| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | Add files I seem to have dropped in my revert (r290086). | Daniel Jasper | 2016-12-19 | 1 | -0/+22 |
| | | | | | | | Sorry! llvm-svn: 290087 | ||||
| * | Remove the AssumptionCache | Hal Finkel | 2016-12-15 | 1 | -22/+0 |
| | | | | | | | | | | After r289755, the AssumptionCache is no longer needed. Variables affected by assumptions are now found by using the new operand-bundle-based scheme. This new scheme is more computationally efficient, and also we need much less code... llvm-svn: 289756 | ||||
| * | [PM] Actually add the new pass manager support for the assumption cache. | Chandler Carruth | 2015-01-22 | 1 | -0/+22 |
| I had already factored this analysis specifically to enable doing this, but hadn't actually committed the necessary wiring to get at this from the new pass manager. This also nicely shows how the separate cache object can be directly managed by the new pass manager. This analysis didn't have any direct tests and so I've added a printer pass and a boring test case. I chose to print the i1 value which is being assumed rather than the call to llvm.assume as that seems much more useful for testing... but suggestions on an even better printing strategy welcome. My main goal was to make sure things actually work. =] llvm-svn: 226868 | |||||
 |
index : bcm5719-llvm | |
| Project Ortega BCM5719 LLVM | Raptor Computing Systems |
| summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats |
|