bcm5719-llvm - Project Ortega BCM5719 LLVM

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	AMDGPU: Use SGPR_128 instead of SReg_128 for vregs	Matt Arsenault	2019-10-10	1	-3/+3
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	SGPR_128 only includes the real allocatable SGPRs, and SReg_128 adds the additional non-allocatable TTMP registers. There's no point in allocating SReg_128 vregs. This shrinks the size of the classes regalloc needs to consider, which is usually good. llvm-svn: 374284
*	[AMDGPU] gfx1010 VMEM and SMEM implementation	Stanislav Mekhanoshin	2019-04-30	1	-3/+3
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61330 llvm-svn: 359621
*	[AMDGPU] Add support for immediate operand for S_ENDPGM	David Stuttard	2019-03-12	1	-2/+2
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Summary: Add support for immediate operand in S_ENDPGM Change-Id: I0c56a076a10980f719fb2a8f16407e9c301013f6 Reviewers: alexshap Subscribers: qcolombet, arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, tpr, t-tye, eraman, arphaman, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59213 llvm-svn: 355902
*	[RegisterCoalescer] Fix for assert in removePartialRedundancy	Tim Renouf	2018-08-23	1	-0/+199
	Summary: I got "Use not jointly dominated by defs" when removePartialRedundancy attempted to prune then re-extend a subrange whose only liveness was a dead def at the copy being removed. V2: Removed junk from test. Improved comment. V3: Addressed minor review comments. Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, nhaehnle, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50914 Change-Id: I6f894e9f517f71e921e0c6d81d28c5f344db8dad llvm-svn: 340549