| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is generally more readable due to the way the assembler aliases
work.
(This causes a lot of test changes, but it's not really as scary as it
looks at first glance; it's just mechanically changing a bunch of checks
for orr to check for mov instead.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59720
llvm-svn: 356954
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
AArch64 can fold some shift+extend operations on the RHS operand of
comparisons, so swap the operands if that makes sense.
This provides a fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38751
Reviewers: efriedma, t.p.northover, javed.absar
Subscribers: mcrosier, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53067
llvm-svn: 344439
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
A follow-up for D49266 / rL337166 + D49497 / rL338044.
This is still the same pattern to check for the [lack of]
signed truncation, but in this case the constants and the predicate
are negated.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/BDV
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/n7Z
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon, javed.absar, efriedma, dmgreen
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51532
llvm-svn: 341287
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
check pattern.[NFC][X86][AArch64] A few more patterns for [lack of] signed truncation check pattern.
llvm-svn: 341188
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
optimizeSetCCOfSignedTruncationCheck()
At least one of these cases is more canonical,
so we really do have to handle it.
https://godbolt.org/g/pkzP3X
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/pQyh
llvm-svn: 337400
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38149 | PR38149 ]]
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D49179#1158957 and later,
the IR for 'check for [no] signed truncation' pattern can be improved:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/gBf
^ that pattern will be produced by Implicit Integer Truncation sanitizer,
https://reviews.llvm.org/D48958 https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21530
in signed case, therefore it is probably a good idea to improve it.
But the IR-optimal patter does not lower efficiently, so we want to undo it..
This handles the simple pattern.
There is a second pattern with predicate and constants inverted.
NOTE: we do not check uses here. we always do the transform.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon, javed.absar
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49266
llvm-svn: 337166
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
pattern
See D49247, D49266
I'm only adding the sane negative tests, and not
adding the one-use tests yet. Also, not adding
negative tests for the second pattern with inverted operands yet,
since it's handling will be added in later differential.
llvm-svn: 337014
|
|
|
Summary:
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38149 | PR38149 ]]
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D49179#1158957 and later,
the IR can be improved:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/gBf
^ that pattern will be produced by Implicit Integer Truncation sanitizer,
https://reviews.llvm.org/D48958
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21530
in signed case, therefore it is probably a good idea to improve it.
But as it looks from these tests,
i think we want to revert at least some cases in DAGCombine.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon, javed.absar
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49247
llvm-svn: 336917
|
