bcm5719-llvm - Project Ortega BCM5719 LLVM

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	Parse and print DIExpressions inline to ease IR and MIR testing	Reid Kleckner	2017-08-23	1	-3/+2
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Summary: Most DIExpressions are empty or very simple. When they are complex, they tend to be unique, so checking them inline is reasonable. This also avoids the need for CodeGen passes to append to the llvm.dbg.mir named md node. See also PR22780, for making DIExpression not be an MDNode. Reviewers: aprantl, dexonsmith, dblaikie Subscribers: qcolombet, javed.absar, eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37075 llvm-svn: 311594
*	[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.	Adrian Prantl	2016-12-20	1	-0/+23
	This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and DIExpression. Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the best way to model this: (1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable, not how to get to its location. (2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable. (3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons. This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades and a change to the Bitcode record for DIGlobalVariable, that makes upgrading the old format unambiguous also for variables without DIExpressions. <rdar://problem/29250149> https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769 llvm-svn: 290153