| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: efriedma, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: ychen, rsmith, joerg, aaron.ballman, lebedev.ri, uenoku, jdoerfert, hfinkel, javed.absar, spatel, dmgreen, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53342
llvm-svn: 372091
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Back-end currently expands mempcpy, but middle-end should work with memcpy instead of mempcpy to enable more memcpy-optimization.
GCC backend emits mempcpy, so LLVM backend could form it too, if we know mempcpy libcall is better than memcpy + n.
https://godbolt.org/z/dOCG96
Reviewers: efriedma, spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: hjl.tools, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65737
llvm-svn: 370593
|
