| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Convert ARMCodeGenPrepare into a generic type promotion pass by:
- Removing the insertion of arm specific intrinsics to handle narrow
types as we weren't using this.
- Removing ARMSubtarget references.
- Now query a generic TLI object to know which types should be
promoted and what they should be promoted to.
- Move all codegen tests into Transforms folder and testing using opt
and not llc, which is how they should have been written in the
first place...
The pass searches up from icmp operands in an attempt to safely
promote types so we can avoid generating unnecessary unsigned extends
during DAG ISel.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69556
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Apparently it got broken by r372009 while i thought it was r372012.
llvm-svn: 372019
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add an Argument that has the SExtAttr attached, as well as SIToFP
instructions, as values that generate sign bits. SIToFP doesn't
strictly do this and could be treated as a sink to be sign-extended.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61381
llvm-svn: 360331
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ConvertTruncs is used to replace a trunc for an AND mask, however
this function wasn't working as expected. By performing the change
later, we can create a wide type integer mask instead of a narrow -1
value, which could then be simply removed (incorrectly). Because we
now perform this action later, it's necessary to cache the trunc type
before we perform the promotion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57686
llvm-svn: 354108
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the last stage of type promotion, we replace any zext that uses a
new trunc with the operand of the trunc. This is okay when we only
allowed one type to be optimised, but now its the case that the trunc
maybe needed to produce a more narrow type than the one we were
optimising for. So we need to check this before doing the replacement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57041
llvm-svn: 351935
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 348489
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 348482
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This has two positive effects. First, using a custom node prevents
recombination leading to an infinite loop since the output DAG is notionally a
little more complex than the input one. Using a flag-setting instruction also
allows the subtraction to be folded with the related comparison more easily.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53190
llvm-svn: 348122
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 347238
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Truncs are treated as sources if their produce a value of the same
type as the one we currently trying to promote. Truncs used to be
considered as a sink if their operand was the same value type.
We now allow smaller types in the search, so we should search through
truncs that produce a smaller value. These truncs can then be
converted to an AND mask.
This leaves sinks as being:
- points where the value in the register is being observed, such as
an icmp, switch or store.
- points where value types have to match, such as calls and returns.
- zext are included to ease the transformation and are generally
removed later on.
During this change, it also became apart from truncating sinks was
broken: if a sink used a source, its type information had already
been lost by the time the truncation happens. So I've changed the
method of caching the type information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54515
llvm-svn: 347191
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that we have mixed type sizes, i1 values need to be explicitly
handled as we want to avoid promoting these values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54308
llvm-svn: 346499
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, during the search, all values had to have the same
'TypeSize', which is equal to number of bits of the integer type of
the icmp operand. All values in the tree had to match this size;
meaning that, if we searched from i16, we wouldn't accept i8s. A
change in type size requires zext and truncs to perform the casts so,
to allow mixed narrow types, the handling of these instructions is
now slightly different:
- we allow casts if their result or operand is <= TypeSize.
- zexts are sinks if their result > TypeSize.
- truncs are still sinks if their operand == TypeSize.
- truncs are still sources if their result == TypeSize.
The transformation bails on finding an icmp that operates on data
smaller than the current TypeSize.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54108
llvm-svn: 346480
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
r345840 slightly changed the way promotion happens which could
result in zext and truncs having the same source and destination
types. This fixes that issue.
We can now also remove the zext and trunc in the following case:
(zext (trunc (promoted op)), i32)
This means that we can no longer treat a value, that is only used by
a sink, to be safe to promote.
I've also added in some extra asserts and replaced a cast for a
dyn_cast.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54032
llvm-svn: 346125
|
|
|
While mutating instructions, we sign extended negative constant
operands for binary operators that can safely overflow. This was to
allow instructions, such as add nuw i8 %a, -2, to still be able to
perform a subtraction. However, the code to handle constants doesn't
take into consideration that instructions, such as sub nuw i8 -2, %a,
require the i8 -2 to be converted into i32 254.
This is a relatively simple fix, but I've taken the time to
reorganise the code a bit - mainly that instructions that can be
promoted are cached and splitting up the Mutate function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53972
llvm-svn: 345840
|
