| Commit message (Expand) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | allow this testcase to pass with recent changes. The test hasn't been | Chris Lattner | 2009-10-12 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| * | This test only works on ppc32 if some optimization is done before | Dale Johannesen | 2009-06-23 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| * | This is now passing. | Evan Cheng | 2009-01-16 | 1 | -1/+0 |
| * | Mark this XFAIL for the moment. | Duncan Sands | 2009-01-13 | 1 | -0/+1 |
| * | Second test is only valid in 32-bit mode. | Evan Cheng | 2009-01-12 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| * | Test for r62076. | Evan Cheng | 2009-01-12 | 1 | -0/+1 |
| * | this doesn't depend on the gcc early inliner anymore. | Chris Lattner | 2009-01-09 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| * | PR3290 is now fixed. | Chris Lattner | 2009-01-09 | 1 | -5/+1 |
| * | XFAIL test caused by r61493. Apparently, this is expected? | Bill Wendling | 2008-12-31 | 1 | -0/+4 |
| * | For PR1338: Rename test dirs | Anton Korobeynikov | 2008-05-29 | 1 | -0/+88 |

