summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/float-induction-x86.ll
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""Eric Christopher2019-04-171-0/+149
| | | | | | | | The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory. Will be re-reverting again. llvm-svn: 358552
* Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."Eric Christopher2019-04-171-149/+0
| | | | | | | | As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton). This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda. llvm-svn: 358546
* [SimplifyCFG] use pass options and remove the latesimplifycfg passSanjay Patel2017-10-281-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is no-functional-change-intended. This is repackaging the functionality of D30333 (defer switch-to-lookup-tables) and D35411 (defer folding unconditional branches) with pass parameters rather than a named "latesimplifycfg" pass. Now that we have individual options to control the functionality, we could decouple when these fire (but that's an independent patch if desired). The next planned step would be to add another option bit to disable the sinking transform mentioned in D38566. This should also make it clear that the new pass manager needs to be updated to limit simplifycfg in the same way as the old pass manager. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38631 llvm-svn: 316835
* [SimplifyCFG] Defer folding unconditional branches to LateSimplifyCFG if it ↵Balaram Makam2017-07-191-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | can destroy canonical loop structure. Summary: When simplifying unconditional branches from empty blocks, we pre-test if the BB belongs to a set of loop headers and keep the block to prevent passes from destroying canonical loop structure. However, the current algorithm fails if the destination of the branch is a loop header. Especially when such a loop's latch block is folded into loop header it results in additional backedges and LoopSimplify turns it into a nested loop which prevent later optimizations from being applied (e.g., loop unrolling and loop interleaving). This patch augments the existing algorithm by further checking if the destination of the branch belongs to a set of loop headers and defer eliminating it if yes to LateSimplifyCFG. Fixes PR33605: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33605 Reviewers: efriedma, mcrosier, pacxx, hsung, davidxl Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: ashutosh.nema, gberry, javed.absar, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35411 llvm-svn: 308422
* [LV] Test once if vector trip count is zero, instead of twiceAyal Zaks2017-07-191-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Generate a single test to decide if there are enough iterations to jump to the vectorized loop, or else go to the scalar remainder loop. This test compares the Scalar Trip Count: if STC < VF * UF go to the scalar loop. If requiresScalarEpilogue() holds, at-least one iteration must remain scalar; the rest can be used to form vector iterations. So in this case the test checks instead if (STC - 1) < VF * UF by comparing STC <= VF * UF, and going to the scalar loop if so. Otherwise the vector loop is entered for at-least one vector iteration. This test covers the case where incrementing the backedge-taken count will overflow leading to an incorrect trip count of zero. In this (rare) case we will also avoid the vector loop and jump to the scalar loop. This patch simplifies the existing tests and effectively removes the basic-block originally named "min.iters.checked", leaving the single test in block "vector.ph". Original observation and initial patch by Evgeny Stupachenko. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34150 llvm-svn: 308421
* [LV] Handle external uses of floating-point induction variablesMatthew Simpson2017-04-261-0/+63
| | | | | | | Reference: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32758 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32445 llvm-svn: 301428
* [Loop Vectorizer] Handling loops FP induction variables.Elena Demikhovsky2016-07-241-0/+86
Allowed loop vectorization with secondary FP IVs. Like this: float *A; float x = init; for (int i=0; i < N; ++i) { A[i] = x; x -= fp_inc; } The auto-vectorization is possible when the induction binary operator is "fast" or the function has "unsafe" attribute. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21330 llvm-svn: 276554
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud