| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently every time we encounter an indirect call of a known function,
we try to evaluate the inline cost of that function. In case of a
recursion, that evaluation never stops.
The solution I propose is to evaluate only the indirect call of the
function, while any further indirect calls (of a known function) will be
treated just as direct function calls, which, actually, never tries to
evaluate the call.
Fixes PR35469.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69349
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 854e956219e78cb8d7ef3b021d7be6b5d6b6af04.
It broke tests:
Transforms/Inline/redundant-loads.ll
Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-callee-update.ll
|
|
|
Currently every time we encounter an indirect call of a known function,
we try to evaluate the inline cost of that function. In case of a
recursion, that evaluation never stops.
The solution presented is to evaluate only the indirect call of the
function, while any further indirect calls (of a known function) will be
treated just as direct function calls, which, actually, never tries to
evaluate the call.
Fixes PR35469.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69349
|
