973
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch introduces a new class named HWStallEvent (see HWEventListener.h),
and updates the event listener interface. A HWStallEvent represents a pipeline
stall caused by the lack of hardware resources. Similarly to HWInstructionEvent,
the event type is an unsigned, and the exact meaning depends on the subtarget.
At the moment, HWStallEvent supports a few generic dispatch events.
The main goals of this patch is to remove the logic that counts dispatch stalls
from the DispatchUnit to the BackendStatistics view.
Previously, DispatchUnit was responsible for counting and classifying dispatch
stall events. With this patch, we delegate the task of counting and classifying
stall events to the listeners (i.e. in our case, it is view
"BackendStatistics"). So, the DispatchUnit doesn't have to do extra
(unnecessary) bookkeeping.
This patch also helps futher simplifying the Backend interface. Now class
BackendStatistics no longer has to query the Backend interface to obtain the
number of dispatch stalls. As a consequence, we can get rid of all the
'getNumXXX()' methods from class Backend.
The long term goal is to remove all the remaining dependencies between the
Backend and the BackendStatistics interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44621
llvm-svn: 327837
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 327756
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 327749
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
make the SummaryView independent from the Backend. NFCI
Since r327420, the tool can query the MCSchedModel interface to obtain the
reciprocal throughput information.
As a consequence, method `ResourceManager::getRThroughput`, and
method `Backend::getRThroughput` are no longer needed.
This patch simplifies the code by removing the custom RThroughput computation.
This patch also refactors class SummaryView by removing the dependency with
the Backend object.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 327425
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 327394
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: This is a first step towards making the pipeline configurable.
Subscribers: llvm-commits, andreadb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44309
llvm-svn: 327389
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change removes method Backend::getProcResourceMasks() and simplifies some
logic in the Views. This effectively removes yet another dependency between the
views and the Backend.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 327214
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This should appease the buildbots.
llvm-svn: 327025
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows the customization of the performance report.
Users can specify their own custom sequence of views.
Each view contributes a portion of the performance report generated by the
BackendPrinter.
Internally, class BackendPrinter keeps a sequence of views; views are printed
out in sequence when method 'printReport()' is called.
This patch addresses one of the two review comments from Clement in D43951.
llvm-svn: 327018
|
|
|
llvm-mca is an LLVM based performance analysis tool that can be used to
statically measure the performance of code, and to help triage potential
problems with target scheduling models.
llvm-mca uses information which is already available in LLVM (e.g. scheduling
models) to statically measure the performance of machine code in a specific cpu.
Performance is measured in terms of throughput as well as processor resource
consumption. The tool currently works for processors with an out-of-order
backend, for which there is a scheduling model available in LLVM.
The main goal of this tool is not just to predict the performance of the code
when run on the target, but also help with diagnosing potential performance
issues.
Given an assembly code sequence, llvm-mca estimates the IPC (instructions per
cycle), as well as hardware resources pressure. The analysis and reporting style
were mostly inspired by the IACA tool from Intel.
This patch is related to the RFC on llvm-dev visible at this link:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-March/121490.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43951
llvm-svn: 326998
|
