bcm5719-llvm - Project Ortega BCM5719 LLVM

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	[Codegen][X86][AArch64][ARM][PowerPC] Inc-of-add vs sub-of-not (PR42457)	Roman Lebedev	2019-07-03	1	-71/+46
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Summary: This is the backend part of [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42457 \| PR42457 ]]. In middle-end, we'd want to prefer the form with two adds - D63992, but as this diff shows, not every target will prefer that pattern. Out of 4 targets for which i added tests all seem to be ok with inc-of-add for scalars, but only X86 prefer that same pattern for vectors. Here i'm adding a new TLI hook, always defaulting to the inc-of-add, but adding AArch64,ARM,PowerPC overrides to prefer inc-of-add only for scalars. Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, efriedma, t.p.northover, hfinkel Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: nemanjai, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, kbarton, jsji, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64090 llvm-svn: 365010
*	[NFC][Codegen][X86][AArch64][ARM][PowerPC] Recommit: Add test coverage for ↵	Roman Lebedev	2019-07-02	1	-0/+569
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	"add-of-inc" vs "sub-of-not" I initially committed it with --check-prefix instead of --check-prefixes (again, shame on me, and utils/update_*.py not complaining!) and did not have a moment to understand the failure, so i reverted it initially in rL64939. llvm-svn: 364945
*	Revert "[NFC][Codegen][X86][AArch64][ARM][PowerPC] Add test coverage for ↵	Roman Lebedev	2019-07-02	1	-569/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	"add-of-inc" vs "sub-of-not"" Some test failures i don't have a moment to investigate. This reverts commit r364930. llvm-svn: 364939
*	[NFC][Codegen][X86][AArch64][ARM][PowerPC] Add test coverage for ↵	Roman Lebedev	2019-07-02	1	-0/+569
	"add-of-inc" vs "sub-of-not" As it is pointed out in https://reviews.llvm.org/D63992, before we get to pick canonical variant in middle-end we should ensure best codegen in backend. llvm-svn: 364930