| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
cost 0 anyway for free regs
The 2nd loop calculates spill costs but reports free registers as cost
0 anyway, so there is little benefit from having a separate early
loop.
Surprisingly this is not NFC, as many register are marked regDisabled
so the first loop often picks up later registers unnecessarily instead
of the first one available in the allocation order...
Patch by Matthias Braun
llvm-svn: 356499
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
LLVM normally prefers to minimize the number of bits set in an AND
immediate, but that doesn't always match the available ARM instructions.
In Thumb1 mode, prefer uxtb or uxth where possible; otherwise, prefer
a two-instruction sequence movs+ands or movs+bics.
Some potential improvements outlined in
ARMTargetLowering::targetShrinkDemandedConstant, but seems to work
pretty well already.
The ARMISelDAGToDAG fix ensures we don't generate an invalid UBFX
instruction due to a larger-than-expected mask. (It's orthogonal, in
some sense, but as far as I can tell it's either impossible or nearly
impossible to reproduce the bug without this change.)
According to my testing, this seems to consistently improve codesize by
a small amount by forming bic more often for ISD::AND with an immediate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50030
llvm-svn: 339472
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This matches what MSVC does for alloca() function calls on ARM.
Even if MSVC doesn't support VLAs at the language level, it does
support the alloca function.
On the clang level, both the _alloca() (when emulating MSVC, which is
what the alloca() function expands to) and __builtin_alloca() builtin
functions, and VLAs, map to the same LLVM IR "alloca" function - so
within LLVM they're not distinguishable from each other.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42292
llvm-svn: 323308
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
PR26485
llvm-svn: 261384
|
|
|
When performing a dynamic stack adjustment without optimisations, we would mark
SP as def and R4 as kill. This occurred as part of the expansion of a
WIN__CHKSTK SDNode which indicated the proper handling of SP and R4. The result
would be that we would double define SP as part of an operation, which is
obviously incorrect.
Furthermore, the VTList for the chain had an incorrect parameter type of i32
instead of Other.
Correct these to permit proper lowering of __builtin_alloca at -O0.
llvm-svn: 213442
|
