bcm5719-llvm - Project Ortega BCM5719 LLVM

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""	Eric Christopher	2019-04-17	1	-0/+275
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory. Will be re-reverting again. llvm-svn: 358552
*	Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."	Eric Christopher	2019-04-17	1	-275/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton). This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda. llvm-svn: 358546
*	[InstCombine] eliminate commuted select-shuffles + binop (PR41304)	Sanjay Patel	2019-04-01	1	-20/+51
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	If we have a commutable vector binop with inverted select-shuffles, we don't care about the order of the operands in each vector lane: LHS = shuffle V1, V2, <0, 5, 6, 3> RHS = shuffle V2, V1, <0, 5, 6, 3> LHS + RHS --> <V1[0]+V2[0], V2[1]+V1[1], V2[2]+V1[2], V1[3]+V2[3]> --> V1 + V2 PR41304: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41304 ...is currently titled as an SLP enhancement, but at least for the given example, we can reduce that in instcombine because we are just eliminating shuffles. As noted in the TODO, this could be generalized, but I haven't thought through those patterns completely, so this is limited to what appears to be always safe. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60048 llvm-svn: 357382
*	[InstCombine] add tests for inverted select-shuffles + binop (PR41304); NFC	Sanjay Patel	2019-03-31	1	-0/+244
	llvm-svn: 357368