| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
arguments where on is %st.
All of these instructions consume one encoded register and the other register is %st. They either write the result to %st or the encoded register. Previously we printed both arguments when the encoded register was written. And we printed one argument when the result was written to %st. For the stack popping forms the encoded register is always the destination and we didn't print both operands. This was inconsistent with gcc and objdump and just makes the output assembly code harder to read.
This patch changes things to always print both operands making us consistent with gcc and objdump. The parser should still be able to handle the single register forms just as it did before. This also matches the GNU assembler behavior.
llvm-svn: 353061
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
printing it as %st(0) when its encoded in the instruction.
This is a step back from the change I made in r352985. This appears to be more consistent with gcc and objdump behavior.
llvm-svn: 353015
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
as the clobber name to make MS inline asm work correctly"
Looking into gcc and objdump behavior more this was overly aggressive. If the register is encoded in the instruction we should print %st(0), if its implicit we should print %st.
I'll be making a more directed change in a future patch.
llvm-svn: 353013
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
name to make MS inline asm work correctly
Summary:
When calculating clobbers for MS style inline assembly we fail if the asm clobbers stack top because we print st(0) and try to pass it through the gcc register name check. This was found with when I attempted to make a emms/femms clobber all ST registers. If you use emms/femms in MS inline asm we would try to use st(0) as the clobber name but clang would think that wasn't a valid clobber name.
This also matches what objdump disassembly prints. It's also what is printed by gcc -S.
Reviewers: RKSimon, rnk, efriedma, spatel, andreadb, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: eraman, gbedwell, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57621
llvm-svn: 352985
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
in the Instruction Info View. NFC
This makes easier to identify changes in the instruction info flags. It also
helps spotting potential regressions similar to the one recently introduced at
r336728.
Using the same character to mark MayLoad/MayStore/HasSideEffects is problematic
for llvm-lit. When pattern matching substrings, llvm-lit consumes tabs and
spaces. A change in position of the flag marker may not trigger a test failure.
This patch only changes the character used for flag `hasSideEffects`. The reason
why I didn't touch other flags is because I want to avoid spamming the mailing
because of the massive diff due to the numerous tests affected by this change.
In future, each instruction flag should be associated with a different character
in the Instruction Info View.
llvm-svn: 336797
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a fix for the problem arising in D47374 (PR37678):
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37678
We may not have throughput info because it's not specified in the model
or it's not available with variant scheduling, so assume that those
instructions can execute/complete at max-issue-width.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47723
llvm-svn: 334055
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
It's super irritating.
[properly configured] git client then complains about that double-newline,
and you have to use `--force` to ignore the warning, since even if you
fix it manually, it will be reintroduced the very next runtime :/
Reviewers: RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, craig.topper, javed.absar, gbedwell
Reviewed By: gbedwell
Subscribers: javed.absar, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47697
llvm-svn: 333887
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
{FLDL2E, FLDL2T, FLDLG2, FLDLN2, FLDPI} were using WriteMicrocoded.
- I've measured the values for Broadwell, Haswell, SandyBridge, Skylake.
- For ZnVer1 and Atom, values were transferred form InstRWs.
- For SLM and BtVer2, I've guessed some values :(
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, andreadb
Subscribers: gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47585
llvm-svn: 333656
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
- I've measured the values for Broadwell, Haswell, SandyBridge, Skylake.
- For ZnVer1 and Atom, values were transferred form `InstRW`s.
- For SLM and BtVer2, values are from Agner.
This is split off from https://reviews.llvm.org/D47377
Reviewers: RKSimon, andreadb
Subscribers: gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47523
llvm-svn: 333642
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 332447
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and YMM/ZMM instructions.
This removes all InstrRW overrides for these instructions - some x87 overrides remain but most use default (and realistic) values.
llvm-svn: 331643
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
WriteFRcp/WriteFRsqrt are split to support scalar, XMM and YMM/ZMM instructions.
WriteFSqrt is split into single/double/long-double sizes and scalar, XMM, YMM and ZMM instructions.
This removes all InstrRW overrides for these instructions.
NOTE: There were a couple of typos in the Znver1 model - notably a 1cy throughput for SQRT that is highly unlikely and doesn't tally with Agner.
NOTE: I had to add Agner's numbers for several targets for WriteFSqrt80.
llvm-svn: 331629
|
|
|
llvm-svn: 330499
|
