| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the first checkin to support Marvell ThunderX3T110.
Initial definition of the micro-ops of the instructions in ThunderX3T110
is included.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78129
(cherry picked from commit 382d3a85e2a9269569e7fb8caa487d7ef57900c6)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The Arm Neoverse E1 and Cortex-A65 Software Optimization Guide [1][2],
Section "4.7 Branch instruction alignment" state:
"It is preferable for branch targets, including subroutine entry points,
to be placed on aligned 64-bit boundaries to maximize instruction fetch
efficiency."
This patch sets the preferred function alignment on Neoverse E1 and
Cortex-A65 to 2^3=8B. This was already the case in some Cortex-A CPUs
such as Cortex-A53.
[1] https://developer.arm.com/docs/swog466751/latest/arm-neoversetm-e1-core-software-optimization-guide
[2] https://developer.arm.com/docs/swog010045/latest/arm-cortex-a65-core-software-optimization-guide
Reviewers: dmgreen, fhahn, samparker
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65937
llvm-svn: 368431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The Arm Neoverse N1 Software Optimization Guide [1], Section "4.8 Branch
instruction alignment" states:
"Consider aligning subroutine entry points and branch targets to 32B
boundaries, within the bounds of the code-density requirements of the
program."
This patch sets the preferred function alignment on Neoverse N1 to 2^4=16B.
This was already the case in some of the latest Cortex-A CPUs. Benchmarking
in previous Cortex-A CPUs suggested that 16B alignment is already better
than the default. See commit d04ee305.
The reason we don't set it to 32B right now (as the optimisation guide
suggests) is that this will impact code size and perhaps the instruction
cache performance. Therefore we need benchmark numbers first.
I have also added testing for A75 and A76 that we were missing.
[1] https://developer.arm.com/docs/swog309707/latest
Reviewers: fhahn, greened, samparker, dmgreen
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: dmgreen, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65654
llvm-svn: 367894
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 359484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add the scheduling and cost model for Exynos M3.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42387
llvm-svn: 323773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This change gives a 0.25% speedup on execution time, a 0.82% improvement
in benchmark scores and a 0.20% increase in binary size on a Cortex-A53.
These numbers are the geomean results on a wide range of benchmarks from
the test-suite and a range of proprietary suites.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, aadg, silviu.baranga, mcrosier, rengolin
Reviewed By: rengolin
Subscribers: grimar, davide, aemerson, rengolin, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35568
llvm-svn: 309494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: dblaikie, t.p.northover, rengolin
Reviewed By: rengolin
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, javed.absar, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35620
llvm-svn: 308852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Using 16 byte alignment is beneficial on Cortex-A73, similar to
Cortex-A72 (added in D34961).
Reviewers: mcrosier, t.p.northover, aadg, silviu.baranga
Reviewed By: t.p.northover
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35493
llvm-svn: 308283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This change gives a 0.89% speed on execution time, a 0.94% improvement
in benchmark scores and a 0.62% increase in binary size on a Cortex-A57.
These numbers are the geomean results on a wide range of benchmarks from
the test-suite, SPEC2000, SPEC2006 and a range of proprietary suites.
The software optimization guide for the Cortex-A57 recommends 16 byte
branch alignment.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, mcrosier, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, sbaranga
Reviewed By: kristof.beyls
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34954
llvm-svn: 307389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This change gives a 0.34% speed on execution time, a 0.61% improvement
in benchmark scores and a 0.57% increase in binary size on a Cortex-A72.
These numbers are the geomean results on a wide range of benchmarks from
the test-suite, SPEC2000, SPEC2006 and a range of proprietary suites.
The software optimization guide for the Cortex-A72 recommends 16 byte
branch alignment.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, kristof.beyls, rengolin, sbaranga, mcrosier, javed.absar
Reviewed By: kristof.beyls
Subscribers: llvm-commits, aemerson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34961
llvm-svn: 307380
|
|
Reviewers: evandro, joelkevinjones, mcrosier
Reviewed By: joelkevinjones, mcrosier
Subscribers: mcrosier, aemerson, llvm-commits, rengolin, evandro, javed.absar, joelkevinjones, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34951
llvm-svn: 307369
|