| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
vector splat constants
We could try harder to handle non-splat vector constants too,
but that seems much rarer to me.
Note that the div test isn't resolved because there's a check
for isIntegerTy() guarding that transform.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20497
llvm-svn: 270369
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20513
llvm-svn: 270357
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
index 0 patterns. This gives them higher priority than the memory patterns. This matches AVX1/2.
llvm-svn: 270355
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
checks appear just once.
llvm-svn: 270345
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
inversions could appear in a row.
llvm-svn: 270344
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20459
llvm-svn: 270336
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 270334
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20438
llvm-svn: 270322
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20324
llvm-svn: 270321
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Main problem here was that SHF_COMPRESSED has the same value with
XCORE_SHF_CP_SECTION, which was included as standart (common) flag.
As far I understand xCore is a family of controllers and it that
means it's constant should be processed separately,
only if e_machine == EM_XCORE, otherwise llvm-readobj would output
different constants twice for compressed section:
Flags [
..
SHF_COMPRESSED (0x800)
..
XCORE_SHF_CP_SECTION (0x800)
..
]
what probably does not make sence if you're not working with xcore file.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20273
llvm-svn: 270320
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
AVX2 versions of vector extract when AVX512VL is enabled.
llvm-svn: 270318
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
AVX512VL is enabled. Also add shuffle comment printing for AVX512VL VPERMPD/VPERMQ to keep some tests that now use these instructions instead of the AVX2 ones.
llvm-svn: 270317
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
is enabled.
llvm-svn: 270316
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
the instruction encodings and ensure everything is with EVEX.
llvm-svn: 270315
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
lifetime.end
A cleanuppad is not cheap, they turn into many instructions and result
in additional spills and fills. It is not worth keeping a cleanuppad
around if all it does is hold a lifetime.end instruction.
N.B. We first try to merge the cleanuppad with another cleanuppad to
avoid dropping the lifetime and debug info markers.
llvm-svn: 270314
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 270313
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Allocating larger register classes first should give better allocation
results (and more importantly for myself, make the lit tests more stable
with respect to scheduler changes).
Patch by Matthias Braun
llvm-svn: 270312
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These are kind of a mess and hard to follow, particularly
for loads and stores. Fix various redundant, unnecessary
and dead settings.
llvm-svn: 270307
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I had used `std::remove_if` under the assumption that it moves the
predicate matching elements to the end, but actaully the elements
remaining towards the end (after the iterator returned by
`std::remove_if`) are indeterminate. Fix the bug (and make the code
more straightforward) by using a temporary SmallVector, and add a test
case demonstrating the issue.
llvm-svn: 270306
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is essentially doing a 24-bit signed division with FP.
We need to truncate to the N bit result.
llvm-svn: 270305
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The current SGPR spilling test does not stress this
because it is using s_buffer_load instructions to
increase SGPR pressure and spill, but their output
operands have the same SReg_32_XM0 constraint. This fixes
an error when the SReg_32 output from most instructions
is spilled.
llvm-svn: 270301
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 270297
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 270296
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Original patch by Tom Stellard
llvm-svn: 270295
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This saves a small amount of code size, and is a first small step toward
passing values on the stack across block boundaries.
Differential Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20450
llvm-svn: 270294
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This should not be making assumptions on the value of
the casted pointer.
llvm-svn: 270293
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We now use LiveRangeCalc::extendToUses() instead of a specially designed
algorithm in constructMainRangeFromSubranges():
- The original motivation for constructMainRangeFromSubranges() were
differences between the main liverange and subranges because of hidden
dead definitions. This case however cannot happen anymore with the
DetectDeadLaneMasks pass in place.
- It simplifies the code.
- This fixes a longstanding bug where we did not properly create new SSA
values on merging control flow (the MachineVerifier missed most of
these cases).
- Move constructMainRangeFromSubranges() to LiveIntervalAnalysis and
LiveRangeCalc to better match the implementation/available helper
functions.
This re-applies r269016. The fixes from r270290 and r270259 should avoid
the machine verifier problems this time.
llvm-svn: 270291
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is fine for subregister ranges to be undefined on some CFG paths as
we may have a "vregX:other_subreg<read-undef> =" def on that path. We
do not (and should not) have live segments for the subregister ranges.
The MachineVerifier should not complain about this.
This is a slight variant of http://llvm.org/PR27705
llvm-svn: 270290
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20311
llvm-svn: 270287
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 270285
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 270284
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Change reloc to PIC_;
* Cleanup (clang-format & modify test);
llvm-svn: 270282
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 270271
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In addition to clarifying the warning message this contains a minor functional
change in that it now warns if the *immediate* parent directory in which the
missing PCM is expected to be isn't found.
This patch also includes a more comprehensive testcase.
rdar://problem/25860711
llvm-svn: 270269
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 270265
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DBI stream contains a stream number of the symbol record stream.
Symbol record streams is an array of length-type-value members.
Each member represents one symbol.
Publics stream contains offsets to the symbol record stream.
This patch is to print out all symbols that are referenced by
the publics stream.
Note that even with this patch, llvm-pdbdump cannot dump all the
information in a publics stream since it contains more information
than symbol names. I'll improve it in followup patches.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20480
llvm-svn: 270262
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix renameDisconnectedComponents() creating vreg uses that can be
reached from function begin withouthaving a definition (or explicit
live-in). Fix this by inserting IMPLICIT_DEF instruction before
control-flow joins as necessary.
Removes an assert from MachineScheduler because we may now get
additional IMPLICIT_DEF when preparing the scheduling policy.
This fixes the underlying problem of http://llvm.org/PR27705
llvm-svn: 270259
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
As this optimization converts two loads into one load with two shift instructions,
it could potentially hurt performance if a loop is arithmetic operation intensive.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, mcrosier, jmolloy
Subscribers: evandro, jmolloy, aemerson, rengolin, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20172
llvm-svn: 270251
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Check that the incoming blocks of phi nodes are identical, and block
function merging if they are not.
rdar://problem/26255167
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20462
llvm-svn: 270250
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The uuid_command was duplicating the load_command.cmdsize field. This removes the duplicate from the YAML mapping and from the test cases.
llvm-svn: 270248
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adds support for handling unknown load commands, and a bogus_load_command tests.
Unknown or unsupported load commands can be specified in YAML by their hex value.
llvm-svn: 270239
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch is a first step towards a more extendible method of matching combined target shuffle masks.
Initially this just pulls out the existing basic mask matches and adds support for some 256/512 bit equivalents. Future patterns will require a number of features to be added but I wanted to keep this patch simple.
I hope we can avoid duplication between shuffle lowering and combining and share more complex pattern match functions in future commits.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19198
llvm-svn: 270230
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 270229
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was noted in PR24766:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24766#c2
We may not know whether the sign bit(s) are zero or one, but we can still
optimize based on knowing that the sign bit is repeated.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20275
llvm-svn: 270222
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I accidentally exposed a bug in MCExpr::evaluateAsRelocatableImpl() with the test file added in:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL269977
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20434
llvm-svn: 270218
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 270217
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This refactors the logic in X86 to avoid code duplication. It also
splits it in two steps: it first decides if a symbol is local to the DSO
and then uses that information to decide how to access it.
The first part is implemented by shouldAssumeDSOLocal. It is not in any
way specific to X86. In a followup patch I intend to move it to
somewhere common and reused it in other backends.
llvm-svn: 270209
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We now handle them just like non hidden ones. This was already the case
on x86 (r207518) and arm (r207517).
llvm-svn: 270205
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
for an inline function.
If an inline function is observed but unused in a translation unit, dummy
coverage mapping data with zero hash is stored for this function.
If such a coverage mapping section came earlier than real one, the latter
was ignored. As a result, llvm-cov was unable to show coverage information
for those functions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20286
llvm-svn: 270194
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Note: This is specifically to allow GCC's test pr44707 to pass.
Trivial change, not put for differential revision. Test included.
llvm-svn: 270192
|