| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The new implementation works at least as well as the old implementation
did.
Also delete the associated preparation tests. They don't exercise
interesting corner cases of the new implementation. All the codegen
tests of the EH tables have already been ported.
llvm-svn: 249918
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Initially, these intrinsics seemed like part of a family of "frame"
related intrinsics, but now I think that's more confusing than helpful.
Initially, the LangRef specified that this would create a new kind of
allocation that would be allocated at a fixed offset from the frame
pointer (EBP/RBP). We ended up dropping that design, and leaving the
stack frame layout alone.
These intrinsics are really about sharing local stack allocations, not
frame pointers. I intend to go further and add an `llvm.localaddress()`
intrinsic that returns whatever register (EBP, ESI, ESP, RBX) is being
used to address locals, which should not be confused with the frame
pointer.
Naming suggestions at this point are welcome, I'm happy to re-run sed.
Reviewers: majnemer, nicholas
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11011
llvm-svn: 241633
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The personality routine currently lives in the LandingPadInst.
This isn't desirable because:
- All LandingPadInsts in the same function must have the same
personality routine. This means that each LandingPadInst beyond the
first has an operand which produces no additional information.
- There is ongoing work to introduce EH IR constructs other than
LandingPadInst. Moving the personality routine off of any one
particular Instruction and onto the parent function seems a lot better
than have N different places a personality function can sneak onto an
exceptional function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10429
llvm-svn: 239940
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
One code change and several test changes to match that
details in http://reviews.llvm.org/D9481
llvm-svn: 237150
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9684
llvm-svn: 237063
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This means we don't have to RAUW the landingpad instruction and
landingpad BB, which is a nice win.
llvm-svn: 235725
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the call instruction
See r230786 and r230794 for similar changes to gep and load
respectively.
Call is a bit different because it often doesn't have a single explicit
type - usually the type is deduced from the arguments, and just the
return type is explicit. In those cases there's no need to change the
IR.
When that's not the case, the IR usually contains the pointer type of
the first operand - but since typed pointers are going away, that
representation is insufficient so I'm just stripping the "pointerness"
of the explicit type away.
This does make the IR a bit weird - it /sort of/ reads like the type of
the first operand: "call void () %x(" but %x is actually of type "void
()*" and will eventually be just of type "ptr". But this seems not too
bad and I don't think it would benefit from repeating the type
("void (), void () * %x(" and then eventually "void (), ptr %x(") as has
been done with gep and load.
This also has a side benefit: since the explicit type is no longer a
pointer, there's no ambiguity between an explicit type and a function
that returns a function pointer. Previously this case needed an explicit
type (eg: a function returning a void() function was written as
"call void () () * @x(" rather than "call void () * @x(" because of the
ambiguity between a function returning a pointer to a void() function
and a function returning void).
No ambiguity means even function pointer return types can just be
written alone, without writing the whole function's type.
This leaves /only/ the varargs case where the explicit type is required.
Given the special type syntax in call instructions, the regex-fu used
for migration was a bit more involved in its own unique way (as every
one of these is) so here it is. Use it in conjunction with the apply.sh
script and associated find/xargs commands I've provided in rr230786 to
migrate your out of tree tests. Do let me know if any of this doesn't
cover your cases & we can iterate on a more general script/regexes to
help others with out of tree tests.
About 9 test cases couldn't be automatically migrated - half of those
were functions returning function pointers, where I just had to manually
delete the function argument types now that we didn't need an explicit
function type there. The other half were typedefs of function types used
in calls - just had to manually drop the * from those.
import fileinput
import sys
import re
pat = re.compile(r'((?:=|:|^|\s)call\s(?:[^@]*?))(\s*$|\s*(?:(?:\[\[[a-zA-Z0-9_]+\]\]|[@%](?:(")?[\\\?@a-zA-Z0-9_.]*?(?(3)"|)|{{.*}}))(?:\(|$)|undef|inttoptr|bitcast|null|asm).*$)')
addrspace_end = re.compile(r"addrspace\(\d+\)\s*\*$")
func_end = re.compile("(?:void.*|\)\s*)\*$")
def conv(match, line):
if not match or re.search(addrspace_end, match.group(1)) or not re.search(func_end, match.group(1)):
return line
return line[:match.start()] + match.group(1)[:match.group(1).rfind('*')].rstrip() + match.group(2) + line[match.end():]
for line in sys.stdin:
sys.stdout.write(conv(re.search(pat, line), line))
llvm-svn: 235145
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We don't need to represent UnwindHelp in IR. Instead, we can use the
knowledge that we are emitting the parent function to decide if we
should create the UnwindHelp stack object.
llvm-svn: 234061
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8596
llvm-svn: 234041
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This makes it possible to use the same representation of llvm.eh.actions
in outlined handlers as we use in the parent function because i32's are
just constants that can be copied freely between functions.
I had to add a sentinel alloca to the list of child allocas so that we
don't try to sink the catch object into the handler. Normally, one would
use nullptr for this kind of thing, but TinyPtrVector doesn't support
null elements. More than that, it's elements have to have a suitable
alignment. Therefore, I settled on this for my sentinel:
AllocaInst *getCatchObjectSentinel() {
return static_cast<AllocaInst *>(nullptr) + 1;
}
llvm-svn: 233947
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This lets us catch exceptions in simple cases.
N.B. Things that do not work include (but are not limited to):
- Throwing from within a catch handler.
- Catching an object with a named catch parameter.
- 'CatchHigh' is fictitious, we aren't sure of its purpose.
- We aren't entirely efficient with regards to the number of EH states
that we generate.
- IP-to-State tables are sensitive to the order of emission.
llvm-svn: 233767
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Generate tables in the .xdata section representing what actions to take
when an exception is thrown. This currently fills in state for
cleanups, catch handlers are still unfinished.
llvm-svn: 233636
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We don't have any logic to emit those tables yet, so the SDAG lowering
of this intrinsic is just a stub. We can see the intrinsic in the
prepared IR, though.
llvm-svn: 233354
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We don't have any logic to emit those tables yet, so the sdag lowering
of this intrinsic is just a stub. We can see the intrinsic in the
prepared IR, though.
llvm-svn: 233209
|
|
|
llvm-svn: 232851
|
