| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Second patch: in the lib.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: nemanjai, tschuett, MaskRay, mgrang, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68692
llvm-svn: 374158
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The diff looks scary but it really isn't:
1. I moved the check for the number of measurements into `SchedClassClusterCentroid::validate()`
2. While there, added a check that we can only have a single inverse throughput measurement. I missed that when adding it initially.
3. In `Analysis::SchedClassCluster::measurementsMatch()` is called with the current LLVM values from schedule class and the values from Centroid.
3.1. The values from centroid we can already get from `SchedClassClusterCentroid::getAsPoint()`.
This isn't 100% a NFC, because previously for inverse throughput we used `min()`. I have asked whether i have done that correctly in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D57647?id=184939#inline-510384 but did not hear back. I think `avg()` should be used too, thus it is a fix.
3.2. Finally, refactor the computation of the LLVM-specified values into `Analysis::SchedClassCluster::getSchedClassPoint()`
I will need that function for [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41275 | PR41275 ]]
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59951
llvm-svn: 357245
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is an alternative to D59539.
Let's suppose we have measured 4 different opcodes, and got: `0.5`, `1.0`, `1.5`, `2.0`.
Let's suppose we are using `-analysis-clustering-epsilon=0.5`.
By default now we will start processing the `0.5` point, find that `1.0` is it's neighbor, add them to a new cluster.
Then we will notice that `1.5` is a neighbor of `1.0` and add it to that same cluster.
Then we will notice that `2.0` is a neighbor of `1.5` and add it to that same cluster.
So all these points ended up in the same cluster.
This may or may not be a correct implementation of dbscan clustering algorithm.
But this is rather horribly broken for the reasons of comparing the clusters with the LLVM sched data.
Let's suppose all those opcodes are currently in the same sched cluster.
If i specify `-analysis-inconsistency-epsilon=0.5`, then no matter
the LLVM values this cluster will **never** match the LLVM values,
and thus this cluster will **always** be displayed as inconsistent.
The solution is obviously to split off some of these opcodes into different sched cluster.
But how do i do that? Out of 4 opcodes displayed in the inconsistency report,
which ones are the "bad ones"? Which ones are the most different from the checked-in data?
I'd need to go in to the `.yaml` and look it up manually.
The trivial solution is to, when creating clusters, don't use the full dbscan algorithm,
but instead "pick some unclustered point, pick all unclustered points that are it's neighbor,
put them all into a new cluster, repeat". And just so as it happens, we can arrive
at that algorithm by not performing the "add neighbors of a neighbor to the cluster" step.
But that won't work well once we teach analyze mode to operate in on-1D mode
(i.e. on more than a single measurement type at a time), because the clustering would
depend on the order of the measurements.
Instead, let's just create a single cluster per opcode, and put all the points of that opcode into said cluster.
And simultaneously check that every point in that cluster is a neighbor of every other point in the cluster,
and if they are not, the cluster (==opcode) is unstable.
This is //yet another// step to bring me closer to being able to continue cleanup of bdver2 sched model..
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40880 | PR40880 ]].
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, jdoerfert, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59820
llvm-svn: 357152
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This eps param is used for two distinct things:
* initial point clusterization
* checking clusters against the llvm values
What if one wants to only look at highly different clusters, without changing
the clustering itself? In particular, this helps to weed out noisy measurements
(since the clusterization epsilon is still small, so there is a better chance
that noisy measurements from the same opcode will go into different clusters)
By splitting it into two params it is now possible.
This is nearly-free performance-wise:
Old:
```
$ perf stat -r 25 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency-1.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 10099 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-old.html'
...
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency-1.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html' (25 runs):
390.01 msec task-clock # 0.998 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.25% )
12 context-switches # 31.735 M/sec ( +- 27.38% )
0 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec
4745 page-faults # 12183.732 M/sec ( +- 0.54% )
1562711900 cycles # 4012303.327 GHz ( +- 0.24% ) (82.90%)
185567822 stalled-cycles-frontend # 11.87% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.52% ) (83.30%)
392106234 stalled-cycles-backend # 25.09% backend cycles idle ( +- 1.31% ) (33.79%)
1839236666 instructions # 1.18 insn per cycle
# 0.21 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.15% ) (50.37%)
407035764 branches # 1045074878.710 M/sec ( +- 0.12% ) (66.80%)
10896459 branch-misses # 2.68% of all branches ( +- 0.17% ) (83.20%)
0.390629 +- 0.000972 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.25% )
```
```
$ perf stat -r 9 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency.yml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 50572 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-old.html'
...
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency.yml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html' (9 runs):
6803.36 msec task-clock # 0.999 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.96% )
262 context-switches # 38.546 M/sec ( +- 23.06% )
0 cpu-migrations # 0.065 M/sec ( +- 76.03% )
13287 page-faults # 1953.206 M/sec ( +- 0.32% )
27252537904 cycles # 4006024.257 GHz ( +- 0.95% ) (83.31%)
1496314935 stalled-cycles-frontend # 5.49% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.97% ) (83.32%)
16128404524 stalled-cycles-backend # 59.18% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.30% ) (33.37%)
17611143370 instructions # 0.65 insn per cycle
# 0.92 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.05% ) (50.04%)
3894906599 branches # 572537147.437 M/sec ( +- 0.03% ) (66.69%)
116314514 branch-misses # 2.99% of all branches ( +- 0.20% ) (83.35%)
6.8118 +- 0.0689 seconds time elapsed ( +- 1.01%)
```
New:
```
$ perf stat -r 25 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency-1.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new.html
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 10099 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new.html'
...
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency-1.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new.html' (25 runs):
400.14 msec task-clock # 0.998 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.66% )
12 context-switches # 29.429 M/sec ( +- 25.95% )
0 cpu-migrations # 0.100 M/sec ( +-100.00% )
4714 page-faults # 11796.496 M/sec ( +- 0.55% )
1603131306 cycles # 4011840.105 GHz ( +- 0.66% ) (82.85%)
199538509 stalled-cycles-frontend # 12.45% frontend cycles idle ( +- 2.40% ) (83.10%)
402249109 stalled-cycles-backend # 25.09% backend cycles idle ( +- 1.19% ) (34.05%)
1847783963 instructions # 1.15 insn per cycle
# 0.22 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.18% ) (50.64%)
407162722 branches # 1018925730.631 M/sec ( +- 0.12% ) (67.02%)
10932779 branch-misses # 2.69% of all branches ( +- 0.51% ) (83.28%)
0.40077 +- 0.00267 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.67% )
lebedevri@pini-pini:/build/llvm-build-Clang-release$ perf stat -r 9 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency.yml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new.html
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 50572 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new.html'
...
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency.yml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new.html' (9 runs):
6947.79 msec task-clock # 1.000 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.90% )
217 context-switches # 31.236 M/sec ( +- 36.16% )
1 cpu-migrations # 0.096 M/sec ( +- 50.00% )
13258 page-faults # 1908.389 M/sec ( +- 0.34% )
27830796523 cycles # 4006032.286 GHz ( +- 0.89% ) (83.30%)
1504554006 stalled-cycles-frontend # 5.41% frontend cycles idle ( +- 2.10% ) (83.32%)
16716574843 stalled-cycles-backend # 60.07% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.65% ) (33.38%)
17755545931 instructions # 0.64 insn per cycle
# 0.94 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.09% ) (50.04%)
3897255686 branches # 560980426.597 M/sec ( +- 0.06% ) (66.70%)
117045395 branch-misses # 3.00% of all branches ( +- 0.47% ) (83.34%)
6.9507 +- 0.0627 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.90% )
```
I.e. it's +2.6% slowdown for one whole sweep, or +2% for 5 whole sweeps.
Within noise i'd say.
Should help with [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40787 | PR40787 ]].
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58476
llvm-svn: 354767
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Given an instruction `Opcode`, we can make benchmarks (measurements) of the
instruction characteristics/performance. Then, to facilitate further analysis
we group the benchmarks with *similar* characteristics into clusters.
Now, this is all not entirely deterministic. Some instructions have variable
characteristics, depending on their arguments. And thus, if we do several
benchmarks of the same instruction `Opcode`, we may end up with *different*
performance characteristics measurements. And when we then do clustering,
these several benchmarks of the same instruction `Opcode` may end up being
clustered into *different* clusters. This is not great for further analysis.
We shall find every `Opcode` with benchmarks not in just one cluster, and move
*all* the benchmarks of said `Opcode` into one new unstable cluster per `Opcode`.
I have solved this by making `ClusterId` a bit field, adding a `IsUnstable` bit,
and introducing `-analysis-display-unstable-clusters` switch to toggle between
displaying stable-only clusters and unstable-only clusters.
The reclusterization is deterministically stable, produces identical reports
between runs. (Or at least that is what i'm seeing, maybe it isn't)
Timings/comparisons:
old (current trunk/head) {F8303582}
```
$ perf stat -r 25 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 43970 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-old.html'
...
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 43970 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-old.html'
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html' (25 runs):
6624.73 msec task-clock # 0.999 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.53% )
172 context-switches # 25.965 M/sec ( +- 29.89% )
0 cpu-migrations # 0.042 M/sec ( +- 56.54% )
31073 page-faults # 4690.754 M/sec ( +- 0.08% )
26538711696 cycles # 4006230.292 GHz ( +- 0.53% ) (83.31%)
2017496807 stalled-cycles-frontend # 7.60% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.93% ) (83.32%)
13403650062 stalled-cycles-backend # 50.51% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.33% ) (33.37%)
19770706799 instructions # 0.74 insn per cycle
# 0.68 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.04% ) (50.04%)
4419821812 branches # 667207369.714 M/sec ( +- 0.03% ) (66.69%)
121741669 branch-misses # 2.75% of all branches ( +- 0.28% ) (83.34%)
6.6283 +- 0.0358 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.54% )
```
patch, with reclustering but without filtering (i.e. outputting all the stable *and* unstable clusters) {F8303586}
```
$ perf stat -r 25 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new-all.html
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 43970 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new-all.html'
...
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 43970 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new-all.html'
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new-all.html' (25 runs):
6475.29 msec task-clock # 0.999 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.31% )
213 context-switches # 32.952 M/sec ( +- 23.81% )
1 cpu-migrations # 0.130 M/sec ( +- 43.84% )
31287 page-faults # 4832.057 M/sec ( +- 0.08% )
25939086577 cycles # 4006160.279 GHz ( +- 0.31% ) (83.31%)
1958812858 stalled-cycles-frontend # 7.55% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.68% ) (83.32%)
13218961512 stalled-cycles-backend # 50.96% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.29% ) (33.37%)
19752995402 instructions # 0.76 insn per cycle
# 0.67 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.04% ) (50.04%)
4417079244 branches # 682195472.305 M/sec ( +- 0.03% ) (66.70%)
121510065 branch-misses # 2.75% of all branches ( +- 0.19% ) (83.34%)
6.4832 +- 0.0229 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.35% )
```
Funnily, *this* measurement shows that said reclustering actually improved performance.
patch, with reclustering, only the stable clusters {F8303594}
```
$ perf stat -r 25 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new-stable.html
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 43970 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new-stable.html'
...
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 43970 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new-stable.html'
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new-stable.html' (25 runs):
6387.71 msec task-clock # 0.999 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.13% )
133 context-switches # 20.792 M/sec ( +- 23.39% )
0 cpu-migrations # 0.063 M/sec ( +- 61.24% )
31318 page-faults # 4903.256 M/sec ( +- 0.08% )
25591984967 cycles # 4006786.266 GHz ( +- 0.13% ) (83.31%)
1881234904 stalled-cycles-frontend # 7.35% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.25% ) (83.33%)
13209749965 stalled-cycles-backend # 51.62% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.16% ) (33.36%)
19767554347 instructions # 0.77 insn per cycle
# 0.67 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.04% ) (50.03%)
4417480305 branches # 691618858.046 M/sec ( +- 0.03% ) (66.68%)
118676358 branch-misses # 2.69% of all branches ( +- 0.07% ) (83.33%)
6.3954 +- 0.0118 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.18% )
```
Performance improved even further?! Makes sense i guess, less clusters to print.
patch, with reclustering, only the unstable clusters {F8303601}
```
$ perf stat -r 25 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new-unstable.html -analysis-display-unstable-clusters
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 43970 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new-unstable.html'
...
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 43970 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new-unstable.html'
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new-unstable.html -analysis-display-unstable-clusters' (25 runs):
6124.96 msec task-clock # 1.000 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.20% )
194 context-switches # 31.709 M/sec ( +- 20.46% )
0 cpu-migrations # 0.039 M/sec ( +- 49.77% )
31413 page-faults # 5129.261 M/sec ( +- 0.06% )
24536794267 cycles # 4006425.858 GHz ( +- 0.19% ) (83.31%)
1676085087 stalled-cycles-frontend # 6.83% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.46% ) (83.32%)
13035595603 stalled-cycles-backend # 53.13% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.16% ) (33.36%)
18260877653 instructions # 0.74 insn per cycle
# 0.71 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.05% ) (50.03%)
4112411983 branches # 671484364.603 M/sec ( +- 0.03% ) (66.68%)
114066929 branch-misses # 2.77% of all branches ( +- 0.11% ) (83.32%)
6.1278 +- 0.0121 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.20% )
```
This tells us that the actual `-analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=` outputting only takes ~0.4 sec for 43970 benchmark points (3 whole sweeps)
(Also, wow this is fast, it used to take several minutes originally)
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40715 | PR40715 ]].
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, jdoerfert, llvm-commits, RKSimon
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58355
llvm-svn: 354441
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
InstructionBenchmarkClustering::rangeQuery(): reserve for the upper bound of Neighbors
Summary:
As it was pointed out in D54388+D54390, the maximal size of `Neighbors` is known,
it will contain at most Points_.size() minus one (the center of the cluster)
While that is the upper bound, meaning in the most cases, the actual count
will be much smaller, since D54390 made the allocation persistent,
we no longer have to worry about overly-optimistically `reserve()`ing.
Old: (D54393)
```
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=100000 -benchmarks-file=/tmp/benchmarks.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters.html' (16 runs):
6553.167456 task-clock (msec) # 1.000 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.21% )
...
6.5547 +- 0.0134 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.20% )
```
New:
```
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=100000 -benchmarks-file=/tmp/benchmarks.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters.html' (16 runs):
6315.057872 task-clock (msec) # 0.999 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.24% )
...
6.3187 +- 0.0160 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.25% )
```
And that is another -~4%.
Since this is the last (as of this moment) patch in this patch series,
it is a good time to summarize:
Old: (svn trunk, as stated in D54381)
```
$ time ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=100000 -benchmarks-file=/tmp/benchmarks.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters.html &> /dev/null
real 0m24.884s
user 0m24.099s
sys 0m0.785s
```
So these patches, on a given benchmark,
has decreased llvm-exegesis analysis time by 74.62%.
There surely is more room for further improvements.
D54514 may improve thins by -11.5% more (relative to this patch).
Parallelization may improve things further significantly, too.
Reviewers: courbet, MaskRay, RKSimon, gchatelet, john.brawn
Reviewed By: courbet, MaskRay
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54415
llvm-svn: 347204
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Old: (D54390)
```
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=100000 -benchmarks-file=/tmp/benchmarks.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters.html' (10 runs):
7432.421721 task-clock (msec) # 1.000 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.15% )
...
7.4336 +- 0.0115 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.15% )
```
New:
```
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=100000 -benchmarks-file=/tmp/benchmarks.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters.html' (10 runs):
6569.936144 task-clock (msec) # 1.000 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.22% )
...
6.5711 +- 0.0143 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.22% )
```
And another -12%. You'd think it would be `inline`d anyway, but no! :)
Reviewers: courbet, MaskRay, RKSimon, gchatelet, john.brawn
Reviewed By: courbet, MaskRay
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54393
llvm-svn: 347203
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm::SmallVectorImpl& output parameter
Summary:
I do believe this is the correct fix.
We call `rangeQuery()` *very* often. And many times it's output vector is large (tens of thousands entries), so small-size-opt won't help.
Old: (D54389)
```
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=100000 -benchmarks-file=/tmp/benchmarks.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters.html' (10 runs):
7934.528363 task-clock (msec) # 1.000 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.19% )
...
7.9354 +- 0.0148 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.19% )
```
New:
```
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=100000 -benchmarks-file=/tmp/benchmarks.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters.html' (10 runs):
7383.793440 task-clock (msec) # 1.000 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.47% )
...
7.3868 +- 0.0340 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.46% )
```
And another -7%. And that isn't even the good bit yet.
Old:
* calls to allocation functions: 2081419
* temporary allocations: 219658 (10.55%)
* bytes allocated in total (ignoring deallocations): 4.31 GB
New:
* calls to allocation functions: 1880295 (-10%)
* temporary allocations: 18758 (1%) (-91% *sic*)
* bytes allocated in total (ignoring deallocations): 545.15 MB (-88% *sic*)
Reviewers: courbet, MaskRay, RKSimon, gchatelet, john.brawn
Reviewed By: courbet, MaskRay
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54390
llvm-svn: 347202
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm::SmallVector<size_t, 0> for storage.
Summary:
Old: (D54383)
```
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=100000 -benchmarks-file=/tmp/benchmarks.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters.html' (10 runs):
9098.781978 task-clock (msec) # 1.000 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.16% )
...
9.1015 +- 0.0148 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.16% )
```
New:
```
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=100000 -benchmarks-file=/tmp/benchmarks.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters.html' (10 runs):
8553.352480 task-clock (msec) # 1.000 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.12% )
...
8.5539 +- 0.0105 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.12% )
```
So another -6%.
That is because the `SmallVector` **doubles** it size when reallocating, which is great here,
since we can't `reserve()` since we can't know how many `Neighbors` we will have.
Reviewers: courbet, MaskRay, RKSimon, gchatelet, john.brawn
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54388
llvm-svn: 347200
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This allows simplifying references of llvm::foo with foo when the needs
come in the future.
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: gchatelet
Subscribers: javed.absar, tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53455
llvm-svn: 344922
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
measured data.
Summary:
We now highlight any sched classes whose measurements do not match the
LLVM SchedModel. "bad" clusters are marked in red.
Screenshot in phabricator diff.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, mgrang, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47639
llvm-svn: 333884
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: This makes the report much more readable.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, mgrang, craig.topper, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47189
llvm-svn: 332979
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The analysis mode gives the user a clustered view of the measurement results.
Next steps are (requires the split ok AsmTemplate.Name into {mnemonic, mode}):
- Show the sched class.
- Highlight any inconsistencies with the checked-in data.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits, tschuett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46865
llvm-svn: 332344
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 332231
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The analysis mode gives the user a clustered view of the measurement results and
highlights any inconsistencies with the checked-in data.
llvm-svn: 332229
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Add missing move.
llvm-svn: 331624
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Breaks build over llvm::Error copy construction.
llvm-svn: 331623
|
|
|
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: mgorny, tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46432
llvm-svn: 331622
|
