| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
As a follow-up to r236120, rename testcases to match the new names.
llvm-svn: 238853
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Finish off PR23080 by renaming the debug info IR constructs from `MD*`
to `DI*`. The last of the `DIDescriptor` classes were deleted in
r235356, and the last of the related typedefs removed in r235413, so
this has all baked for about a week.
Note: If you have out-of-tree code (like a frontend), I recommend that
you get everything compiling and tests passing with the *previous*
commit before updating to this one. It'll be easier to keep track of
what code is using the `DIDescriptor` hierarchy and what you've already
updated, and I think you're extremely unlikely to insert bugs. YMMV of
course.
Back to *this* commit: I did this using the rename-md-di-nodes.sh
upgrade script I've attached to PR23080 (both code and testcases) and
filtered through clang-format-diff.py. I edited the tests for
test/Assembler/invalid-generic-debug-node-*.ll by hand since the columns
were off-by-three. It should work on your out-of-tree testcases (and
code, if you've followed the advice in the previous paragraph).
Some of the tests are in badly named files now (e.g.,
test/Assembler/invalid-mdcompositetype-missing-tag.ll should be
'dicompositetype'); I'll come back and move the files in a follow-up
commit.
llvm-svn: 236120
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix testcases that don't pass the verifier after a WIP patch to check
`MDSubprogram` operands more effectively. I found the following issues:
- When `isDefinition: false`, the `variables:` field might point at
`!{i32 786468}`, or at a tuple that pointed at an empty tuple with
the comment "previously: invalid DW_TAG_base_type" (I vaguely recall
adding those comments during an upgrade script). In these cases, I
just dropped the array.
- The `variables:` field might point at something like `!{!{!8}}`,
where `!8` was an `MDLocation`. I removed the extra layer of
indirection.
- Invalid `type:` (not an `MDSubroutineType`).
llvm-svn: 233466
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
r230877 optimized which fields are written out for `CHECK`-ability, but
apparently missed changing some of them to optional in `LLParser`.
Fixes PR22921.
llvm-svn: 232400
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While gaining practical experience hand-updating CHECK lines (for moving
the new debug info hierarchy into place), I learnt a few things about
CHECK-ability of the specialized node assembly output.
- The first part of a `CHECK:` is to identify the "right" node (this
is especially true if you intend to use the new `CHECK-SAME`
feature, since the first CHECK needs to identify the node correctly
before you can split the line).
- If there's a `tag:`, it should go first.
- If there's a `name:`, it should go next (followed by the
`linkageName:`, if any).
- If there's a `scope:`, it should follow after that.
- When a node type supports multiple DW_TAGs, but one is implied by
its name and is overwhelmingly more common, the `tag:` field is
terribly uninteresting unless it's different.
- `MDBasicType` is almost always `DW_TAG_base_type`.
- `MDTemplateValueParameter` is almost always
`DW_TAG_template_value_parameter`.
- Printing `name: ""` doesn't improve CHECK-ability, and there are far
more nodes than I realized that are commonly nameless.
- There are a few other fields that similarly aren't very interesting
when they're empty.
This commit updates the `AsmWriter` as suggested above (and makes
necessary changes in `LLParser` for round-tripping).
llvm-svn: 230877
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Parse (and write) symbolic constants in debug info `flags:` fields.
This prevents a readability (and CHECK-ability) regression with the new
debug info hierarchy.
Old (well, current) assembly, with pretty-printing:
!{!"...\\0016387", ...} ; ... [public] [rvalue reference]
Flags field without this change:
!MDDerivedType(flags: 16387, ...)
Flags field with this change:
!MDDerivedType(flags: DIFlagPublic | DIFlagRValueReference, ...)
As discussed in the review thread, this isn't a final state. Most of
these flags correspond to `DW_AT_` symbolic constants, and we might
eventually want to support arbitrary attributes in some form. However,
as it stands now, some of the flags correspond to other concepts (like
`FlagStaticMember`); until things are refactored this is the simplest
way to move forward without regressing assembly.
llvm-svn: 230111
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the old (well, current) schema, there are two types of file
references: untagged and tagged (the latter references the former).
!0 = !{!"filename", !"/directory"}
!1 = !{!"0x29", !1} ; DW_TAG_file_type [filename] [/directory]
The interface to `DIBuilder` universally takes the tagged version,
described by `DIFile`. However, most `file:` references actually use
the untagged version directly.
In the new hierarchy, I'm merging this into a single node: `MDFile`.
Originally I'd planned to keep the old schema unchanged until after I
moved the new hierarchy into place.
However, it turns out to be trivial to make `MDFile` match both nodes at
the same time.
- Anyone referencing !1 does so through `DIFile`, whose implementation
I need to gut anyway (as I do the rest of the `DIDescriptor`s).
- Anyone referencing !0 just references an `MDNode`, and expects a
node with two `MDString` operands.
This commit achieves that, and updates all the testcases for the parts
of the new hierarchy that used the two-node schema (I've replaced the
untagged nodes with `distinct !{}` to make the diff clear (otherwise the
metadata all gets renumbered); it might be worthwhile to come back and
delete those nodes and renumber the world, not sure).
llvm-svn: 230057
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 229015
|
|
|
llvm-svn: 229014
|
