| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The "join" method in LiveDebugValues does not attempt to join unseen
predecessor blocks if their out-locations aren't yet initialized, instead
the block should be re-visited later to see if any locations have changed
validity. However, because the set of blocks were all being "process"'d
once before "join" saw them, that logic in "join" was actually ignoring
legitimate out-locations on the first pass through. This meant that some
invalidated locations were not removed from the head of loops, allowing
illegal locations to persist.
Fix this by removing the run of "process" before the main join/process loop
in ExtendRanges. Now the unseen predecessors that "join" skips truly are
uninitialized, and we come back to the block at a later time to re-run
"join", see the @baz function added.
This also fixes another fault where stack/register transfers in the entry
block (or any other before-any-loop-block) had their tranfers initially
ignored, and were then never revisited. The MIR test added tests for this
behaviour.
XFail a test that exposes another bug; a fix for this is coming in D66895.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66663
llvm-svn: 370328
|
|
|
LiveDebugValues gives variable locations to blocks, but it should also take
away. There are various circumstances where a variable location is known
until a loop backedge with a different location is detected. In those
circumstances, where there's no agreement on the variable location, it
should be undef / removed, otherwise we end up picking a location that's
valid on some loop iterations but not others.
However, LiveDebugValues doesn't currently do this, see the new testcase
attached. Without this patch, the location of !3 is assumed to be %bar
through the loop. Once it's added to the In-Locations list, it's never
removed, even though the later dbg.value(0... of !3 makes the location
un-knowable.
This patch checks during block-location-joining to see whether any
previously-present locations have been removed in a predecessor. If they
have, the live-ins have changed, and the block needs reprocessing.
Similarly, in transferTerminator, assign rather than |= the Out-Locations
after processing a block, as we may have deleted some previously valid
locations. This will mean that LiveDebugValues performs more propagation
-- but that's necessary for it being correct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66599
llvm-svn: 369778
|
