| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.
Will be re-reverting again.
llvm-svn: 358552
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around
labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label
name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the
address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM
IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly.
We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format
of DILabel is
!DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3)
We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the
code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label
metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block.
The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out.
The format of the intrinsic is
llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1)
It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The
intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the
label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter.
We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend.
Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use
insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331841
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently each Function points to a DISubprogram and DISubprogram has a
scope field. For member functions the scope is a DICompositeType. DIScopes
point to the DICompileUnit to facilitate type uniquing.
Distinct DISubprograms (with isDefinition: true) are not part of the type
hierarchy and cannot be uniqued. This change removes the subprograms
list from DICompileUnit and instead adds a pointer to the owning compile
unit to distinct DISubprograms. This would make it easy for ThinLTO to
strip unneeded DISubprograms and their transitively referenced debug info.
Motivation
----------
Materializing DISubprograms is currently the most expensive operation when
doing a ThinLTO build of clang.
We want the DISubprogram to be stored in a separate Bitcode block (or the
same block as the function body) so we can avoid having to expensively
deserialize all DISubprograms together with the global metadata. If a
function has been inlined into another subprogram we need to store a
reference the block containing the inlined subprogram.
Attached to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27284 is a python script
that updates LLVM IR testcases to the new format.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19034
<rdar://problem/25256815>
llvm-svn: 266446
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 265081
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I originally reapplied this in 257550, but had to revert again due to bot
breakage. The only change in this version is to allow either the TypeSize
or the TypeAllocSize of the variable to be the one represented in debug info
(hopefully in the future we can figure out how to encode the difference).
Additionally, several bot failures following r257550, were due to
optimizer bugs now fixed in r257787 and r257795.
r257550 commit message was:
```
The follow extra changes were made to test cases:
Manually making the variable be the actual type instead of a pointer
to avoid pointer-size differences in generic code:
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-03-24-MemberFn.ll
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-04-06-NestedFnDbgInfo.ll
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-05-03-DisableFramePtr.ll
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/varargs.ll
Delete sizing information from debug info for the same reason
(but the presence of the pointer was important to the test case):
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/restrict.ll
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/tu-composite.ll
LLVM :: Linker/type-unique-type-array-a.ll
LLVM :: Linker/type-unique-simple2.ll
Fixing an incorrect DW_OP_deref
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-05-03-OriginDIE.ll
Fixing a missing DW_OP_deref
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/incorrect-variable-debugloc.ll
Additionally, clang should no longer complain during bootstrap should no
longer happen after r257534.
The original commit message was:
``
Summary:
Teach the Verifier to make sure that the storage size given to llvm.dbg.declare
or the value size given to llvm.dbg.value agree with what is declared in
DebugInfo. This is implicitly assumed in a number of passes (e.g. in SROA).
Additionally this catches a number of common mistakes, such as passing a
pointer when a value was intended or vice versa.
One complication comes from stack coloring which modifies the original IR when
it merges allocas in order to make sure that if AA falls back to the IR it gets
the correct result. However, given this new invariant, indiscriminately
replacing one alloca by a different (differently sized one) is no longer valid.
Fix this by just undefing out any use of the alloca in a dbg.declare in this
case.
Additionally, I had to fix a number of test cases. Of particular note:
- I regenerated dbg-changes-codegen-branch-folding.ll from the given source as
it was affected by the bug fixed in r256077
- two-cus-from-same-file.ll was changed to avoid having a variable-typed debug
variable as that would depend on the target, even though this test is
supposed to be generic
- I had to manually declared size/align for reference type. See also the
discussion for D14275/r253186.
- fpstack-debuginstr-kill.ll required changing `double` to `long double`
- most others were just a question of adding OP_deref
``
```
llvm-svn: 257850
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While I investigate some new buildbot failures. This was originally reapplied
as r257550 and r257558.
llvm-svn: 257563
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The follow extra changes were made to test cases:
Manually making the variable be the actual type instead of a pointer
to avoid pointer-size differences in generic code:
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-03-24-MemberFn.ll
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-04-06-NestedFnDbgInfo.ll
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-05-03-DisableFramePtr.ll
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/varargs.ll
Delete sizing information from debug info for the same reason
(but the presence of the pointer was important to the test case):
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/restrict.ll
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/tu-composite.ll
LLVM :: Linker/type-unique-type-array-a.ll
LLVM :: Linker/type-unique-simple2.ll
Fixing an incorrect DW_OP_deref
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-05-03-OriginDIE.ll
Fixing a missing DW_OP_deref
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/incorrect-variable-debugloc.ll
Additionally, clang should no longer complain during bootstrap should no
longer happen after r257534.
The original commit message was:
```
Summary:
Teach the Verifier to make sure that the storage size given to llvm.dbg.declare
or the value size given to llvm.dbg.value agree with what is declared in
DebugInfo. This is implicitly assumed in a number of passes (e.g. in SROA).
Additionally this catches a number of common mistakes, such as passing a
pointer when a value was intended or vice versa.
One complication comes from stack coloring which modifies the original IR when
it merges allocas in order to make sure that if AA falls back to the IR it gets
the correct result. However, given this new invariant, indiscriminately
replacing one alloca by a different (differently sized one) is no longer valid.
Fix this by just undefing out any use of the alloca in a dbg.declare in this
case.
Additionally, I had to fix a number of test cases. Of particular note:
- I regenerated dbg-changes-codegen-branch-folding.ll from the given source as
it was affected by the bug fixed in r256077
- two-cus-from-same-file.ll was changed to avoid having a variable-typed debug
variable as that would depend on the target, even though this test is
supposed to be generic
- I had to manually declared size/align for reference type. See also the
discussion for D14275/r253186.
- fpstack-debuginstr-kill.ll required changing `double` to `long double`
- most others were just a question of adding OP_deref
```
llvm-svn: 257550
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Looks like there's a case where clang generates debug info that triggers
the new verifier check. Reverting while investigating.
llvm-svn: 257107
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Teach the Verifier to make sure that the storage size given to llvm.dbg.declare
or the value size given to llvm.dbg.value agree with what is declared in
DebugInfo. This is implicitly assumed in a number of passes (e.g. in SROA).
Additionally this catches a number of common mistakes, such as passing a
pointer when a value was intended or vice versa.
One complication comes from stack coloring which modifies the original IR when
it merges allocas in order to make sure that if AA falls back to the IR it gets
the correct result. However, given this new invariant, indiscriminately
replacing one alloca by a different (differently sized one) is no longer valid.
Fix this by just undefing out any use of the alloca in a dbg.declare in this
case.
Additionally, I had to fix a number of test cases. Of particular note:
- I regenerated dbg-changes-codegen-branch-folding.ll from the given source as
it was affected by the bug fixed in r256077
- two-cus-from-same-file.ll was changed to avoid having a variable-typed debug
variable as that would depend on the target, even though this test is
supposed to be generic
- I had to manually declared size/align for reference type. See also the
discussion for D14275/r253186.
- fpstack-debuginstr-kill.ll required changing `double` to `long double`
- most others were just a question of adding OP_deref
Reviewers: aprantl
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14276
llvm-svn: 257105
|
|
|
It is X86 specific and will not be properly exercised unless LLVM is
built with the X86 target.
llvm-svn: 255426
|
