| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
- `dead-mi-elimination` assumes MIR in the SSA form and cannot be
arranged after phi elimination or DeSSA. It's enhanced to handle the
dead register definition by skipping use check on it. Once a register
def is `dead`, all its uses, if any, should be `undef`.
- Re-arrange the DIE in RA phase for AMDGPU by placing it directly after
`detect-dead-lanes`.
- Many relevant tests are refined due to different register assignment.
Reviewers: rampitec, qcolombet, sunfish
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72709
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There were 2 problems here. First, these patterns were duplicated to
handle the inverted shift operands instead of using the commuted
PatFrags.
Second, the point of the zext folding patterns don't apply to the
non-0ing high subtargets. They should be skipped instead of inserting
the extension. The zeroing high code would be emitted when necessary
anyway. This was also emitting unnecessary zexts in cases where the
high bits were undefined.
llvm-svn: 374092
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
instead of just equal the limit.
If anything called the recursive isKnownNeverNaN/computeKnownBits/ComputeNumSignBits/SimplifyDemandedBits/SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits with an incorrect depth then we could continue to recurse if we'd already exceeded the depth limit.
This replaces the limit check (Depth == 6) with a (Depth >= 6) to make sure that we don't circumvent it.
This causes a couple of regressions as a mixture of calls (SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits + combineX86ShufflesRecursively) were calling with depths that were already over the limit. I've fixed SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits to not do this. combineX86ShufflesRecursively is trickier as we get a lot of regressions if we reduce its own limit from 8 to 6 (it also starts at Depth == 1 instead of Depth == 0 like the others....) - I'll see what I can do in future patches.
llvm-svn: 367171
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch introduces the DAG version of SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits, which attempts to peek through ops (mainly and/or/xor so far) that don't contribute to the demandedbits/elts of a node - which means we can do this even in cases where we have multiple uses of an op, which normally requires us to demanded all bits/elts. The intention is to remove a similar instruction - SelectionDAG::GetDemandedBits - once SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits has matured.
The InstCombine version of SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits can constant fold which I haven't added here yet, and so far I've only wired this up to some basic binops (and/or/xor/add/sub/mul) to demonstrate its use.
We do see a couple of regressions that need to be addressed:
AMDGPU unsigned dot product codegen retains an AND mask (for ZERO_EXTEND) that it previously removed (but otherwise the dotproduct codegen is a lot better).
X86/AVX2 has poor handling of vector ANY_EXTEND/ANY_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG - it prematurely gets converted to ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG.
The code owners have confirmed its ok for these cases to fixed up in future patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63281
llvm-svn: 366799
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 363946
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Nodes that have no uses are eventually pruned when they are selected
from the worklist. Record nodes newly added to the worklist or DAG and
perform pruning after every combine attempt.
Reviewers: efriedma, RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, jyknight
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: jdoerfert, jyknight, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, javed.absar, hiraditya, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58070
llvm-svn: 357283
|
|
|
llvm-svn: 353593
|
