| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Current tail duplication integrated in bb layout is designed to increase the fallthrough from a BB's predecessor to its successor, but we have observed cases that duplication doesn't increase fallthrough, or it brings too much size overhead.
To overcome these two issues in function canTailDuplicateUnplacedPreds I add two checks:
make sure there is at least one duplication in current work set.
the number of duplication should not exceed the number of successors.
The modification in hasBetterLayoutPredecessor fixes a bug that potential predecessor must be at the bottom of a chain.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64376
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The list of indirect labels should ALWAYS have their blockaddresses as
argument operands to the callbr (but not necessarily the other way
around). Add an invariant that checks this.
The verifier catches a bad test case that was added recently in r368478.
I think that was a simple mistake, and the test was made less strict in
regards to the precise addresses (as those weren't specifically the
point of the test).
This invariant will be used to find a reported bug.
Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg753473.html
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/649
Reviewers: craig.topper, void, chandlerc
Reviewed By: void
Subscribers: ychen, lebedev.ri, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67196
llvm-svn: 372923
|
|
|
Summary:
A block address may be used in inline assembly. In which case it
requires a name so that the asm parser has something to parse. Creating
a name for every block address is a large hammer, but is necessary
because at the point when a temp symbol is created we don't necessarily
know if it's used in inline asm. This ensures that it exists regardless.
Reviewers: nickdesaulniers, craig.topper
Subscribers: nathanchance, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65352
llvm-svn: 368478
|
