| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
callee-save area.
Changes:
There was a condition for `!NeedsFrameRecord` missing in the assert. The
assert in question has changed to:
+ assert((!RPI.isPaired() || !NeedsFrameRecord || RPI.Reg2 != AArch64::FP ||
+ RPI.Reg1 == AArch64::LR) &&
+ "FrameRecord must be allocated together with LR");
This addresses PR43016.
llvm-svn: 369122
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 369080
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch changes the location of the frame-record (FP, LR) to the
bottom of the callee-saved area. According to the AAPCS the location of
the frame-record within the stackframe is unspecified (section 5.2.3 The
Frame Pointer), so the compiler should be free to choose a different
location.
The reason for changing the location of the frame-record is to prepare
the frame for allocating an SVE area below the callee-saves. This way the
compiler can use the VL-scaled addressing modes to directly access SVE
objects from the frame-pointer.
: :
| stack | | stack |
| args | | args |
+-------+ +-------+
| x30 | | x19 |
| x29 | | x20 |
FP -> |- - - -| | x21 |
| x19 | ==> | x22 |
| x20 | |- - - -|
| x21 | | x30 |
| x22 | | x29 |
+-------+ +-------+ <- FP
|///////| |///////| // realignment gap
|- - - -| |- - - -|
|spills/| |spills/|
| locals| | locals|
SP -> +-------+ +-------+ <- SP
Things to point out:
- The algorithm to find a paired register should be prevented from
accidentally pairing some callee-saved register with LR that is not
FP, since they should always be paired together when the frame
has a frame-record.
- For Darwin platforms the location of the frame-record is unchanged,
since the unwind encoding does not allow for encoding this position
dynamically and other tools currently depend on the former layout.
Reviewers: efriedma, rovka, rengolin, thegameg, greened, t.p.northover
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65653
llvm-svn: 368987
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Part of the effort to refactoring frame pointer code generation. We used
to use two function attributes "no-frame-pointer-elim" and
"no-frame-pointer-elim-non-leaf" to represent three kinds of frame
pointer usage: (all) frames use frame pointer, (non-leaf) frames use
frame pointer, (none) frame use frame pointer. This CL makes the idea
explicit by using only one enum function attribute "frame-pointer"
Option "-frame-pointer=" replaces "-disable-fp-elim" for tools such as
llc.
"no-frame-pointer-elim" and "no-frame-pointer-elim-non-leaf" are still
supported for easy migration to "frame-pointer".
tests are mostly updated with
// replace command line args ‘-disable-fp-elim=false’ with ‘-frame-pointer=none’
grep -iIrnl '\-disable-fp-elim=false' * | xargs sed -i '' -e "s/-disable-fp-elim=false/-frame-pointer=none/g"
// replace command line args ‘-disable-fp-elim’ with ‘-frame-pointer=all’
grep -iIrnl '\-disable-fp-elim' * | xargs sed -i '' -e "s/-disable-fp-elim/-frame-pointer=all/g"
Patch by Yuanfang Chen (tabloid.adroit)!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56351
llvm-svn: 351049
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
If the target requests it, use emptry spaces in the fixed and
callee-save stack area to allocate local stack objects.
AArch64: Change last callee-save reg stack object alignment instead of
size to leave a gap to take advantage of above change.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, qcolombet, MatzeB
Subscribers: rengolin, mcrosier, llvm-commits, aemerson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20220
llvm-svn: 271527
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
If a function needs to allocate both callee-save stack memory and local
stack memory, we currently decrement/increment the SP in two steps:
first for the callee-save area, and then for the local stack area. This
changes the code to allocate them both at once at the very beginning/end
of the function. This has two benefits:
1) there is one fewer sub/add micro-op in the prologue/epilogue
2) the stack adjustment instructions act as a scheduling barrier, so
moving them to the very beginning/end of the function increases post-RA
scheduler's ability to move instructions (that only depend on argument
registers) before any of the callee-save stores
This change can cause an increase in instructions if the original local
stack SP decrement could be folded into the first store to the stack.
This occurs when the first local stack store is to stack offset 0. In
this case we are trading off one more sub instruction for one fewer sub
micro-op (along with benefits (2) and (3) above).
Reviewers: t.p.northover
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18619
llvm-svn: 268746
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This change enables frame pointer elimination in non-leaf functions.
The -fomit-frame-pointer option still needs to be used when compiling
via clang (or an equivalent method of not setting the
'no-frame-pointer-elim*' function attributes if generating llvm IR via
some other method) to take advantage of this optimization.
This change should be NFC when compiling via clang without
-fomit-frame-pointer.
Reviewers: t.p.northover
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, tberghammer, qcolombet, llvm-commits, danalbert, mcrosier, srhines
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17730
llvm-svn: 262495
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Before this change, callee-save registers would be rounded up to even
pairs of GPRs and FPRs. This change eliminates these extra padding
load/stores, though it does keep the stack allocation the same size
unless both the GPR and FPR sets have an odd size, in which case one
full pair stack slot (16 bytes) is saved.
This optimization cannot currently be done for MachO targets since they
rely on a fast-path .debug_frame equivalent that can only encode
callee-save registers as pairs.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, rengolin, mcrosier, jmolloy
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17000
llvm-svn: 260689
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Disable post-ra scheduler for perturbed tests to appease the bots and to
preserve the history of the tests.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15652
llvm-svn: 256158
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14360
rdar://problem/20820748
llvm-svn: 253520
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's potentially more efficient on Cyclone, and from the optimization guides &
schedulers looks like it has no effect on Cortex-A53 or A57. In general you'd
expect a MOV to be about the most efficient instruction with its semantics,
even though the official "UXTW" alias is really a UBFX.
llvm-svn: 243576
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes PR23804: assertion failure in emitPrologue in the case of a
function with an empty frame and a dynamic alloca that needs stack
realignment. This is a typical case for AddressSanitizer.
llvm-svn: 241943
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If our two inputs have known top-zero bit counts M and N, we trivially
know that the output cannot have any bits set in the top (min(M, N)-1)
bits, since nothing could carry past that point.
llvm-svn: 241927
|
|
|
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8876
llvm-svn: 234471
|
