| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This adds a visitLocationList function to the DWARF v4 location lists,
similar to what already exists for DWARF v5. It follows the approach
outlined in previous patches (D69672), where the parsed form is always
stored in the DWARF v5 format, which makes it easier for generic code to
be built on top of that. v4 location lists are "upgraded" during
parsing, and then this upgrade is undone while dumping.
Both "inline" and section-based dumping is rewritten to reuse the
existing "generic" location list dumper. This means that the output
format is consistent for all location lists (the only thing one needs to
implement is the function which prints the "raw" form of a location
list), and that debug_loc dumping correctly processes base address
selection entries, etc.
The previous existing debug_loc functionality (e.g.,
parseOneLocationList) is rewritten on top of the new API, but it is not
removed as there is still code which uses them. This will be done in
follow-up patches, after I build the API to access the "interpreted"
location lists in a generic way (as that is what those users really
want).
Reviewers: dblaikie, probinson, JDevlieghere, aprantl, SouraVX
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69847
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The functions different in two ways:
- getLLVMRegNum could return both "eh" and "other" dwarf register
numbers, while getLLVMRegNumFromEH only returned the "eh" number.
- getLLVMRegNum asserted if the register was not found, while the second
function returned -1.
The second distinction was pretty important, but it was very hard to
infer that from the function name. Aditionally, for the use case of
dumping dwarf expressions, we needed a function which can work with both
kinds of number, but does not assert.
This patch solves both of these issues by merging the two functions into
one, returning an Optional<unsigned> value. While the same thing could
be achieved by adding an "IsEH" argument to the (renamed)
getLLVMRegNumFromEH function, it seemed better to avoid the confusion of
two functions and put the choice of asserting into the hands of the
caller -- if he checks the Optional value, he can safely process
"untrusted" input, and if he blindly dereferences the Optional, he gets
the assertion.
I've updated all call sites to the new API, choosing between the two
options according to the function they were calling originally, except
that I've updated the usage in DWARFExpression.cpp to use the "safe"
method instead, and added a test case which would have previously
triggered an assertion failure when processing (incorrect?) dwarf
expressions.
Reviewers: dsanders, arsenm, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: wdng, aprantl, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67154
llvm-svn: 372710
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the test is building a 64-bit executable, so the addresses should be
64-bit too. The test was still passing even with smaller address size,
but it was hitting the "unexpected end of data" error sooner than it
should.
llvm-svn: 370882
|
|
|
Summary:
While examining this class for possible use in lldb, I noticed two
things:
- it spits out parsing errors directly to stderr
- the loclists parser can incorrectly return valid location lists when
parsing malformed (truncated) data
I improve the stderr situation by making the parseOneLocationList
functions return Expected<T>s. The errors are still dumped to stderr by
their callers, so this is only a partial fix, but it is enough for my
use case, as I intend to parse the locations lists one by one.
I fix the behavior in the truncated scenario by using the newly
introduced DataExtractor Cursor API.
I also add tests for handling the error cases, as they currently have no
coverage.
Reviewers: dblaikie, JDevlieghere, probinson
Subscribers: lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63591
llvm-svn: 370363
|
