| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch by Michael LeMay
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D25340
llvm-svn: 284139
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a fix for PR27844.
When replacing uses of unsafe allocas, emit the new location
immediately after each use. Without this, the pointer stays live from
the function entry to the last use, while it's usually cheaper to
recalculate.
llvm-svn: 272969
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds an option, -safe-stack-no-tls, for using normal
storage instead of thread-local storage for the unsafe stack pointer.
This can be useful when SafeStack is applied to an operating system
kernel.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15673
Patch by Michael LeMay.
llvm-svn: 256221
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The current code does not take alloca array size into account and,
as a result, considers any access past the first array element to be
unsafe.
llvm-svn: 254350
|
|
|
This patch adds the safe stack instrumentation pass to LLVM, which separates
the program stack into a safe stack, which stores return addresses, register
spills, and local variables that are statically verified to be accessed
in a safe way, and the unsafe stack, which stores everything else. Such
separation makes it much harder for an attacker to corrupt objects on the
safe stack, including function pointers stored in spilled registers and
return addresses. You can find more information about the safe stack, as
well as other parts of or control-flow hijack protection technique in our
OSDI paper on code-pointer integrity (http://dslab.epfl.ch/pubs/cpi.pdf)
and our project website (http://levee.epfl.ch).
The overhead of our implementation of the safe stack is very close to zero
(0.01% on the Phoronix benchmarks). This is lower than the overhead of
stack cookies, which are supported by LLVM and are commonly used today,
yet the security guarantees of the safe stack are strictly stronger than
stack cookies. In some cases, the safe stack improves performance due to
better cache locality.
Our current implementation of the safe stack is stable and robust, we
used it to recompile multiple projects on Linux including Chromium, and
we also recompiled the entire FreeBSD user-space system and more than 100
packages. We ran unit tests on the FreeBSD system and many of the packages
and observed no errors caused by the safe stack. The safe stack is also fully
binary compatible with non-instrumented code and can be applied to parts of
a program selectively.
This patch is our implementation of the safe stack on top of LLVM. The
patches make the following changes:
- Add the safestack function attribute, similar to the ssp, sspstrong and
sspreq attributes.
- Add the SafeStack instrumentation pass that applies the safe stack to all
functions that have the safestack attribute. This pass moves all unsafe local
variables to the unsafe stack with a separate stack pointer, whereas all
safe variables remain on the regular stack that is managed by LLVM as usual.
- Invoke the pass as the last stage before code generation (at the same time
the existing cookie-based stack protector pass is invoked).
- Add unit tests for the safe stack.
Original patch by Volodymyr Kuznetsov and others at the Dependable Systems
Lab at EPFL; updates and upstreaming by myself.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6094
llvm-svn: 239761
|
