| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We were correctly skipping dbginfo intrinsics and terminators, but the initial bailout wasn't, causing it to bail out on almost any block.
llvm-svn: 252152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
VPBROADCASTMW2D and VPBROADCASTMB2Q
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14335
llvm-svn: 252151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adjust the casted type. By casting to the same size rather than just the
signed-ness, we were asserting tautological statements. NFC.
llvm-svn: 252150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
GetUnderlyingObjects() can return "null" among its list of objects,
we don't want to deduce that two pointers can point to the same
memory in this case, so filter it out.
Reviewers: anemet
Subscribers: dexonsmith, llvm-commits
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 252149
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This doesn't quite match how SC prints it, which doesn't put it in a
comment.
llvm-svn: 252144
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Remove the loop over the uses of the CallSite in ArgumentUsesTracker.
Since we have the `Use *` for actual argument operand, we can just use
pointer subtraction.
The time complexity remains the same though (except for a vararg
argument) -- `std::advance` is O(UseIndex) for the ArgumentList
iterator.
The real motivation is to make a later change adding support for operand
bundles simpler.
Reviewers: reames, chandlerc, nlewycky
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14363
llvm-svn: 252141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The operand layout is slightly different for the atomic
opcodes from the usual MUBUF loads and stores.
This should only fix it on SI/CI. VI is still broken
because it still emits the addr64 replacement.
llvm-svn: 252140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
vaddr comes before srsrc in every other MUBUF instruction,
and is the order it is printed.
llvm-svn: 252139
|
|
|
|
|
| |
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 252137
|
|
|
|
|
| |
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 252136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The CLR's personality routine passes the pointer to the establisher frame
in RCX, not RDX.
Reviewers: pgavlin, majnemer, rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14343
llvm-svn: 252135
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is similar to the bounds check added to paramHasAttr in r252073.
llvm-svn: 252130
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This brings back the behavior from before r252090 for out of range symbols.
Should bring some arm bots back.
llvm-svn: 252119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
llvm-symbolizer understands both PDBs and DWARF, so it is more likely to
succeed at symbolization. If llvm-symbolizer is unavailable, we will
fall back to dbghelp. This also makes our crash traces more similar
between Windows and Linux.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, zturner, chapuni
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12884
llvm-svn: 252118
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With this change, instrumentation code and reader/write
code related to profile data structs are kept strictly
in-sync. THis will be extended to cfe and compile-rt
references as well.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13843
llvm-svn: 252113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This Abbrev was not emitted and basically unused, just leacking there.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 252110
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is pretty simple now that the yak is shaved.
llvm-svn: 252105
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We now always create the fragment, which lets us handle things like .org after
a .align.
llvm-svn: 252101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is enabled only under -ffast-math.
So, instead of emitting:
4007b0: 50 push %rax
4007b1: e8 8a fd ff ff callq 400540 <atanf@plt>
4007b6: 58 pop %rax
4007b7: e9 94 fd ff ff jmpq 400550 <tanf@plt>
4007bc: 0f 1f 40 00 nopl 0x0(%rax)
for:
float mytan(float x) {
return tanf(atanf(x));
}
we emit a single retq.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14302
llvm-svn: 252098
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the most recent units (they are more likely to be interesting)
llvm-svn: 252097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Earlier CaptureTracking would assume all "interesting" operands to a
call or invoke were its arguments. With operand bundles this is no
longer true.
Note: an earlier change got `doesNotCapture` working correctly with
operand bundles.
This change uses DSE to test the changes to CaptureTracking. DSE is a
vehicle for testing only, and is not directly involved in this change.
Reviewers: reames, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14306
llvm-svn: 252095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The generic infrastructure already did a lot of work to decide if the
fixup value is know or not. It doesn't make sense to reimplement a very
basic case: same fragment.
llvm-svn: 252090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Win64 has some strict requirements for the epilogue. As a result, we disable
shrink-wrapping for Win64 unless the block that gets the epilogue is already an
exit block.
Fixes PR24193.
llvm-svn: 252088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixed warnings are: modernize-use-override, modernize-use-nullptr and modernize-redundant-void-arg.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14312
llvm-svn: 252087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Splits PrintLoopPass into a new-style pass and a PrintLoopPassWrapper,
much like we already do for PrintFunctionPass and PrintModulePass.
llvm-svn: 252085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
instead of weights. NFC.
This is part-1 of the patch that replaces all edge weights in MBB by
probabilities, which only adds new interfaces. No functional changes.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908
llvm-svn: 252083
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Data operands of a call or invoke consist of the call arguments, and
the bundle operands associated with the `call` (or `invoke`)
instruction. The motivation for this change is that we'd like to be
able to query "argument attributes" like `readonly` and `nocapture`
for bundle operands naturally.
This change also provides a conservative "implementation" for these
attributes for any bundle operand, and an extension point for future
work.
Reviewers: chandlerc, majnemer, reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14305
llvm-svn: 252077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch improves the memory folding of the inserted float element for the (V)INSERTPS instruction.
The existing implementation occurs in the DAGCombiner and relies on the narrowing of a whole vector load into a scalar load (and then converted into a vector) to (hopefully) allow folding to occur later on. Not only has this proven problematic for debug builds, it also prevents other memory folds (notably stack reloads) from happening.
This patch removes the old implementation and moves the folding code to the X86 foldMemoryOperand handler. A new private 'special case' function - foldMemoryOperandCustom - has been added to deal with memory folding of instructions that can't just use the lookup tables - (V)INSERTPS is the first of several that could be done.
It also tweaks the memory operand folding code with an additional pointer offset that allows existing memory addresses to be modified, in this case to convert the vector address to the explicit address of the scalar element that will be inserted.
Unlike the previous implementation we now set the insertion source index to zero, although this is ignored for the (V)INSERTPSrm version, anything that relied on shuffle decodes (such as unfolding of insertps loads) was incorrectly calculating the source address - I've added a test for this at insertps-unfold-load-bug.ll
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13988
llvm-svn: 252074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is intended to make a later change simpler.
Note: adding this bounds checking required fixing `X86FastISel`. As
far I can tell I've preserved original behavior but a careful review
will be appreciated.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14304
llvm-svn: 252073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
scalar FMA intrinsics.
Patch by Slava Klochkov
The key difference between FMA* and FMA*_Int opcodes is that FMA*_Int opcodes are handled more conservatively. It is illegal to commute the 1st operand of FMA*_Int instructions as the upper bits of scalar FMA intrinsic result must be taken from the 1st operand, but such commute transformation would change those upper bits and invalidate the intrinsic's result.
Reviewers: Quentin Colombet, Elena Demikhovsky
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13710
llvm-svn: 252060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If we have a CMOV, OR and AND combination such as:
if (x & CN)
y |= CM;
And:
* CN is a single bit;
* All bits covered by CM are known zero in y;
Then we can convert this to a sequence of BFI instructions. This will always be a win if CM is a single bit, will always be no worse than the TST & OR sequence if CM is two bits, and for thumb will be no worse if CM is three bits (due to the extra IT instruction).
llvm-svn: 252057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When converting an alias to a non-alias when the aliasee is not
imported, ensure that the linkage type is set to external so that it is
a valid linkage type. Added a test case that exposed this issue.
llvm-svn: 252054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We can often end up with conditional stores that cannot be speculated. They can come from fairly simple, idiomatic code:
if (c & flag1)
*a = x;
if (c & flag2)
*a = y;
...
There is no dominating or post-dominating store to a, so it is not legal to move the store unconditionally to the end of the sequence and cache the intermediate result in a register, as we would like to.
It is, however, legal to merge the stores together and do the store once:
tmp = undef;
if (c & flag1)
tmp = x;
if (c & flag2)
tmp = y;
if (c & flag1 || c & flag2)
*a = tmp;
The real power in this optimization is that it allows arbitrary length ladders such as these to be completely and trivially if-converted. The typical code I'd expect this to trigger on often uses binary-AND with constants as the condition (as in the above example), which means the ending condition can simply be truncated into a single binary-AND too: 'if (c & (flag1|flag2))'. As in the general case there are bitwise operators here, the ladder can often be optimized further too.
This optimization involves potentially increasing register pressure. Even in the simplest case, the lifetime of the first predicate is extended. This can be elided in some cases such as using binary-AND on constants, but not in the general case. Threading 'tmp' through all branches can also increase register pressure.
The optimization as in this patch is enabled by default but kept in a very conservative mode. It will only optimize if it thinks the resultant code should be if-convertable, and additionally if it can thread 'tmp' through at least one existing PHI, so it will only ever in the worst case create one more PHI and extend the lifetime of a predicate.
This doesn't trigger much in LNT, unfortunately, but it does trigger in a big way in a third party test suite.
llvm-svn: 252051
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug found with afl-fuzz.
llvm-svn: 252048
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14109
llvm-svn: 252043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The x86 "sitofp i64 to double" dag combine, in 32-bit mode, lowers sitofp
directly to X86ISD::FILD (or FILD_FLAG). This should not be done in soft-float mode.
llvm-svn: 252042
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In my previous change to CVP (251606), I made CVP much more aggressive about trying to constant fold comparisons. This patch is a reversal in direction. Rather than being agressive about every compare, we restore the non-block local restriction for most, and then try hard for compares feeding returns.
The motivation for this is two fold:
* The more I thought about it, the less comfortable I got with the possible compile time impact of the other approach. There have been no reported issues, but after talking to a couple of folks, I've come to the conclusion the time probably isn't justified.
* It turns out we need to know the context to leverage the full power of LVI. In particular, asking about something at the end of it's block (the use of a compare in a return) will frequently get more precise results than something in the middle of a block. This is an implementation detail, but it's also hard to get around since mid-block queries have to reason about possible throwing instructions and don't get to use most of LVI's block focused infrastructure. This will become particular important when combined with http://reviews.llvm.org/D14263.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14271
llvm-svn: 252032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There is no point in having invoke safepoints handled differently than the
call safepoints. All relevant decisions could be made by looking at whether
or not gc.result and gc.relocate lay in a same basic block. This change will
allow to lower call safepoints with relocates and results in a different
basic blocks. See test case for example.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14158
llvm-svn: 252028
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252022
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252021
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The goal of this pass is to perform store-to-load forwarding across the
backedge of a loop. E.g.:
for (i)
A[i + 1] = A[i] + B[i]
=>
T = A[0]
for (i)
T = T + B[i]
A[i + 1] = T
The pass relies on loop dependence analysis via LoopAccessAnalisys to
find opportunities of loop-carried dependences with a distance of one
between a store and a load. Since it's using LoopAccessAnalysis, it was
easy to also add support for versioning away may-aliasing intervening
stores that would otherwise prevent this transformation.
This optimization is also performed by Load-PRE in GVN without the
option of multi-versioning. As was discussed with Daniel Berlin in
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9548, this is inferior to a more loop-aware
solution applied here. Hopefully, we will be able to remove some
complexity from GVN/MemorySSA as a consequence.
In the long run, we may want to extend this pass (or create a new one if
there is little overlap) to also eliminate loop-indepedent redundant
loads and store that *require* versioning due to may-aliasing
intervening stores/loads. I have some motivating cases for store
elimination. My plan right now is to wait for MemorySSA to come online
first rather than using memdep for this.
The main motiviation for this pass is the 456.hmmer loop in SPECint2006
where after distributing the original loop and vectorizing the top part,
we are left with the critical path exposed in the bottom loop. Being
able to promote the memory dependence into a register depedence (even
though the HW does perform store-to-load fowarding as well) results in a
major gain (~20%). This gain also transfers over to x86: it's
around 8-10%.
Right now the pass is off by default and can be enabled
with -enable-loop-load-elim. On the LNT testsuite, there are two
performance changes (negative number -> improvement):
1. -28% in Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog: the length of the
critical paths is reduced
2. +2% in Polybench/stencils/adi: Unfortunately, I couldn't reproduce this
outside of LNT
The pass is scheduled after the loop vectorizer (which is after loop
distribution). The rational is to try to reuse LAA state, rather than
recomputing it. The order between LV and LLE is not critical because
normally LV does not touch scalar st->ld forwarding cases where
vectorizing would inhibit the CPU's st->ld forwarding to kick in.
LoopLoadElimination requires LAA to provide the full set of dependences
(including forward dependences). LAA is known to omit loop-independent
dependences in certain situations. The big comment before
removeDependencesFromMultipleStores explains why this should not occur
for the cases that we're interested in.
Reviewers: dberlin, hfinkel
Subscribers: junbuml, dberlin, mssimpso, rengolin, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13259
llvm-svn: 252017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Will be used by the LoopLoadElimination pass.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13258
llvm-svn: 252016
|