summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/test/Transforms/InstSimplify/undef.ll
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""Eric Christopher2019-04-171-0/+362
| | | | | | | | The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory. Will be re-reverting again. llvm-svn: 358552
* Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."Eric Christopher2019-04-171-362/+0
| | | | | | | | As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton). This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda. llvm-svn: 358546
* [InstCombine] replace divide-by-constant checks with asserts; NFCSanjay Patel2016-08-301-1/+16
| | | | | | | These folds already have tests for scalar and vector types, except for the vector div-by-0 case, so I'm adding tests for that. llvm-svn: 280115
* [InstSimplify] regenerate checks using a scriptSanjay Patel2016-03-251-86/+131
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | I didn't notice any significant changes in the actual checks here; all of these tests already used FileCheck, so a script can batch update them in one shot. This commit is just to show the value of automating this process: We have uniform formatting as opposed to a mish-mash of check structure that changes based on individual prefs and the current fashion. This makes it simpler to update when we find a bug or make an enhancement. llvm-svn: 264457
* IR: Make the X / undef -> undef fold match the commentJustin Bogner2016-02-251-0/+21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The constant folding for sdiv and udiv has a big discrepancy between the comments and the code, which looks like a typo. Currently, we're folding X / undef pretty inconsistently: 0 / undef -> undef C / undef -> 0 undef / undef -> 0 Whereas the comments state we do X / undef -> undef. The logic that returns zero is actually commented as doing undef / X -> 0, despite that the LHS isn't undef in many of the cases that hit it. llvm-svn: 261813
* [InstSimplify] Teach InstSimplify how to simplify extractelementDavid Majnemer2015-07-131-0/+14
| | | | llvm-svn: 242008
* [opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to ↵David Blaikie2015-04-161-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | the call instruction See r230786 and r230794 for similar changes to gep and load respectively. Call is a bit different because it often doesn't have a single explicit type - usually the type is deduced from the arguments, and just the return type is explicit. In those cases there's no need to change the IR. When that's not the case, the IR usually contains the pointer type of the first operand - but since typed pointers are going away, that representation is insufficient so I'm just stripping the "pointerness" of the explicit type away. This does make the IR a bit weird - it /sort of/ reads like the type of the first operand: "call void () %x(" but %x is actually of type "void ()*" and will eventually be just of type "ptr". But this seems not too bad and I don't think it would benefit from repeating the type ("void (), void () * %x(" and then eventually "void (), ptr %x(") as has been done with gep and load. This also has a side benefit: since the explicit type is no longer a pointer, there's no ambiguity between an explicit type and a function that returns a function pointer. Previously this case needed an explicit type (eg: a function returning a void() function was written as "call void () () * @x(" rather than "call void () * @x(" because of the ambiguity between a function returning a pointer to a void() function and a function returning void). No ambiguity means even function pointer return types can just be written alone, without writing the whole function's type. This leaves /only/ the varargs case where the explicit type is required. Given the special type syntax in call instructions, the regex-fu used for migration was a bit more involved in its own unique way (as every one of these is) so here it is. Use it in conjunction with the apply.sh script and associated find/xargs commands I've provided in rr230786 to migrate your out of tree tests. Do let me know if any of this doesn't cover your cases & we can iterate on a more general script/regexes to help others with out of tree tests. About 9 test cases couldn't be automatically migrated - half of those were functions returning function pointers, where I just had to manually delete the function argument types now that we didn't need an explicit function type there. The other half were typedefs of function types used in calls - just had to manually drop the * from those. import fileinput import sys import re pat = re.compile(r'((?:=|:|^|\s)call\s(?:[^@]*?))(\s*$|\s*(?:(?:\[\[[a-zA-Z0-9_]+\]\]|[@%](?:(")?[\\\?@a-zA-Z0-9_.]*?(?(3)"|)|{{.*}}))(?:\(|$)|undef|inttoptr|bitcast|null|asm).*$)') addrspace_end = re.compile(r"addrspace\(\d+\)\s*\*$") func_end = re.compile("(?:void.*|\)\s*)\*$") def conv(match, line): if not match or re.search(addrspace_end, match.group(1)) or not re.search(func_end, match.group(1)): return line return line[:match.start()] + match.group(1)[:match.group(1).rfind('*')].rstrip() + match.group(2) + line[match.end():] for line in sys.stdin: sys.stdout.write(conv(re.search(pat, line), line)) llvm-svn: 235145
* ConstantFold: Shifting undef by zero results in undefDavid Majnemer2014-12-181-0/+21
| | | | llvm-svn: 224553
* InstSimplify: shl nsw/nuw undef, %V -> undefDavid Majnemer2014-12-171-0/+28
| | | | | | | | | | We can always choose an value for undef which might cause %V to shift out an important bit except for one case, when %V is zero. However, shl behaves like an identity function when the right hand side is zero. llvm-svn: 224405
* InstSimplify: Remove usesless %a parameter from testsDavid Majnemer2014-12-111-4/+4
| | | | | | No functional change intended. llvm-svn: 224016
* ConstantFold: an undef shift amount results in undefDavid Majnemer2014-12-101-0/+21
| | | | | | | X shifted by undef results in undef because the undef value can represent values greater than the width of the operands. llvm-svn: 223968
* ConstantFold: div undef, 0 should fold to undef, not zeroDavid Majnemer2014-12-101-0/+7
| | | | | | Dividing by zero yields an undefined value. llvm-svn: 223924
* InstSimplify: [al]shr exact undef, %X -> undefDavid Majnemer2014-12-101-0/+14
| | | | | | | Exact shifts always keep the non-zero bits of their input. This means it keeps it's undef bits. llvm-svn: 223923
* InstSimplify: div %X, 0 -> undefDavid Majnemer2014-12-101-0/+14
| | | | | | We already optimized rem %X, 0 to undef, we should do the same for div. llvm-svn: 223919
* InstSimplify: Make shift, select and GEP simplifications vector-aware.Benjamin Kramer2014-01-241-0/+7
| | | | llvm-svn: 200016
* Add tests for existing InstSimplify features.Dan Gohman2011-11-041-0/+21
| | | | llvm-svn: 143721
* Teach instsimplify to simplify calls to undef.Dan Gohman2011-11-041-0/+7
| | | | llvm-svn: 143719
* Improve constant folding of undef for cmp and select operators.Dan Gohman2011-07-011-0/+127
llvm-svn: 134223
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud