| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Files which don't contain any functions are likely useless; don't
include them in the main table. Put the links at the bottom of the
page, in case someone wants to figure out coverage for code inside
a macro.
Not sure if this is the best solution, but it seems like an
improvement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36298
llvm-svn: 310518
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PR30735 reports an issue where llvm-cov hangs with a worker thread
waiting on a condition, and the main thread waiting to join() the
workers. While this doesn't appear to be a bug in llvm-cov or the
ThreadPool implementation, it would be helpful to disable the use of
threading in the llvm-cov tests where no test coverage is added.
More context: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30735
llvm-svn: 307610
|
|
|
This commit makes llvm-cov avoid showing 0% (0/0) coverage for things
like file function coverage, etc. in reports and HTML output. This can happen
for files like headers that have macros but no functions. This commit makes
llvm-cov report - (0/0) instead.
rdar://29246480
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26615
llvm-svn: 287539
|
