| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DemandedBits and BDCE currently only support scalar integers. This
patch extends them to also handle vector integer operations. In this
case bits are not tracked for individual vector elements, instead a
bit is demanded if it is demanded for any of the elements. This matches
the behavior of computeKnownBits in ValueTracking and
SimplifyDemandedBits in InstCombine.
Unlike the previous iteration of this patch, getDemandedBits() can now
again be called on arbirary (sized) instructions, even if they don't
have integer or vector of integer type. (For vector types the size of the
returned mask will now be the scalar size in bits though.)
The added LoopVectorize test case shows a case which triggered an
assertion failure with the previous attempt, because getDemandedBits()
was called on a pointer-typed instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55297
llvm-svn: 348602
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r348549. Causing assertion failures during
clang build.
llvm-svn: 348558
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DemandedBits and BDCE currently only support scalar integers. This
patch extends them to also handle vector integer operations. In this
case bits are not tracked for individual vector elements, instead a
bit is demanded if it is demanded for any of the elements. This matches
the behavior of computeKnownBits in ValueTracking and
SimplifyDemandedBits in InstCombine.
The getDemandedBits() method can now only be called on instructions that
have integer or vector of integer type. Previously it could be called on
any sized instruction (even if it was not particularly useful). The size
of the return value is now always the scalar size in bits (while
previously it was the type size in bits).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55297
llvm-svn: 348549
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add support for funnel shifts to the DemandedBits analysis. The
demanded bits of the first two operands can be determined if the
shift amount is constant. The demanded bits of the third operand
(shift amount) can be determined if the bitwidth is a power of two.
This is basically the same functionality as implemented in D54869
and D54478, but for DemandedBits rather than InstCombine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54876
llvm-svn: 347561
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 321527
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
* Add a bitreverse case in the demanded bits analysis pass.
* Add tests for the bitreverse (and bswap) intrinsic in the
demanded bits pass.
* Add a test case to the BDCE tests: that manipulations to
high-order bits are eliminated once the bits are reversed
and then right-shifted.
Reviewers: mkuper, jmolloy, hfinkel, trentxintong
Reviewed By: jmolloy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31857
llvm-svn: 300215
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18679
llvm-svn: 266699
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This regresses a test in LoopVectorize, so I'll need to go away and think about how to solve this in a way that isn't broken.
From the writeup in PR26071:
What's happening is that ComputeKnownZeroes is telling us that all bits except the LSB are zero. We're then deciding that only the LSB needs to be demanded from the icmp's inputs.
This is where we're wrong - we're assuming that after simplification the bits that were known zero will continue to be known zero. But they're not - during trivialization the upper bits get changed (because an XOR isn't shrunk), so the icmp fails.
The fault is in demandedbits - its contract does clearly state that a non-demanded bit may either be zero or one.
llvm-svn: 259649
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The computation of ICmp demanded bits is independent of the individual operand being evaluated. We simply return a mask consisting of the minimum leading zeroes of both operands.
We were incorrectly passing "I" to ComputeKnownBits - this should be "UserI->getOperand(0)". In cases where we were evaluating the 1th operand, we were taking the minimum leading zeroes of it and itself.
This should fix PR26266.
llvm-svn: 258690
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of bailing out when we see an icmp, we can instead at least
say that if the upper bits of both operands are known zero, they are
not demanded. This doesn't help with signed comparisons, but it's at
least better than bailing out.
llvm-svn: 249687
|
|
|
Like adds and subtracts, muls ripple only to the left so we can use
the same logic.
While we're here, add a print method to DemandedBits so it can be used
with -analyze, which we'll use in the testcase.
llvm-svn: 249686
|
