| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | [CostModel] Model all `extractvalue`s as free. | Roman Lebedev | 2019-08-29 | 1 | -24/+24 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: As disscussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D65148#1606412, `extractvalue` don't actually generate any code, so we should treat them as free. Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, jnspaulsson, greened, asb, t.p.northover, jmolloy, dmgreen Reviewed By: jmolloy Subscribers: javed.absar, hiraditya, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66098 llvm-svn: 370339 | ||||
| * | [CostModel][X86][AArch64] Check all 3 cost kinds in aggregates.ll | Roman Lebedev | 2019-08-12 | 1 | -25/+91 |
| | | | | | llvm-svn: 368595 | ||||
| * | [CostModel][X86][AArch64] Add some tests for extractvalue | Roman Lebedev | 2019-08-12 | 1 | -0/+76 |
| In https://reviews.llvm.org/D65148 it is suggested that it should have zero cost, always. llvm-svn: 368548 | |||||
 |
index : bcm5719-llvm | |
| Project Ortega BCM5719 LLVM | Raptor Computing Systems |
| summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats |
|